Probably within manufacturing tolerances, but we’d never know it. We could load one side of a C-5 with 18 pallets of about 100.000#, leave the other side empty and notice it. Lots of weight, little arm

seat1a wrote:

Not sure how to phrase the question - but is a Boeing 787 or Airbus A321 without the airline customers configuration of seats, etc., perfectly balanced 50/50? If you were to draw a line down the middle of the plane, would both sides be equal in weight?

Whether an Aircraft is loaded or no it always has a desired CG range in which it has to be operated. An airliner also relies but not neccessarrily on systems such as Trimmable Horizontal stabilisers/trim tanks to assist in CG balancing.

The CG will vary upon a loading as will the center of pressure but there is range of motion that must be maintained for stability. For longitudinal static stability the CG should be forward of the center of Lift. That way, if there is a pitch disturbance upwards, the resulting change in AOA and increase in lift will produce a torque downwards back to trim. Conversely, if downward pitch is induced a reduction in lift will produce a restorative torque to trim. Once the, CG is aft of the center of pressure, the reverse happens and a positive disturbance in AOA will produce an even more positive destabilizing torque and a negative AOA will produce a further downwards pitching moment.

StereoTechque wrote:

seat1a wrote:

Not sure how to phrase the question - but is a Boeing 787 or Airbus A321 without the airline customers configuration of seats, etc., perfectly balanced 50/50? If you were to draw a line down the middle of the plane, would both sides be equal in weight?

Whether an Aircraft is loaded or no it always has a desired CG range in which it has to be operated. An airliner also relies but not neccessarrily on systems such as Trimmable Horizontal stabilisers/trim tanks to assist in CG balancing.

The aircraft has to stay in its limits of a fan diagram.

https://dcs.aero/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/diagram.png

For an aircraft athwartship CG is not as critical as it is for helicopters

We care where CG is longitudinally but don’t consider where it is left/right of the buttline.

Given latest discussion about manufacturing tolerance affecting empty weight, as well as design asymmetry - such as different doors for R1 and L1, I doubt there is a perfect symmetry.
Arm is small, as it was pointed out, so effect is limited

kalvado wrote:

Given latest discussion about manufacturing tolerance affecting empty weight, as well as design asymmetry - such as different doors for R1 and L1, I doubt there is a perfect symmetry.
Arm is small, as it was pointed out, so effect is limited

There are tolerances on the lateral roll/trim which are checked out during production flights.
But that's probably more to do with aerodynamic effects than weight.

Woodreau wrote:

For an aircraft athwartship CG is not as critical as it is for helicopters

We care where CG is longitudinally but don’t consider where it is left/right of the buttline.

You will get a fuel imbalance alert if your tank balance left/right exceeds a threshold.

ReverseFlow wrote:

Woodreau wrote:

For an aircraft athwartship CG is not as critical as it is for helicopters

We care where CG is longitudinally but don’t consider where it is left/right of the buttline.

You will get a fuel imbalance alert if your tank balance left/right exceeds a threshold.

Can you give an idea of what that threshold is? I suspect around 1% of max fuel or so?

kalvado wrote:

ReverseFlow wrote:

Woodreau wrote:

For an aircraft athwartship CG is not as critical as it is for helicopters

We care where CG is longitudinally but don’t consider where it is left/right of the buttline.

You will get a fuel imbalance alert if your tank balance left/right exceeds a threshold.

Can you give an idea of what that threshold is? I suspect around 1% of max fuel or so?

From here

https://www.boeing.com/commercial/aerom ... tonly.html

This table for example

https://www.boeing.com/commercial/aerom ... ble01.html

kalvado wrote:

ReverseFlow wrote:

Woodreau wrote:

For an aircraft athwartship CG is not as critical as it is for helicopters

We care where CG is longitudinally but don’t consider where it is left/right of the buttline.

You will get a fuel imbalance alert if your tank balance left/right exceeds a threshold.

Can you give an idea of what that threshold is? I suspect around 1% of max fuel or so?

Varies by design, how spread across the wings the fuel tanks.

seat1a wrote:

If you were to draw a line down the middle of the plane, would both sides be equal in weight?

Probably not, but it'd be close to within a very small percentage of the overall OEW.

As others have said, any lateral weight imbalance from airline specific cabin fitouts acts upon a very small moment arm relative to the wingspan, as such; lateral balance would be achievable with very small amounts of lateral trim.

Regards, JetMech

seat1a wrote:

Not sure how to phrase the question - but is a Boeing 787 or Airbus A321 without the airline customers configuration of seats, etc., perfectly balanced 50/50? If you were to draw a line down the middle of the plane, would both sides be equal in weight?

The airplane isn't symmetrical left/right, so no. The cargo doors add weight to the right side, the hydraulics and pneumatics bowels are not perfectly symmetrical, there probably isn't a nose wheel steering tiller on the right side, the cockpit jumpseats aren't symmetrical...but like everyone has said, all of it adds up to imperceptible when it comes to flying.

Florianopolis wrote:

seat1a wrote:

Not sure how to phrase the question - but is a Boeing 787 or Airbus A321 without the airline customers configuration of seats, etc., perfectly balanced 50/50? If you were to draw a line down the middle of the plane, would both sides be equal in weight?

The airplane isn't symmetrical left/right, so no. The cargo doors add weight to the right side, the hydraulics and pneumatics bowels are not perfectly symmetrical, there probably isn't a nose wheel steering tiller on the right side, the cockpit jumpseats aren't symmetrical...but like everyone has said, all of it adds up to imperceptible when it comes to flying.

There are nose wheel steering tillers on both cockpit sides (just outboard of the sidestick on this picture)

https://www.airliners.net/photo/VivaAer ... o2lQ%3D%3D

A tiller is the least of your worries in a lateral (im)balance

The Global is certified to fly with wing fuel out of balance by max 1100#. Conceivably you could do this all day long without trouble.

ReverseFlow wrote:

kalvado wrote:

ReverseFlow wrote:

You will get a fuel imbalance alert if your tank balance left/right exceeds a threshold.

Can you give an idea of what that threshold is? I suspect around 1% of max fuel or so?

From here

https://www.boeing.com/commercial/aerom ... tonly.html

This table for example

https://www.boeing.com/commercial/aerom ... ble01.html

Well, for 737 an imbalance of 1000lb is about 3% of total fuel capacity.
And just to compare - if an arm of fuel tank is 1/3 of wing length, or 1/6 of wingspan = 6 m; and an arm for the window seat passenger is about 1.5 meter - total momentum of that imbalance is the same as 18 pax in window seats on one side without counterparts on the other. 739 has 32 rows in DL configuration
These are the back of envelope numbers, of course.

ReverseFlow wrote:

Florianopolis wrote:

seat1a wrote:

Not sure how to phrase the question - but is a Boeing 787 or Airbus A321 without the airline customers configuration of seats, etc., perfectly balanced 50/50? If you were to draw a line down the middle of the plane, would both sides be equal in weight?

The airplane isn't symmetrical left/right, so no. The cargo doors add weight to the right side, the hydraulics and pneumatics bowels are not perfectly symmetrical, there probably isn't a nose wheel steering tiller on the right side, the cockpit jumpseats aren't symmetrical...but like everyone has said, all of it adds up to imperceptible when it comes to flying.

There are nose wheel steering tillers on both cockpit sides (just outboard of the sidestick on this picture)

https://www.airliners.net/photo/VivaAer ... o2lQ%3D%3D

A tiller is the least of your worries in a lateral (im)balance

That depends on the aircraft. Lots of smaller airliners and business jets only have a tiller on the left hand side, e.g. the DC-9.