Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
N1120A wrote:The TFR/semi prohibited area without permission in Dallas is indeed over George W. Bush's house, and a 1 no radius
adipasqu wrote:N1120A wrote:The TFR/semi prohibited area without permission in Dallas is indeed over George W. Bush's house, and a 1 no radius
Ah, I see his house now on the other side of Meaders Ln. Interesting that they don't center the TFR over his house, but I guess that might be for security reasons. Is P-49 over his ranch in Crawford?
ArcticFlyer wrote:Isn't a "permanent" TFR kind of a misnomer? It would seem to me that if a restriction is meant to be indefinite it should be charted as a restricted or prohibited area rather than relying on the apparently fickle NOTAM system.
GalaxyFlyer wrote:If it’s going to permanent, and the DFW TFR dates back to 2009, the FAA should follow the APA, file an NPRM, get comments, issue a final regulation. Not, work around the law.
adipasqu wrote:GalaxyFlyer wrote:If it’s going to permanent, and the DFW TFR dates back to 2009, the FAA should follow the APA, file an NPRM, get comments, issue a final regulation. Not, work around the law.
It's temporary...as long as he lives there...lol. It does seem inconsistent that P-49 is permanent over the ranch and there is a TFR over the house in Dallas.
These TFR's seem to be getting abused, however, all over the place. Just look at the one over Beale AFB, which is a weekly renewed TFR since like forever...just make restricted air space and get over the charade already.