Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Quoting Tonytifao (Reply 3): Well, we got that stupid war going on now. If it wasn't for that, I believe they would have intl flights. |
Quoting EXAAUADL (Reply 6): Since 1991 there have been no international flights to Iraq...so your contention is wrong, unless the sanction were lifted. |
Quoting BuyantUkhaa (Reply 1): Quite a few Chinese and Indian cities with over 1 million inhabitants and no intl. service I think. |
Quoting Reality (Reply 13):
Which of these cities, if any, do not have int'l service? There are probably many cities in the world with populations of 1 million or more that have no international service. This list only goes down to 3 million. Wuhan-China 7.1 million Tianjin-China 7.0 million Chongging-China 6.4 million Hyderabad-India 6.1 million Shenyang-China 4.7 million Dongguan-China 4.3 million Bandung-Indonesia 4.1 million Haerbin-China 3.7 million Surat-India 3.6 million Busan-South Korea 3.6 million Recife-Brasil 3.5 million Guiyang-China 3.5 million Fortaleza-Brasil 3.2 million Dalian-China 3.0 million |
Quoting AlexPorter (Reply 12): I don't know about the world, but the largest metro area in the U.S. without intercontinental service is the Riverside/San Bernardino/Ontario, CA metro area (AKA the Inland Empire), as ONT's only international flights are to Mexico. Of course, intercontinental flights are available an hour or so (traffic makes it much worse of course) at LAX. It is the 13th-largest metro area in the U.S. with 3.3 million people. |
Quoting Reality (Reply 13): Fortaleza-Brasil 3.2 million |
Quoting Reality (Reply 13): Haerbin-China |
Quoting Reality (Reply 13): Wuhan-China 7.1 million Tianjin-China 7.0 million |
Quoting Reality (Reply 13): Shenyang |
Quoting Reality (Reply 13): Busan-South Korea |
Quoting Reality (Reply 13): Dalian-China |
Quoting MD90fan (Reply 16): Wrong again. |
Quoting MD90fan (Reply 16): Quoting Reality (Reply 13): Fortaleza-Brasil 3.2 million TACV flies there using 757s. |
Quoting Steeler83 (Reply 18): How about PIT, with over 2.4 million people and the 20th largest MSA in the USA. |
Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 19): AC PIT-YYZ, CO PIT-YUL and USA3000 PIT-Cancun. |
Quoting LipeGIG (Thread starter): Any other major city without such kind of service ? |
Quoting BuyantUkhaa (Reply 22): Valencia Maracaibo(?) |
Quoting BuyantUkhaa (Reply 22): Japan: Yokohama Kyoto Hiroshima Kobe Fukuoka |
Quoting BuyantUkhaa (Reply 22): Philippines: Quezon City |
Quoting Steeler83 (Reply 18): Of course it's the only big metro that is losing population |
Quoting ConcordeBoy (Reply 25): ...where on Earth do you get that from?? |
Quoting Reality (Reply 13): Tianjin-China 7.0 million Dongguan-China 4.3 million |
Quoting N1120A (Reply 15): It shouldn't really count as a metro area, as it is really an extension of the Los Angeles metro. |
Quoting Steeler83 (Reply 26): I was referring to the top 20 MSAs in the USA. According to many posts on here in the past that contained cited census information, PIT is the only MSA that lost population from 1990-2000. I hope this clears up the ambiguity. My apologies. |
Quoting BuyantUkhaa (Reply 22): Indonesia: Bandung Semarang Surabaya |
Quoting BuyantUkhaa (Reply 22): Alexandria? |
Quoting BuyantUkhaa (Reply 22): Ahmadabad |
Quoting BuyantUkhaa (Reply 22): Yokohama |
Quoting BuyantUkhaa (Reply 22): Kyoto |
Quoting LurveBus (Reply 24): Yokohama is part of the Tokyo Metropolitan area, so it's served by HND and NRT. Kyoto and Kobe are part of the Kansai area, and even though Kobe has its own airport, international services are done through KIX. Fukuoka is served by many international airlines, a few of which are CX, CI, and PR. |
Quoting Ktachiya (Reply 29): Hiroshima? Didn't SQ fly into Hiroshima at one time? What happened to that service? |