Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
r6russian wrote:Always measured off of north. Very rarely youll hear “callsign, turn 10 deg left” usually for traffic separation, but it happens. But 99% of the time they tell you what heading to turn to, and if critical, which way to turn
Imagine the CF it would be if every single turn command was in incremental vs absolute
N1120A wrote:I hear "turn 10/20 degrees left" all the time, especially being vectored to final on an approach. It gets you right where the controller wants, instead of them having to turn you again quickly because of wind shifts.
360 is North, 270 West, 180 South, 090 East. Everything in between. Usually you get a 0 at the end. Sometimes you get a 5. It is supposed to be the magnetic heading, but most ATC are primarily looking at ground track.
r6russian wrote:Always measured off of north. Very rarely youll hear “callsign, turn 10 deg left” usually for traffic separation, but it happens. But 99% of the time they tell you what heading to turn to, and if critical, which way to turn
Imagine the CF it would be if every single turn command was in incremental vs absolute
Starlionblue wrote:Headings are almost always magnetic, not true. Only in areas near the magnetic north pole will true headings be used.
.
Snuffaluffagus wrote:Starlionblue wrote:Headings are almost always magnetic, not true. Only in areas near the magnetic north pole will true headings be used.
.
IAHFLYR wrote:All ATC vectors or heading issued in the U.S., will be magnetic. The phrase used above of "turn 10 degrees left" can be used for traffic separation as mentioned however, it is used mostly when the controller does not know what your exact heading is and at times will be followed with "say new heading" so then they know exactly what your heading will be going forward. Terminal controllers have a fairly good idea of how the wind will impact the heading given so we correct if if need by, some by using the "turn 10 degrees right/left". Last thing ATC wants is to tell the pilot to turn right heading 240 and they are already heading 250!! Most professional pilots will question that instruction to verify the turn direction as a 350 degree turn in a congested airspace the wrong way will create a mess for all involved.
When I was controlling and didn't know the exact heading, but knew what the heading was I wanted the pilot to fly I'd simply say "fly heading 240" and the pilots make the shortest turn either left or right to get to that heading. Again, professional pilots as I've seen some low time private and student pilots make the big turn in the wrong direction so as a controller you have to know your audience so to speak.
With vectoring on downwind legs descending from say 10,000' to 3,000' the wind might have an impact as the aircraft descends and might not being on the desired track you want. With FMC's and GPS you might tell the pilot to "track 085" which keeps them on the same path until you're ready to turn them on a base leg, though not too many controller do that, but it has been heard and is a very effective tool rather than changing headings when you're very busy. For another conversation another time.
Woodreau wrote:Unless otherwise directed you turn the short way so when flying 360 you turn left to 270.
gregorygoodwin wrote:So, if you were flying a due north and were instructed to turn to 270 degrees, would you go right three quarters of the way around the circle , or turn left 90 degrees? As you can tell, I'm not a pilot, but it seems to me that in situations where the flight is told to make numerous course changes, it would get somewhat confusing.
Gregory
gregorygoodwin wrote:So, if you were flying a due north and were instructed to turn to 270 degrees, would you go right three quarters of the way around the circle , or turn left 90 degrees? As you can tell, I'm not a pilot, but it seems to me that in situations where the flight is told to make numerous course changes, it would get somewhat confusing.
Gregory
Woodreau wrote:Houston is like that departing 15s. They emphasize the right turn to 020 and if there’s any confusion they’ll say turn right the long way around to heading 020.
gregorygoodwin wrote:If you are on autopilot, flying due north and are told to turn to 270, you dial this in, does the flight computers also turn the short direction? Can you direct it to do otherwise?
AirKevin wrote:gregorygoodwin wrote:If you are on autopilot, flying due north and are told to turn to 270, you dial this in, does the flight computers also turn the short direction? Can you direct it to do otherwise?
It will turn in the direction you tell it to turn. So if you turn the heading select knob to the left, it will turn left. If you turn the heading select knob to the right, it will turn right.
AirKevin wrote:gregorygoodwin wrote:If you are on autopilot, flying due north and are told to turn to 270, you dial this in, does the flight computers also turn the short direction? Can you direct it to do otherwise?
It will turn in the direction you tell it to turn. So if you turn the heading select knob to the left, it will turn left. If you turn the heading select knob to the right, it will turn right.
gregorygoodwin wrote:Thanks for the answers. I assume that when you say you would turn the short direction, it means you, the pilot turn the yoke. If you are on autopilot, flying due north and are told to turn to 270, you dial this in, does the flight computers also turn the short direction? Can you direct it to do otherwise?
gregorygoodwin wrote:Thanks for the answers. I assume that when you say you would turn the short direction, it means you, the pilot turn the yoke. If you are on autopilot, flying due north and are told to turn to 270, you dial this in, does the flight computers also turn the short direction? Can you direct it to do otherwise?
GalaxyFlyer wrote:An INS alignment is interesting. Once started, the accelerometers sense eastward movement, fast at low altitudes, slower at high. Once it has enough movement sensed, 90 degrees to the left is the North Pole. There’s a lot more in the details, but essentially that’s it.
GalaxyFlyer wrote:Auto correct, yes latitudes, not altitudes.