Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
cpd wrote:Hmm, not sure that’s right - a plane of which there is only one in operational existence shouldn’t ever get the ‘common’ tag IMO, regardless of the rules. It’s so common that I’ve never seen it.
Yes, I know a second AN225 technically exists, so I’ve narrowed my comment above to prevent nitpicking.
For the image we would have to see how it looks.