Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR

 
sfjeff
Topic Author
Posts: 104
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 11:54 pm

Why Is New XNA Runway Not Parallel?

Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:40 pm

According to the XNA website (nwara.com), runway 17/35 was built to be an alternate landing surface to be used if runway 16/34 needs to be closed, which is a good idea since otherwise the airport would have to be closed. Is there a logical reason why 17/35 was built almost parallel to 16/34 and not parallel as 16R/34L? On the airport diagram, they look parallel to me (http://flightaware.com/resources/airport/KXNA/map).
Jeff in Málaga
 
erj
Posts: 142
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2001 11:22 am

RE: Why Is New XNA Runway Not Parallel?

Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:46 pm

Actually they are parallel. Look at the airport diagram and take note of the actual headings. I guess they changed the name as to not have to rename the original 16/34 to 16L/34R.
 
desertjets
Posts: 7693
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2000 3:12 pm

RE: Why Is New XNA Runway Not Parallel?

Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:49 pm

Quoting sfjeff (Thread starter):
they look parallel to me (http://flightaware.com/resources/airport/KXNA/map).

They look parallel b/c they are. Take a closer look at the chart and you'll see the compass headings on both runways are identical. Now as to why they didn't designate them L and R I haven't a clue. They also seem stupidly close together and wouldn't seem to give a huge capacity increase either -- except under strictly VFR conditions.
Stop drop and roll will not save you in hell. --- seen on a church marque in rural Virginia
 
ikramerica
Posts: 15100
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 9:33 am

RE: Why Is New XNA Runway Not Parallel?

Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:55 pm

LAX runways are parallel with 2 different designations. Granted at XNA it would have made more sense with 33 and 34...

Quoting desertjets (Reply 2):
They also seem stupidly close together and wouldn't seem to give a huge capacity increase either -- except under strictly VFR conditions.

And you can only cross to the new runway at the ends, and there is no real hold area, etc. Seems like a half-arsed upgrade.
Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
 
BMIFlyer
Posts: 8064
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 7:11 am

RE: Why Is New XNA Runway Not Parallel?

Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:56 pm

Quoting desertjets (Reply 2):
They also seem stupidly close together and wouldn't seem to give a huge capacity increase either -- except under strictly VFR conditions.

The reason they are so close together is because....

Quoting sfjeff (Thread starter):
runway 17/35 was built to be an alternate landing surface to be used if runway 16/34 needs to be closed
Sometimes You Can't Make It On Your Own
 
xjet
Posts: 424
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 10:09 am

RE: Why Is New XNA Runway Not Parallel?

Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:59 pm

Quoting desertjets (Reply 2):
They also seem stupidly close together and wouldn't seem to give a huge capacity increase either -- except under strictly VFR conditions.

It's not meant to be a capacity increase. It will only be used as a runway during the resurfacing of the main runway 16/34. It's going to be a taxiway in the future. The same procedure was used at RSW and CID when the runways needed to be rehabilitated.
 
RL757PVD
Posts: 3199
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 1999 2:47 am

RE: Why Is New XNA Runway Not Parallel?

Tue Jan 03, 2012 6:02 pm

Im pretty sure that this isnt a traditional parallel runway. The original plan many years ago was an ultimate parallel on the other side of the terminal. The problem is that the current runway is getting old (almost 20 years) and need to be rehabbed. Single runway airports like RSW had the same problem but they built the new taxiway for the new terminal and used the taxiway as a runway while the runway was repaired and repaved. At XNA they didnt have that luxury, so if you look at some stuff from the state (Arkansas Comission of Aeronautics) you will see the "parallel runway" infact referred to as an "Alternate Landing Surface".
Experience is what you get when what you thought would work out didn't!
 
desertjets
Posts: 7693
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2000 3:12 pm

RE: Why Is New XNA Runway Not Parallel?

Tue Jan 03, 2012 6:11 pm

Quoting xjet (Reply 5):
It's not meant to be a capacity increase. It will only be used as a runway during the resurfacing of the main runway 16/34. It's going to be a taxiway in the future. The same procedure was used at RSW and CID when the runways needed to be rehabilitated.

Ahhh... makes sense.
Stop drop and roll will not save you in hell. --- seen on a church marque in rural Virginia
 
sfjeff
Topic Author
Posts: 104
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 11:54 pm

RE: Why Is New XNA Runway Not Parallel?

Tue Jan 03, 2012 6:18 pm

Thanks for all the replies. I had wondered why they didn't just go ahead and build a parallel runway with adequate separation, but I can see that that would be much more expense considering the taxiways that would have to be built for it. And, I can also see that they can use a new taxiway for the existing runway, so the new alternate landing surface will not be a waste of money.
Jeff in Málaga
 
rfields5421
Posts: 6374
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 12:45 am

RE: Why Is New XNA Runway Not Parallel?

Tue Jan 03, 2012 11:23 pm

They are currently doing something like this for TKI - Collin County Regional at McKinney near Dallas. Using a different number designator rather than R/L makes it easier to decommission the taxiway used as a runway.
Not all who wander are lost.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: GalaxyFlyer and 11 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos