USAviator
Topic Author
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 1:13 am

L1011 Question About a Small Detail

Wed Nov 13, 2019 1:28 am

Hello everyone,

I have searched and searched but I can't seem to find an answer to this question....

Why do some L1011's have a different shape underneath the inlet of engine #2?

For example, some L1011's have a clean, straight cutaway from the fuselage to engine #2, yet, other L1011's seem to have the fuselage curve upwards and blend into inlet #2... I attached some photos with some different L1011's below.

I don't know if I explained this well enough, but hopefully after seeing the photos, you can kind of tell what I am trying to convey :D The first two pictures show the fuselage blending to the inlet #2 while the last three pictures show the "clean" cut from inlet #2.

Many thanks!

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
 
mga707
Posts: 221
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:52 am

Re: L1011 Question About a Small Detail

Wed Nov 13, 2019 1:35 am

Going from memory, not checking reference books, that streamlined fairing in front of the #2 engine was a design change on the L-1011-500 series for improved fuel economy. So all -500s have it. Lockheed then offered it as a retrofit for earlier models. Some airlines retrofitted their 'standard' L-1011s, most did not. The Delta photo is a -500, the TWA photo below it shows one of their earlier L10s (TWA had no -500s) with the modification.
 
USAviator
Topic Author
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 1:13 am

Re: L1011 Question About a Small Detail

Wed Nov 13, 2019 1:40 am

mga707 wrote:
Going from memory, not checking reference books, that streamlined fairing in front of the #2 engine was a design change on the L-1011-500 series for improved fuel economy. So all -500s have it. Lockheed then offered it as a retrofit for earlier models. Some airlines retrofitted their 'standard' L-1011s, most did not. The Delta photo is a -500, the TWA photo below it shows one of their earlier L10s (TWA had no -500s) with the modification.


Thank you so much! I knew someone on this website would know something about it... Just another thing I know now. Thanks!
 
B757Forever
Posts: 826
Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 3:23 am

Re: L1011 Question About a Small Detail

Wed Nov 13, 2019 1:41 am

Delta also did a "250" mod to some of their -100s which added this feature.
The Rolls Royce Dart. Noise = Shaft Horsepower.
 
325i
Posts: 118
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2017 2:01 am

Re: L1011 Question About a Small Detail

Wed Nov 13, 2019 2:51 am

Hi US Aviator,good questionQuoted from Airliner Tech (Volume 8 on the Tristar)
"a diverter fairing called the Frisbee fairing was made to the inlet duct for the number 2 engine.
A significant noise reduction in the aft cabin area was accomplished by changing the airflow.
This was offered as an option on all models of the L-1011.
Should you be ,as I am, a L-!011 fan I recommend you purchase this publication.
Printed in 2001.
Kind regards, 325i.
 
JettNC
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2018 9:20 pm

Re: L1011 Question About a Small Detail

Wed Nov 13, 2019 4:27 am

As a side note, The EAL Tristar photo of ship 310, shown in an earlier post was the L1011 that crashed into the Everglades on 12/29/1972 on a flight from JFK to MIA. It was the subject of books and two TV movies, The Ghost of Flight 401.
 
AWACSooner
Posts: 2487
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:35 am

Re: L1011 Question About a Small Detail

Wed Nov 13, 2019 4:52 am

There’s all the correct answers above...but then there’s the REAL answer below:
So Lockheed could claim the title of “sexiest airplane EVER designed.” ;)
 
User avatar
Moose135
Posts: 3074
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 11:27 pm

Re: L1011 Question About a Small Detail

Wed Nov 13, 2019 5:36 am

325i wrote:
a diverter fairing called the Frisbee fairing was made to the inlet duct for the number 2 engine.

And for the record, it was named for the engineer who developed it, not the flying disc toy.
KC-135 - Passing gas and taking names!
 
User avatar
Ty134A
Posts: 509
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 11:21 am

Re: L1011 Question About a Small Detail

Wed Nov 13, 2019 7:23 am

AWACSooner wrote:
There’s all the correct answers above...but then there’s the REAL answer below:
So Lockheed could claim the title of “sexiest airplane EVER designed.” ;)


Unfortunately Lockheed only takes third place in this ranking, with IL-86 and TU-134 ranking first.
flown on: TU3,TU5,T20,IL8,IL6,ILW,IL9,I14,YK4,YK2,AN2,AN4,A26,A28,A38,A40,A81,SU9,L4T,L11,D1C,M11,M80,M87,
AB4,AB6,318,313,342,343,345,346,712,703,722,732,735,741,742,743,74L,744,752,753,763,772,77W,J31,F50,F70,100,ATP,
142,143,AR8,AR1,SF3,S20,D38,MIH...
 
Max Q
Posts: 7857
Joined: Wed May 09, 2001 12:40 pm

Re: L1011 Question About a Small Detail

Wed Nov 13, 2019 10:37 am

AWACSooner wrote:
There’s all the correct answers above...but then there’s the REAL answer below:
So Lockheed could claim the title of “sexiest airplane EVER designed.” ;)



Correct in every respect !
The best contribution to safety is a competent Pilot.
 
User avatar
WesternDC6B
Posts: 409
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:05 pm

Re: L1011 Question About a Small Detail

Wed Nov 13, 2019 1:50 pm

I’d sure like to fly on one again. The aircraft itself was very impressive, and like virtually every other Lockheed airliner, radiated “classy!”. I also want to fly on one again because when they were in main line service, passengers were not yet cattle: you actually had a bit of legroom in coach.
Remember: Only one dwarf in seven is Happy.
 
kurtverbose
Posts: 559
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2014 9:33 pm

Re: L1011 Question About a Small Detail

Wed Nov 13, 2019 4:42 pm

WesternDC6B wrote:
I’d sure like to fly on one again.


I flew on one when I was a kid. Out of Kuwait. It had engine failure and diverted. Spent the night in an horrible hotel with awful food.

I still really like the plane though.
 
Tristarsteve
Posts: 3609
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 11:04 pm

Re: L1011 Question About a Small Detail

Wed Nov 13, 2019 7:52 pm

When I worked for Gulf Air in Bahrain, we received our first Tristar with a frisbee fairing. We managed to convince one of our engineers that it moved and had an actuator. He got out the manlift and climbed into the S duct to look for the access panel.

That picture of the BEA Tristar was taken at the Farnborough airshow in London. (1973?) Lockheed painted up an Eastern aircraft before delivery to show it off. When the Tristars were delivered, BEA had become British Airways, so those colours only lasted a week.
 
BravoOne
Posts: 3683
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2013 2:27 pm

Re: L1011 Question About a Small Detail

Wed Nov 13, 2019 8:58 pm

Flown that Delta -500 a few times. Sweet airplane for sure.
 
Max Q
Posts: 7857
Joined: Wed May 09, 2001 12:40 pm

Re: L1011 Question About a Small Detail

Thu Nov 14, 2019 4:13 am

That ‘frisbee’ fairing makes a great looking aircraft even more attractive,
the carefully sculpted smooth aerodynamic curves and the way it all blends together in the tail area is a work of art, the L1011 makes the DC10 look positively agricultural


Don’t understand why it’s called a ‘frisbee’ fairing though !
The best contribution to safety is a competent Pilot.
 
User avatar
WesternDC6B
Posts: 409
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:05 pm

Re: L1011 Question About a Small Detail

Thu Nov 14, 2019 4:43 am

Max Q wrote:
That ‘frisbee’ fairing makes a great looking aircraft even more attractive,
the carefully sculpted smooth aerodynamic curves and the way it all blends together in the tail area is a work of art, the L1011 makes the DC10 look positively agricultural


Don’t understand why it’s called a ‘frisbee’ fairing though !


Named after an engineer. See above.

As for the DC-10: I’ll get nailed for this, but, here goes: it looks cobbled up. “We can’t get it off the ground, glue on an extra engine, and try again.” It’s just not an attractive aircraft at all.
Remember: Only one dwarf in seven is Happy.
 
Max Q
Posts: 7857
Joined: Wed May 09, 2001 12:40 pm

Re: L1011 Question About a Small Detail

Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:53 am

WesternDC6B wrote:
Max Q wrote:
That ‘frisbee’ fairing makes a great looking aircraft even more attractive,
the carefully sculpted smooth aerodynamic curves and the way it all blends together in the tail area is a work of art, the L1011 makes the DC10 look positively agricultural


Don’t understand why it’s called a ‘frisbee’ fairing though !


Named after an engineer. See above.

As for the DC-10: I’ll get nailed for this, but, here goes: it looks cobbled up. “We can’t get it off the ground, glue on an extra engine, and try again.” It’s just not an attractive aircraft at all.


Agree,

The vertical tail and #2 engine installation looks all wrong and the rudder is too small


Indeed DC had to install the wing engines much closer to the fuselage than the L1011 and install a double hinged rudder to provide enough yaw authority in the engine out case
The best contribution to safety is a competent Pilot.
 
slcguy
Posts: 373
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 12:09 pm

Re: L1011 Question About a Small Detail

Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:28 am

Just a little clarification on which aircraft had the Frisbee fairing. As stated before it was introduced on the -500 in 1979. It became standard on all versions after that in the last few years of the production run.
An example is Delta, the final ten -1s starting with ship 730 delivered in 1980 had it. The last 6 of which were converted to -250s. It was also available to be retrofitted to older aircraft. Most airlines didn't modify their aircraft but a few did. TWA being a notable example, while a lot of their fleet was older and were not delivered with the fairing, they ended up retrofitting most if not all of their fleet by the late 1980s.
 
Leej
Posts: 372
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2001 10:39 pm

Re: L1011 Question About a Small Detail

Thu Nov 14, 2019 12:08 pm

About the size of the fairing - is it just a kind of cone beneath the inlet, or is it faired all the way back to the tail either side (and below) the intake? The picture of the TWA bird kind of shows it is quite sizeable.
 
Max Q
Posts: 7857
Joined: Wed May 09, 2001 12:40 pm

Re: L1011 Question About a Small Detail

Fri Nov 15, 2019 8:58 am

Leej wrote:
About the size of the fairing - is it just a kind of cone beneath the inlet, or is it faired all the way back to the tail either side (and below) the intake? The picture of the TWA bird kind of shows it is quite sizeable.



It’s just the vertical fairing that starts from the bottom of the #2 engine cowling angling forward and down until it intersects with the top of the fuselage
The best contribution to safety is a competent Pilot.
 
Kno
Posts: 381
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2016 10:08 pm

Re: L1011 Question About a Small Detail

Fri Nov 15, 2019 5:37 pm

WesternDC6B wrote:
Max Q wrote:
That ‘frisbee’ fairing makes a great looking aircraft even more attractive,
the carefully sculpted smooth aerodynamic curves and the way it all blends together in the tail area is a work of art, the L1011 makes the DC10 look positively agricultural


Don’t understand why it’s called a ‘frisbee’ fairing though !


Named after an engineer. See above.

As for the DC-10: I’ll get nailed for this, but, here goes: it looks cobbled up. “We can’t get it off the ground, glue on an extra engine, and try again.” It’s just not an attractive aircraft at all.


I might be in the minority but I actually think the DC10 is a far better looking plane than the l1011 - something about the shape of the L1011s nose looks awkward to me.
 
GalaxyFlyer
Posts: 4129
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2016 4:44 am

Re: L1011 Question About a Small Detail

Fri Nov 15, 2019 8:14 pm

Something about flat pane windows; cobbled up tail engine design and appalling accident history makes the DC-10 ugly to me.
 
ExpatVet
Posts: 118
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2018 4:35 am

Re: L1011 Question About a Small Detail

Fri Nov 15, 2019 8:17 pm

kurtverbose wrote:
WesternDC6B wrote:
I’d sure like to fly on one again.


I flew on one when I was a kid. Out of Kuwait. It had engine failure and diverted. Spent the night in an horrible hotel with awful food.

I still really like the plane though.


I remember walking out to the TriStars as a kid at the old Dhahran International airport. Good times!
L101, 733/4/5/8, 741/2/3 (never managed 744!), MD 80/2/3/8/90, MD11, DHC8/3/Q4, E170, E195, 757, 77W, 763/4, Travel Air 2000. A300/310, A319/320/321, A333, ATR-72, probably a few others I forget. Passenger, not pilot, alas! BUD based.
 
Max Q
Posts: 7857
Joined: Wed May 09, 2001 12:40 pm

Re: L1011 Question About a Small Detail

Sat Nov 16, 2019 5:10 am

GalaxyFlyer wrote:
Something about flat pane windows; cobbled up tail engine design and appalling accident history makes the DC-10 ugly to me.



People forget how unsafe the 10 was until they finally addressed its design shortcomings, the AA accident in Chicago is often blamed on poor maintenance procedures but thats only part of the story


DC never incorporated a lock out to prevent asymmetric slat retraction unlike the L1011 so after the engine departed the aircraft the left slat retracted instantly stalling that wing


But for that the aircraft would have been saved.
The best contribution to safety is a competent Pilot.
 
User avatar
DocLightning
Posts: 21606
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 8:51 am

Re: L1011 Question About a Small Detail

Sat Nov 16, 2019 9:01 pm

When you have a protrusion sticking straight up out of a surface over which air flows, an interference vortex called a "horseshoe vortex" will form around the base of that protrusion.

Image

The tailfin of the L-1011 had a really large protrusion due to the S duct that probably caused a huge horseshoe vortex. That fairing likely reduced the magnitude and violence of that vortex, reducing cabin noise and overall drag.
-Doc Lightning-

"The sky calls to us. If we do not destroy ourselves, we will one day venture to the stars."
-Carl Sagan
 
asr0dzjq
Posts: 90
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:36 am

Re: L1011 Question About a Small Detail

Sun Nov 17, 2019 5:35 pm

AWACSooner wrote:
So Lockheed could claim the title of “sexiest airplane EVER designed.” ;)

Laughs in 747
R.I.P.

Pan Am (B 19-10-1927, D 4-12-1991)
TWA (B 1-10-1930, D 1-12-2001)
Douglas (B 22-7-1921, D 23-5-2006)
 
Leej
Posts: 372
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2001 10:39 pm

Re: L1011 Question About a Small Detail

Tue Nov 19, 2019 2:01 pm

DocLightning wrote:
When you have a protrusion sticking straight up out of a surface over which air flows, an interference vortex called a "horseshoe vortex" will form around the base of that protrusion.

Image

The tailfin of the L-1011 had a really large protrusion due to the S duct that probably caused a huge horseshoe vortex. That fairing likely reduced the magnitude and violence of that vortex, reducing cabin noise and overall drag.


I wonder if Boeing ever tried something similar with the 727?
 
Max Q
Posts: 7857
Joined: Wed May 09, 2001 12:40 pm

Re: L1011 Question About a Small Detail

Wed Nov 20, 2019 7:58 am

Leej wrote:
DocLightning wrote:
When you have a protrusion sticking straight up out of a surface over which air flows, an interference vortex called a "horseshoe vortex" will form around the base of that protrusion.

Image

The tailfin of the L-1011 had a really large protrusion due to the S duct that probably caused a huge horseshoe vortex. That fairing likely reduced the magnitude and violence of that vortex, reducing cabin noise and overall drag.


I wonder if Boeing ever tried something similar with the 727?



No, slightly off topic though they did change the intake shape from oval to round on the #2 engine when they transitioned from the -100 to the -200 series


Supposed to provide better aerodynamics and airflow to that engine
The best contribution to safety is a competent Pilot.
 
User avatar
dlednicer
Editor
Posts: 542
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 9:35 am

Re: L1011 Question About a Small Detail

Thu Nov 21, 2019 1:37 am

Leej wrote:
DocLightning wrote:
When you have a protrusion sticking straight up out of a surface over which air flows, an interference vortex called a "horseshoe vortex" will form around the base of that protrusion.

Image

The tailfin of the L-1011 had a really large protrusion due to the S duct that probably caused a huge horseshoe vortex. That fairing likely reduced the magnitude and violence of that vortex, reducing cabin noise and overall drag.


I wonder if Boeing ever tried something similar with the 727?


I proposed it to Valsan for the 727RE, but was told that the cost/benefit ratio wasn't very good.

BTW, we often call this a "necklace vortex". Navier-Stokes CFD analyses have the ability to resolve them. I've seen them, one place or another, on almost every aircraft type I've run in CFD.
 
User avatar
DarkSnowyNight
Posts: 2381
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2012 7:59 pm

Re: L1011 Question About a Small Detail

Thu Nov 21, 2019 4:18 pm

Kno wrote:
WesternDC6B wrote:
Max Q wrote:
That ‘frisbee’ fairing makes a great looking aircraft even more attractive,
the carefully sculpted smooth aerodynamic curves and the way it all blends together in the tail area is a work of art, the L1011 makes the DC10 look positively agricultural


Don’t understand why it’s called a ‘frisbee’ fairing though !


Named after an engineer. See above.

As for the DC-10: I’ll get nailed for this, but, here goes: it looks cobbled up. “We can’t get it off the ground, glue on an extra engine, and try again.” It’s just not an attractive aircraft at all.


I might be in the minority but I actually think the DC10 is a far better looking plane than the l1011 - something about the shape of the L1011s nose looks awkward to me.



Objectively, the L1011 was superior in almost every way.

But I have to agree about the looks. I do not get where this 'Sexy' is meant to come from. I always think of a Sea Otter wearing a Top Hat when I see one. Not ugly, but not Sexy, neither.
"Ya Can't Win, Rocky! There's no Oxygen on Mars!"
"Yeah? That means there's no Oxygen for him Neither..."
 
Kno
Posts: 381
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2016 10:08 pm

Re: L1011 Question About a Small Detail

Thu Nov 21, 2019 5:42 pm

the looks of the l1011 always gave me a minivan vibe where as the dc10 gives me more of a ford bronco vibe.
 
Max Q
Posts: 7857
Joined: Wed May 09, 2001 12:40 pm

Re: L1011 Question About a Small Detail

Fri Nov 22, 2019 8:25 am

DarkSnowyNight wrote:
Kno wrote:
WesternDC6B wrote:

Named after an engineer. See above.

As for the DC-10: I’ll get nailed for this, but, here goes: it looks cobbled up. “We can’t get it off the ground, glue on an extra engine, and try again.” It’s just not an attractive aircraft at all.


I might be in the minority but I actually think the DC10 is a far better looking plane than the l1011 - something about the shape of the L1011s nose looks awkward to me.



Objectively, the L1011 was superior in almost every way.

But I have to agree about the looks. I do not get where this 'Sexy' is meant to come from. I always think of a Sea Otter wearing a Top Hat when I see one. Not ugly, but not Sexy, neither.



Agree,

What I see when I look at an L1011 is refined, beautifully crafted and advanced sophistication


The DC10, while not ugly looks agricultural and crude in comparison
The best contribution to safety is a competent Pilot.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: asr0dzjq, Georgetown, Web500sjc and 10 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos