User avatar
Francoflier
Posts: 4869
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2001 12:27 pm

Re: Telescoping Control Columns

Tue Sep 03, 2019 8:38 am

TTailedTiger wrote:
Only 200 hours? Not in the US and Canada. We're not really cool with 200 hour pilots on a 737. A transport category aircraft is no place for on the job training. I want both pilots having a say in the operation of the aircraft and both should be capable of safely getting it on the ground should the other become incapacitated. A 200 hour FO is looked upon as subservient and that is not what you want. He/she needs to be assertive. It's disappointing that some modern and some not so modern countries turn a blind eye to CRM.


Much to the US' and Canada's credit...
I'm very much with you on this one and I wish it was the same around the World... Alas, Airlines hungry for rapid expansion and faced with a shortage of qualified pilots, helped by compliant regulators, have seen to it that experience levels in cockpits are far from what, in my personal opinion, they should be.
But that's another debate.
I'll do my own airline. With Blackjack. And hookers. In fact, forget the airline.
 
TSS
Posts: 3227
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 3:52 pm

Re: Telescoping Control Columns

Tue Sep 03, 2019 9:14 am

vikkyvik wrote:
GalaxyFlyer wrote:
5,000 F-16 say otherwise


I seem to recall reading that the F-16 stick was originally not even going to move. It would just sense the force that the pilot was putting on it.

Not sure if that's true or not.


Absolutely true. My cousin who flew them said in early versions the stick didn't move at all and test pilots hated it, complaining of hand and arm cramps after each flight. Once a little bit of "give" was added to the stick, the test pilots were fine with it.
Able to kill active threads stone dead with a single post!
 
WIederling
Posts: 8693
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2015 2:15 pm

Re: Telescoping Control Columns

Tue Sep 03, 2019 10:06 am

TSS wrote:
My cousin who flew them said in early versions the stick didn't move at all and test pilots hated it, complaining of hand and arm cramps after each flight. Once a little bit of "give" was added to the stick, the test pilots were fine with it.


the Citroen DS (1955) had fully hydraulic operated brakes ( being fed by the hydro part of the hydropneumatic suspension and its pump. Quite the intricate design.)
The brake "pedal" was a little nearly unmoving knob.
Took quite a bit to get used to.
Murphy is an optimist
 
Nicoeddf
Posts: 851
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 7:13 am

Re: Telescoping Control Columns

Thu Sep 05, 2019 8:43 pm

Francoflier wrote:
TTailedTiger wrote:
Only 200 hours? Not in the US and Canada. We're not really cool with 200 hour pilots on a 737. A transport category aircraft is no place for on the job training. I want both pilots having a say in the operation of the aircraft and both should be capable of safely getting it on the ground should the other become incapacitated. A 200 hour FO is looked upon as subservient and that is not what you want. He/she needs to be assertive. It's disappointing that some modern and some not so modern countries turn a blind eye to CRM.


Much to the US' and Canada's credit...
I'm very much with you on this one and I wish it was the same around the World... Alas, Airlines hungry for rapid expansion and faced with a shortage of qualified pilots, helped by compliant regulators, have seen to it that experience levels in cockpits are far from what, in my personal opinion, they should be.
But that's another debate.


Don't follow you guys here.

You neither learn flying an airliner in a C172 cockpit, nor do you get the skill of being an "assertive pilot" by towing banners for 1500hrs.

Delivering a competent, assertive, mature and generally qualified pilot is a matter of a competent assessment followed by a high quality training, both in flying and personal competence.
The 1500hrs rule in the US and Canada is not delivering any higher degree of safety compared with fully integrated training programs of European flying schools. Numbers don't lie,

1500hrs of banner towing is not delivering any skill a competent and well assessed pilot wouldn't have after 200hrs.
Enslave yourself to the divine disguised as salvation
that your bought with your sacrifice
Deception justified for your holy design
High on our platform spewing out your crimes
from the altar of god
 
User avatar
Starlionblue
Posts: 19343
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 9:54 pm

Re: Telescoping Control Columns

Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:22 am

vikkyvik wrote:
Starlionblue wrote:
In an Airbus, speed is compensated for by the FBW system. A given stick deflection in pitch a given load factor, regardless of speed. A given stick deflection in roll gives a given roll rate, regardless of speed. So force feeedback doesn't really tell you anything.


Is that the way it works in Alternate and Direct Law, as well?.


On the A330, Alternate Law 1 is the same regarding stick inputs. In Alternate Law 2 you go to direct law in roll, but pitch stays the same.

Direct Law is, heh, direct stick to surface relationship. But you'd know you are in direct law and adjust control inputs accordingly. The main difference I found when trying it in the sim is that you are constantly making small corrections like in a "conventional" aircraft, since the plane doesn't stay put where you pointed it like in normal law.
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots." - John Ringo
 
ferren
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2018 5:38 pm

Re: Telescoping Control Columns

Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:22 pm

force feedback is not a correct name. i think that the most people talking about the need of the feedback are really talking about movement feedback (feel the movement from the second pilot).
there is no need to feel the control force.
 
WIederling
Posts: 8693
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2015 2:15 pm

Re: Telescoping Control Columns

Fri Sep 06, 2019 4:05 pm

ferren wrote:
force feedback is not a correct name. i think that the most people talking about the need of the feedback are really talking about movement feedback (feel the movement from the second pilot).
there is no need to feel the control force.

read:
https://safetyfirst.airbus.com/app/them ... inputs.pdf

ESPECIALLY item 6 on page 5
Murphy is an optimist
 
User avatar
Starlionblue
Posts: 19343
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 9:54 pm

Re: Telescoping Control Columns

Fri Sep 06, 2019 11:47 pm

WIederling wrote:
ferren wrote:
force feedback is not a correct name. i think that the most people talking about the need of the feedback are really talking about movement feedback (feel the movement from the second pilot).
there is no need to feel the control force.

read:
https://safetyfirst.airbus.com/app/them ... inputs.pdf

ESPECIALLY item 6 on page 5


"Dual input" is indeed a rather assertive warning. And IMHO all that is needed. Proper handover of control is essential, of course.
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots." - John Ringo
 
ferren
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2018 5:38 pm

Re: Telescoping Control Columns

Mon Sep 09, 2019 3:20 pm

Starlionblue wrote:
WIederling wrote:
ferren wrote:
force feedback is not a correct name. i think that the most people talking about the need of the feedback are really talking about movement feedback (feel the movement from the second pilot).
there is no need to feel the control force.

read:
https://safetyfirst.airbus.com/app/them ... inputs.pdf

ESPECIALLY item 6 on page 5


"Dual input" is indeed a rather assertive warning. And IMHO all that is needed. Proper handover of control is essential, of course.


dual input is only a warning that crm failed, but i still think that to see and feel what exactly is the second pilot doing, by simply observing the movment of the stick or following it by touch can be useful. typically when dealing with control problems, bad weather etc.
 
WIederling
Posts: 8693
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2015 2:15 pm

Re: Telescoping Control Columns

Mon Sep 09, 2019 3:53 pm

ferren wrote:
.......... but i still think that to see and feel what exactly is the second pilot doing, by simply observing the movement of the stick or following it by touch can be useful. typically when dealing with control problems, bad weather etc.


isn't this ignoring the paradigm disparity of
flying the plane(by the seat of your pants) vs commanding the plane(+FBW)
?
Murphy is an optimist
 
ferren
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2018 5:38 pm

Re: Telescoping Control Columns

Mon Sep 09, 2019 4:03 pm

WIederling wrote:
ferren wrote:
.......... but i still think that to see and feel what exactly is the second pilot doing, by simply observing the movement of the stick or following it by touch can be useful. typically when dealing with control problems, bad weather etc.


isn't this ignoring the paradigm disparity of
flying the plane(by the seat of your pants) vs commanding the plane(+FBW)
?


not sure that i understand your question, but lets extend it, it would be also nice to see what an autopilot is doing in the same way.

for example, i have no problem to use car with "autopilot" feature in the near future, but i will never buy car that is designed in a way, that steering wheel is not moving when computer controls it. no way, bad design
 
WIederling
Posts: 8693
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2015 2:15 pm

Re: Telescoping Control Columns

Mon Sep 09, 2019 4:31 pm

ferren wrote:
for example, i have no problem to use car with "autopilot" feature in the near future, but i will never buy car that is designed in a way, that steering wheel is not moving when computer controls it. no way, bad design


bad design? no
Moving wheel is "A Stoker on a Diesel engine".

Very few autopilots on ships and about half on recreational boats have "visible" steering.
( i.e. those were the AP works on the mechanically linked steering. )
Last edited by WIederling on Mon Sep 09, 2019 4:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Murphy is an optimist
 
User avatar
Erebus
Posts: 1032
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2015 2:40 am

Re: Telescoping Control Columns

Mon Sep 09, 2019 4:31 pm

ferren wrote:
for example, i have no problem to use car with "autopilot" feature in the near future, but i will never buy car that is designed in a way, that steering wheel is not moving when computer controls it. no way, bad design


Autopilot computer also controls acceleration and braking. Would you take issue with non-moving pedals? Or would you rely on other instruments for those...
 
ferren
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2018 5:38 pm

Re: Telescoping Control Columns

Mon Sep 09, 2019 4:37 pm

Erebus wrote:
ferren wrote:
for example, i have no problem to use car with "autopilot" feature in the near future, but i will never buy car that is designed in a way, that steering wheel is not moving when computer controls it. no way, bad design


Autopilot computer also controls acceleration and braking. Would you take issue with non-moving pedals? Or would you rely on other instruments for those...


some actions cannot be directly mapped. maybe i extended it too far. but it is still valid for the PF monitoring.
but probably valid for some actions, that can me directly mapped from the flying computer to pilot controls (throttle levers movement etc)
 
ferren
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2018 5:38 pm

Re: Telescoping Control Columns

Mon Sep 09, 2019 4:44 pm

WIederling wrote:
ferren wrote:
for example, i have no problem to use car with "autopilot" feature in the near future, but i will never buy car that is designed in a way, that steering wheel is not moving when computer controls it. no way, bad design


bad design? no
Moving wheel is "A Stoker on a Diesel engine".

Very few autopilots on ships and about half on recreational boats have "visible" steering.
( i.e. those were the AP works on the mechanically linked steering. )



but these are very slow reacting machines without doubled controls (or tripled human/human/computer). anyway it was probably not the best example, but still valid for the second human monitoring :-)
 
WIederling
Posts: 8693
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2015 2:15 pm

Re: Telescoping Control Columns

Mon Sep 09, 2019 4:49 pm

ferren wrote:
Erebus wrote:
ferren wrote:
for example, i have no problem to use car with "autopilot" feature in the near future, but i will never buy car that is designed in a way, that steering wheel is not moving when computer controls it. no way, bad design


Autopilot computer also controls acceleration and braking. Would you take issue with non-moving pedals? Or would you rely on other instruments for those...


some actions cannot be directly mapped. maybe i extended it too far. but it is still valid for the PF monitoring.
but probably valid for some actions, that can me directly mapped from the flying computer to pilot controls (throttle levers movement etc)


You'd get it for cars ( at the moment ) for the same reason it made initial sense on airplanes.
mechanical linkage between control device ( wheel, stick, yoke, accellerator, ... ) and execution device ( axle, rudder, .. throttle valve.
Here in Germany beyond a certain speed capability mechanical linkage is still required for steering.
Murphy is an optimist
 
ferren
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2018 5:38 pm

Re: Telescoping Control Columns

Mon Sep 09, 2019 5:04 pm

WIederling wrote:
ferren wrote:
Erebus wrote:

Autopilot computer also controls acceleration and braking. Would you take issue with non-moving pedals? Or would you rely on other instruments for those...


some actions cannot be directly mapped. maybe i extended it too far. but it is still valid for the PF monitoring.
but probably valid for some actions, that can me directly mapped from the flying computer to pilot controls (throttle levers movement etc)


You'd get it for cars ( at the moment ) for the same reason it made initial sense on airplanes.
mechanical linkage between control device ( wheel, stick, yoke, accellerator, ... ) and execution device ( axle, rudder, .. throttle valve.
Here in Germany beyond a certain speed capability mechanical linkage is still required for steering.



i know that in some military planes flight computers may use any control surface for the commanded action, sometimes there are not classic control surfaces (x tail, canards etc). lets move back to the pf monitoring, because he can do exactly the same actions as you, and you can monitor him with the same controls as he is using.
i know that it currently works, i like Airbus controls, but i still think that the joystick implementation is based on the price/complexity and not that it is actually better that joystick with movement feedback
 
WIederling
Posts: 8693
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2015 2:15 pm

Re: Telescoping Control Columns

Mon Sep 09, 2019 5:31 pm

ferren wrote:
i know that in some military planes flight computers may use any control surface for the commanded action, sometimes there are not classic control surfaces (x tail, canards etc). lets move back to the pf monitoring, because he can do exactly the same actions as you, and you can monitor him with the same controls as he is using.
i know that it currently works, i like Airbus controls, but i still think that the joystick implementation is based on the price/complexity and not that it is actually better that joystick with movement feedback


do any of the mil fully FBW planes have linked sticks?

afaik you have "synergistic use of of control surfaces" on an Airbus for example for doing a coordinated turn.
Murphy is an optimist
 
User avatar
Starlionblue
Posts: 19343
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 9:54 pm

Re: Telescoping Control Columns

Mon Sep 09, 2019 11:28 pm

ferren wrote:
WIederling wrote:
ferren wrote:

some actions cannot be directly mapped. maybe i extended it too far. but it is still valid for the PF monitoring.
but probably valid for some actions, that can me directly mapped from the flying computer to pilot controls (throttle levers movement etc)


You'd get it for cars ( at the moment ) for the same reason it made initial sense on airplanes.
mechanical linkage between control device ( wheel, stick, yoke, accellerator, ... ) and execution device ( axle, rudder, .. throttle valve.
Here in Germany beyond a certain speed capability mechanical linkage is still required for steering.



i know that in some military planes flight computers may use any control surface for the commanded action, sometimes there are not classic control surfaces (x tail, canards etc). lets move back to the pf monitoring, because he can do exactly the same actions as you, and you can monitor him with the same controls as he is using.
i know that it currently works, i like Airbus controls, but i still think that the joystick implementation is based on the price/complexity and not that it is actually better that joystick with movement feedback


Same for Airbus. The control system uses surfaces as required, and not necessarily in proportion to stick/yoke movement.

In other words, any feedback through the sticks would be entirely artificial. In order to know what the aircraft is doing, the instruments should be used. If the PM wants to monitor the PF, he should monitor the the movement of the aircraft, not stick inputs.

A non-moving stick is certainly not a cost-saving measure. Those things are very costly either way. It has to do with the Airbus control philosophy.

BTW we also never touch the pedals except on the ground, on landing and during an engine out. The rudder moves automatically to coordinate turns, with no feedback to the pedals. And yet no one complains about lack of feedback.
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots." - John Ringo

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos