Moderators: richierich, ua900, hOMSaR

 
User avatar
clickhappy
Topic Author
Posts: 9164
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2001 12:10 pm

wide-angle images no longer acceptable?

Sat May 16, 2020 4:59 pm

Just a heads-up, I had a wide-angle image rejected for “inverse vignetting” and “distortion.” Anyone who has ever used a wide-angle lens on a perfect blue sky will know that a uniform sky color is impossible, given a wide enough field of view.

The appeal was rejected within minutes (“Screener rejection correct"), so there was no discussion amongst the HS.

It’s a shame really, as these are my favorite images to take. And I pride myself in not having any banding visible, always a difficult task in such shots.
 
JakTrax
Posts: 5179
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 3:30 am

Re: wide-angle images no longer acceptable?

Sat May 16, 2020 5:05 pm

Can I see the image, Royal? I too am keen on wide-angle shots...

Karl
 
User avatar
clickhappy
Topic Author
Posts: 9164
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2001 12:10 pm

Re: wide-angle images no longer acceptable?

Sat May 16, 2020 5:10 pm

Of course, just not sure on how to link it. Let me try this:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/0tuu08w2v0kgd ... Y.jpg?dl=0
 
JakTrax
Posts: 5179
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 3:30 am

Re: wide-angle images no longer acceptable?

Sat May 16, 2020 5:25 pm

That's ridiculous! The effect isn't optical or mechanical — it's the way light scatters naturally! Technically there's no such thing as 'reverse vignetting'...

Karl
 
dutchspotter1
Posts: 356
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 9:24 pm

Re: wide-angle images no longer acceptable?

Sat May 16, 2020 6:39 pm

The sky at the top looks quite dark and the a/c looks way, way out of proportion, so I'd agree with the screeners in this case.
NO URLS in signature
 
User avatar
Crosswindphoto
Posts: 331
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2018 5:21 pm

Re: wide-angle images no longer acceptable?

Sat May 16, 2020 6:50 pm

Personally I can see the banding, but no idea where the vignetting is coming from.

Tim
 
JakTrax
Posts: 5179
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 3:30 am

Re: wide-angle images no longer acceptable?

Sat May 16, 2020 7:23 pm

When shooting wide angle the sky at the top is going to be darker as the blue light is filtered through less atmosphere. I could understand if the rejection was down to optical or mechanical vignetting (which is down to the lens) but, in this instance, it's a natural and unavoidable phenomenon, attributed to physics rather than the photographer. You can negate it by using filters but it's never been an issue here until now. Quite by coincidence I'm going to use some of the latest HKT beach shots as examples, in which the same effect can be seen in the sky (plus way more distortion of the aircraft).

Seems we've reached a point at which rejections for the stupidest things are commonplace while the really serious issues are being missed. Bottom line: either the screeners are now seeking images that go beyond what's possible with contemporary camera gear, or they are not fully understanding how physics affects light.

Finally, I can see the banding (it's only slight) but, given the other rejection reasons, it's pretty irrelevant.
 
dutchspotter1
Posts: 356
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 9:24 pm

Re: wide-angle images no longer acceptable?

Sat May 16, 2020 7:35 pm

JakTrax wrote:
...the screeners are now seeking images that go beyond what's possible with contemporary camera gear...

You mean a normal 50mm photo that wouldn't have these issues? ;)
NO URLS in signature
 
JakTrax
Posts: 5179
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 3:30 am

Re: wide-angle images no longer acceptable?

Sat May 16, 2020 7:59 pm

Even at 50mm on a FF body you can get the 'reverse vignetting' effect in the sky. Atmospheric conditions and the limits of physics by themselves should not be grounds for rejections. There are thousands of images in the database in which the subject is equally or more distorted than in Royal's shot.

Let's look at what this rejection is basically saying: photos shot at less than, say, 35mm will no longer be acceptable due to the way both light and camera optics work. Well I guess that settles the HKT beach shot argument then, because most of them are wide-angle, with 'reverse vignetting' and distortion...

https://www.airliners.net/photo/Thai-Ai ... Zs2w4W2TGL

Now unless the curvature of the Earth is visible at a distance of only a few miles I'd say that horizon features unavoidable distortion. It would be good to get screener clarification because this has to be either a mistake or a misunderstanding, surely?
 
User avatar
Kaphias
Posts: 706
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 6:29 am

Re: wide-angle images no longer acceptable?

Mon May 18, 2020 10:19 pm



Should be acceptable like this?

Ahh nevermind, motive for blocking the aircraft...
 
User avatar
jelpee
Head Screener
Posts: 1040
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 1:34 am

Re: wide-angle images no longer acceptable?

Mon May 18, 2020 11:54 pm

The issue of the dark band of sky with the use of wide angled lenses is under presently under review and discussion by the Head Screening team.
Royal, regardless of the dark band at the top of the frame, your image was also rejected for having a soft nose area. Additionally, while not called out, the image shows visible banding, and if I had handled the appeal, would likely have cited that as a reason as well.

Personally, I agree with the unavoidable nature of the dark band. In some cases however, it is too dark and is distracting. We're trying to establish some boundary samples to help the screeners improve consistency.

In summary, Wide Angled shots such as yours are acceptable, not withstanding other flaws.

Jehan
Airliners.net Crew - Photo Screener
 
User avatar
KPDX
Posts: 2483
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 10:04 am

Re: wide-angle images no longer acceptable?

Tue May 19, 2020 12:18 am

Kaphias wrote:


Should be acceptable like this?

Ahh nevermind, motive for blocking the aircraft...


I don't care what anyone says... that photoshop sums it up majestically.... :spit: :lol:
 
JakTrax
Posts: 5179
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 3:30 am

Re: wide-angle images no longer acceptable?

Tue May 19, 2020 2:24 am

Fair point re the soft nose, Jehan, but what would have happened had the nose area been sufficiently sharp, given that the sky in Royal's photo is no more distracting than in Andrew's latest beach shots?

Surely it would have to be pretty distracting to warrant a rejection?

Karl
 
len90
Posts: 1148
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 1:03 pm

Re: wide-angle images no longer acceptable?

Tue May 19, 2020 2:04 pm

JakTrax wrote:
Fair point re the soft nose, Jehan, but what would have happened had the nose area been sufficiently sharp, given that the sky in Royal's photo is no more distracting than in Andrew's latest beach shots?

Surely it would have to be pretty distracting to warrant a rejection?

Karl

The banding in Royal's image is way less than I have seen in the IMHO (In my honest opinion) distracting and annoying beach pose pictures from Andrew.

I really wish the site would enforce the same rules for EVERY photographer regardless of their affiliation, title, name, etc. Seeing things like this is only chasing people away and in turn will decrease any profitability from potential ad revenue.
Len90
 
angad84
Posts: 2076
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 3:04 pm

Re: wide-angle images no longer acceptable?

Thu May 28, 2020 12:07 am

There's definitely banding, and possibly borderline "inverse vignetting" (lens correction?) but no more offensive that many, many other shots, as Karl has pointed out. Not just the Phuket ones, but many others have snuck through, I can't imagine nitpicking this. Honestly never noticed the soft nose.
 
User avatar
clickhappy
Topic Author
Posts: 9164
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2001 12:10 pm

Re: wide-angle images no longer acceptable?

Thu Jun 11, 2020 6:45 pm

Two more wide-angle rejections for "Vignetting."

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 042535.jpg

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 042461.jpg

So yeah, wide-angle images, at least those with a blue sky, are no longer welcome at airliners.net

Good job.
 
dutchspotter1
Posts: 356
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 9:24 pm

Re: wide-angle images no longer acceptable?

Thu Jun 11, 2020 8:46 pm

Try uploading them as "creative image" (Mark for Creative Screening Team).
NO URLS in signature
 
JakTrax
Posts: 5179
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 3:30 am

Re: wide-angle images no longer acceptable?

Thu Jun 11, 2020 9:36 pm

I must admit, the right side in both images (particularly the ER4) does look brighter than I'd expect and my wide-angle lenses certainly control the effect much better. That said, I don't think it should be grounds for rejection.
 
User avatar
jelpee
Head Screener
Posts: 1040
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 1:34 am

Re: wide-angle images no longer acceptable?

Thu Jun 11, 2020 9:40 pm

Did you consider appealing? The Tri State looks underexposed though.

Jehan
Airliners.net Crew - Photo Screener
 
JakTrax
Posts: 5179
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 3:30 am

Re: wide-angle images no longer acceptable?

Thu Jun 11, 2020 9:51 pm

Jehan, the ER4 has a grey/silver fuselage, not white — if you look at the aircraft behind the exposure looks fine.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos