Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR

 
WIederling
Posts: 10043
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2015 2:15 pm

Re: Why did Airbus switch to winglets so late in the A320

Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:31 am

GalaxyFlyer wrote:
Richard Whitcomb designed them and Learjet 28 “Longhorn” in 1977 was the first to fly. BAE was later

https://www.jstor.org/stable/44699039?seq=1


[email protected] seems to have "reinvented" quite a lot, right? :-)

von Hoerner, some others worked ahead of Whitcomb afaik.
( Theoretical understanding of area rule, remedial shock bodies started in WWII.)
Murphy is an optimist
 
User avatar
747classic
Posts: 3848
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 9:13 am

Re: Why did Airbus switch to winglets so late in the A320

Sun Feb 28, 2021 1:06 pm

WIederling wrote:
GalaxyFlyer wrote:
Richard Whitcomb designed them and Learjet 28 “Longhorn” in 1977 was the first to fly. BAE was later

https://www.jstor.org/stable/44699039?seq=1


[email protected] seems to have "reinvented" quite a lot, right? :-)

von Hoerner, some others worked ahead of Whitcomb afaik.
( Theoretical understanding of area rule, remedial shock bodies started in WWII.)


Correct :checkmark:

Wingtip devices are designed earlier (1941?) and are intended to improve the efficiency of fixed-wing aircraft by reducing drag. Although there are several types of wing tip devices which function in different manners, their intended effect is always to reduce an aircraft's drag by partial recovery of the tip vortex energy.

However in this thread we are discussing the "blended winglet" versus "sharklet" case.
Operating a twin over the ocean, you're always one engine failure from a total emergency.
 
GalaxyFlyer
Posts: 7821
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2016 4:44 am

Re: Why did Airbus switch to winglets so late in the A320

Sun Feb 28, 2021 1:18 pm

WIederling wrote:
GalaxyFlyer wrote:
Richard Whitcomb designed them and Learjet 28 “Longhorn” in 1977 was the first to fly. BAE was later

https://www.jstor.org/stable/44699039?seq=1


[email protected] seems to have "reinvented" quite a lot, right? :-)

von Hoerner, some others worked ahead of Whitcomb afaik.
( Theoretical understanding of area rule, remedial shock bodies started in WWII.)


True enough, but then why weren’t they used earlier than the Learjet application. We didn’t winglets on, say, the Trident or the 727, 737 until long after the WW II experiments. If there had been an application on a German or European jet airliner design, I haven’t seen it.
 
WIederling
Posts: 10043
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2015 2:15 pm

Re: Why did Airbus switch to winglets so late in the A320

Sun Feb 28, 2021 3:45 pm

GalaxyFlyer wrote:
WIederling wrote:
GalaxyFlyer wrote:
Richard Whitcomb designed them and Learjet 28 “Longhorn” in 1977 was the first to fly. BAE was later

https://www.jstor.org/stable/44699039?seq=1


[email protected] seems to have "reinvented" quite a lot, right? :-)

von Hoerner, some others worked ahead of Whitcomb afaik.
( Theoretical understanding of area rule, remedial shock bodies started in WWII.)


True enough, but then why weren’t they used earlier than the Learjet application. We didn’t winglets on, say, the Trident or the 727, 737 until long after the WW II experiments. If there had been an application on a German or European jet airliner design, I haven’t seen it.


basic idea was floated around/before WWI ?
Then
fuel was cheap ( we had box carriers with gas turbine propulsion (gen3) that cruised faster ( 27..30kn ) than most warships :-) .
more happened in the glider domain. academics and smallish commercial.

For gliders anything that reduces drag is welcome.

I'd like to see a comparison of the various types versus the window of usefulness.
Argument I seem to remember was that winglets, fences, endplates, ... each peak ( or have wider scope of usefulnes ) in different segments of flight regime.
Even between B winglets ( how brilliant to homestead a generic term ) and A sharklets seem to exist differences in profiling though the basic shape seems to be first blush similar.

Another interesting domain is belly fairings. ( historic evolution but also solutions like the recently available SHARP modification for better short field performance on A320. Look ma, no moving parts :-)
Murphy is an optimist

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: N1120A and 11 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos