Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR

 
flynavy
Topic Author
Posts: 2179
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2002 1:48 am

Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Tue Aug 26, 2008 5:29 am

Topic is self-explanatory.

What do you all think of this shot under the new rules?

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3280/2798367057_e5b121465c_o.jpg

Also, are crops like this acceptable now?

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3111/2688864046_03e792df06_o.jpg

Thanks,
Chris

[Edited 2008-08-25 22:39:27]
Change is: one airline, six continents!
 
othic
Posts: 140
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 12:33 am

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Tue Aug 26, 2008 8:22 am

A boy learn's much more at the airport then he do at school
 
boeingfreak
Posts: 381
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 7:07 pm

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Tue Aug 26, 2008 9:01 am

Hi Chris,
just my opinion: Both are nice pics and if they were mine I'd upload them. If they get in, great, if not, well then upload to ATI and make money  

@Othic: I'd resize it down to 1024 or 1000 pix, quality just isn't there to upload it at 1200.

Cheers,
Florian   


EDIT: Forgot to ask: What about this one now, acceptable under the new creativity rules?

Big version: Width: 500 Height: 333 File size: 183kb


[Edited 2008-08-26 02:02:17]
 
timdegroot
Posts: 3258
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2002 10:37 pm

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Tue Aug 26, 2008 10:53 am



Quoting Flynavy (Thread starter):
What do you all think of this shot under the new rules?

I like both

Quoting Othic (Reply 1):
http://img409.imageshack.us/my.php?image=s5aafogz8.jpg

looks good
Alderman Exit
 
timdegroot
Posts: 3258
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2002 10:37 pm

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Tue Aug 26, 2008 11:06 am



Quoting Boeingfreak (Reply 2):
EDIT: Forgot to ask: What about this one now, acceptable under the new creativity rules?

I like it.

pre-screening makes difficult in these cases though as images are going t be discussed by more people. All I can do is say whether I personally would find them acceptable or not.

Tim
Alderman Exit
 
mnazarinia
Posts: 98
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 6:40 am

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Tue Aug 26, 2008 1:06 pm

Dear All,

Can I get your opinions on this shot please?
https://www.airliners.net/addphotos/middle/ready/IMG_7609_ver1.jpg

Thanks,
Mehdi.
 
deaphen
Posts: 1090
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 3:57 am

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Tue Aug 26, 2008 1:45 pm

Opinions?

https://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/IMG_0138klm1.jpg

a tad bit grainy?

Nitin
I want every single airport and airplane in India to be on A.net!
 
flynavy
Topic Author
Posts: 2179
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2002 1:48 am

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Tue Aug 26, 2008 2:28 pm



Quoting Boeingfreak (Reply 2):

I sure hope so - that shot is awesome!
Change is: one airline, six continents!
 
User avatar
EZEIZA
Posts: 4421
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 12:09 am

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:42 pm

These shots are awesome  bigthumbsup 
That's what this new rule should be about
Carp aunque ganes o pierdas ...
 
boeingfreak
Posts: 381
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 7:07 pm

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:45 pm

Thanks for your nice words, Chris and thank you also for your opinion, Tim! I'll upload it and see what happens!  Smile

Quoting Deaphen (Reply 6):
Opinions?

Woooow, one hell of a great pic! I'd add some cw rotation though...
 
ANITIX87
Posts: 2998
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 4:52 am

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Tue Aug 26, 2008 4:50 pm



Quoting Mnazarinia (Reply 5):
Can I get your opinions on this shot please?

Way too small. We need to see the full-size uploaded image (at least 1024 pixels across, and maximum 1600).

TIS
www.stellaryear.com: Canon EOS 50D, Canon EOS 5DMkII, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 24-70 2.8L II, Canon 100mm 2.8L, Canon 100-4
 
flynavy
Topic Author
Posts: 2179
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2002 1:48 am

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Tue Aug 26, 2008 9:22 pm

What do you all think of this simulator shot I dug up? Took it last year...

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3040/2799669567_4918170cd6_o.jpg

As well as this shot of B-HUL. Thoughts?

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3257/2659393870_883bc5fa40_o.jpg

[Edited 2008-08-26 14:31:17]
Change is: one airline, six continents!
 
User avatar
jgr
Screener
Posts: 112
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 9:39 pm

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Tue Aug 26, 2008 10:15 pm

Hi Medhi,

Quoting Mnazarinia (Reply 5):

Can I get your opinions on this shot please?
https://www.airliners.net/addphotos/m...1.jpg

On the small photo you show us I think A/C is not centered (a bit low in frame) and picture is a bit dark : only my opinion !

Regards,
Javier
Airbus A380-881 for 1.000 passengers !
 
flynavy
Topic Author
Posts: 2179
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2002 1:48 am

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Tue Aug 26, 2008 10:22 pm

How's this for being creative?

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3275/2800517250_55f158cbd6_o.jpg

 bigthumbsup 
Change is: one airline, six continents!
 
User avatar
jgr
Screener
Posts: 112
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 9:39 pm

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Tue Aug 26, 2008 10:29 pm



Quoting Flynavy (Reply 13):
How's this for being creative?

Wow ! 100% creative


Javier  Wink
Airbus A380-881 for 1.000 passengers !
 
ANITIX87
Posts: 2998
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 4:52 am

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Wed Aug 27, 2008 2:23 am



Quoting Flynavy (Reply 11):
As well as this shot of B-HUL. Thoughts?

Maybe a bit more contrast. Looks a little flat. Nose may also be a tad soft.

TIS
www.stellaryear.com: Canon EOS 50D, Canon EOS 5DMkII, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 24-70 2.8L II, Canon 100mm 2.8L, Canon 100-4
 
NIKV69
Posts: 13696
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 4:27 am

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Wed Aug 27, 2008 3:13 am



Quoting Flynavy (Reply 13):
How's this for being creative?

You nailed it Chris! I would upload.
I am the Googlizer!!!
 
flynavy
Topic Author
Posts: 2179
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2002 1:48 am

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Wed Aug 27, 2008 3:15 am



Quoting ANITIX87 (Reply 15):

How's this? Kicked up the contrast a few clicks...

http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a350/refleckt/BHUL_prescreen_1.jpg
Change is: one airline, six continents!
 
damien846
Posts: 629
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 2:45 am

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:00 am

 
User avatar
jgr
Screener
Posts: 112
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 9:39 pm

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:24 am

Kinda shots Damien !
Javier
Airbus A380-881 for 1.000 passengers !
 
EMA747
Posts: 997
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 6:01 am

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Wed Aug 27, 2008 4:36 pm

Can you guys please give me some opinions on these two?

http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e312/thegreek2213/079.jpg

http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e312/thegreek2213/005-2.jpg

Thanks.

Andy S
Failing doesn’t make you a failure. Giving up and refusing to try again does!
 
User avatar
airkas1
Posts: 7904
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Wed Aug 27, 2008 5:07 pm



Quoting EMA747 (Reply 20):
Can you guys please give me some opinions on these two?

1: Level (bigtime) and it seems a bit darkish
2: Motive (catering truck & loading device)
 
EMA747
Posts: 997
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 6:01 am

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Wed Aug 27, 2008 5:45 pm



Quoting AirKas1 (Reply 21):

Thanks for the reply.

The first one was kind of in the shaddow of the viewing deck so I though it might be a bit too dark.

No chance for the second one then?

Is the sharpening ok? This is one of the main things I want to know as I am on a new laptop.

Andy S
Failing doesn’t make you a failure. Giving up and refusing to try again does!
 
Chamer
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 10:09 pm

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:07 pm

https://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/CM140708078.jpg

First time posting, have this one in the que at the moment. I have never had a picture accepted and have a crappy 4M camera. I have had many problem. My first uploads where very bad and my PS skill have improved since the start. I would be delighted to hear some view as the e-mails from the screeners tend to be brief sometimes leaving me confused. Will have new camera soon Sony A200 which hopefully will improve my sucess rate.
 
User avatar
FYODOR
Posts: 713
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 4:13 am

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:09 pm

Hi folks,

Is that kind of shots are accaptable for the new creative rules?

Big version: Width: 690 Height: 1024 File size: 266kb


Permission from people is granted indeed.

Your advises are very welcome!

Regards,

Fyodor
 
User avatar
TupolevTu154
Posts: 1932
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 6:00 pm

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:21 pm



Quoting FYODOR (Reply 24):

It looks like you've used alot of shadow/highlight in that shot!

Quoting Chamer (Reply 23):

Not bad at all for a newbie! You have exactly the right idea, but the photograph lacks sufficient quality.

As for me:

https://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/IMG_4898edit2.jpg

Tom Big grin
 
flynavy
Topic Author
Posts: 2179
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2002 1:48 am

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:29 pm



Quoting Flynavy (Reply 13):

The thing is - I'm not sure that flight simulators are acceptable here. I emailed the screeners about this but as yet have received no response.
Change is: one airline, six continents!
 
User avatar
aadc10137
Posts: 181
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 8:22 pm

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:32 pm

Hey Guys,
I haven't had a need to use the pre-screen thread for a while, but I need opinions on this airport overview as it is my first one. It is showing the new runway at ORD. Any critiques would be helpful..Thanks!!



Andy

[Edited 2008-08-27 14:46:13]
777 767 DC10 MD11 DC-9 CRJ700 727 E145 737 747 ATR72 ATR42 A319 A320
 
mnazarinia
Posts: 98
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 6:40 am

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:00 am



Quoting ANITIX87 (Reply 10):

Quoting Mnazarinia (Reply 5):
Can I get your opinions on this shot please?

Way too small. We need to see the full-size uploaded image (at least 1024 pixels across, and maximum 1600).

TIS

Oh sorry here is the maximum res I have uploaded:
https://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/IMG_7609_ver1.jpg

Thanks,
Mehdi.
 
andrewC75
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 12:21 pm

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:22 am

OK... I've finally bitten the bullet and started editing on a half decent monitor, and I've also gone back and looked at the suggested workflow and tried to adhere more strictly to it. Let's see how I did with some reprocessing:

Previously rejected for soft:
https://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/IMG_8510_DL_752_N682DA_ATL_1024_v2.JPG

Previously rejected for quality, contrast, level:
[removed from queue]

[Edited 2008-08-27 18:34:22]
 
flynavy
Topic Author
Posts: 2179
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2002 1:48 am

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:25 am



Quoting AndrewC75 (Reply 29):

Andrew - any chance you could provide the originals? You have my email.

At first glance number 1 has some quality issues, slightly grainy.

No. 2 - is this the full size image? Looks a bit small.
Change is: one airline, six continents!
 
andrewC75
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 12:21 pm

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:26 am



Quoting Mnazarinia (Reply 28):

Oh sorry here is the maximum res I have uploaded:
https://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/IMG_7609_ver1.jpg

Unfortunately, this one doesn't have a chance. There's heat-haze around the wings, it's extremely grainy on the bottom, and it generally doesn't stand out from the background. On a sunny day, this photo might be salvageable.
 
flynavy
Topic Author
Posts: 2179
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2002 1:48 am

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:29 am



Quoting Mnazarinia (Reply 28):

Challenging lighting conditions for sure - care to provide the original file? Can't really comment until we see the original.
Change is: one airline, six continents!
 
andrewC75
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 12:21 pm

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:31 am



Quoting Flynavy (Reply 30):

Andrew - any chance you could provide the originals? You have my email.

Headed your way shortly.

Quoting Flynavy (Reply 30):
No. 2 - is this the full size image? Looks a bit small.

Drat! I saved it at 800px for something else and accidentally uploaded that one. I'll have to re-upload.
 
mnazarinia
Posts: 98
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 6:40 am

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:24 am



Quoting AndrewC75 (Reply 31):

Quoting Mnazarinia (Reply 28):

Oh sorry here is the maximum res I have uploaded:
https://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/IMG_7609_ver1.jpg

Unfortunately, this one doesn't have a chance. There's heat-haze around the wings, it's extremely grainy on the bottom, and it generally doesn't stand out from the background. On a sunny day, this photo might be salvageable.



Quoting Flynavy (Reply 32):
Quoting Mnazarinia (Reply 28):

Challenging lighting conditions for sure - care to provide the original file? Can't really comment until we see the original.

Thanks all for your comments, I know the weather was not good at that day, you know here is Winter in down under, Melbourne!
Definitely I am going to remove it from queue but BTW here is the original version:
Big version: Width: 3888 Height: 2592 File size: 1852kb


Cheers,
Mehdi.
 
ANITIX87
Posts: 2998
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 4:52 am

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:05 am



Quoting Flynavy (Reply 17):

How's this? Kicked up the contrast a few clicks...

Still needs a bit more. The tires should be almost black, unless there was a reflective object below that shot the sun up from underneath, but it doesn't look like there was.

Quoting Chamer (Reply 23):
First time posting, have this one in the que at the moment.

Sorry, it just doesn't have sufficient quality. The cockpit windows look a bit bizarre (heat haze?) and the shot would also need some CW rotation anyway. I think this shot is for your personal collection only, unfortunately.

Quoting TupolevTu154 (Reply 25):
As for me:

I love the shot, but it's far too backlit. Try adding some "fill light" in photoshop or Lightroom, depending on which you use, but I think this shot may be a lost cause. It's very, very tough to get backlit shots accepted here. Mine, for example, was luck of the draw as I got a screener who liked it as much as I did.

Quoting Mnazarinia (Reply 28):
Oh sorry here is the maximum res I have uploaded:

Link doesn't work.

Quoting AndrewC75 (Reply 29):

Previously rejected for soft:

Yes. I believe this shot was way too blurry to begin with and cannot be saved regardless of how much sharpening you apply. Personal collection, I'm afraid.

TIS
www.stellaryear.com: Canon EOS 50D, Canon EOS 5DMkII, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 24-70 2.8L II, Canon 100mm 2.8L, Canon 100-4
 
whappeh
Posts: 1058
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 4:47 am

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Thu Aug 28, 2008 7:07 am

How is this for a creative shot? It was once rejected before for motive, but I gave it a new crop, and with the new rules, maybe it stands a chance.

http://img172.imageshack.us/img172/134/n6972cbigtixcreative1pf9.jpg
-Travel now, journey infinitely.
 
mnazarinia
Posts: 98
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 6:40 am

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Thu Aug 28, 2008 7:07 am



Quoting ANITIX87 (Reply 35):
Quoting Mnazarinia (Reply 28):
Oh sorry here is the maximum res I have uploaded:

Link doesn't work.

Big version: Width: 3888 Height: 2592 File size: 1852kb
 
User avatar
TupolevTu154
Posts: 1932
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 6:00 pm

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Thu Aug 28, 2008 8:47 am



Quoting ANITIX87 (Reply 35):
I love the shot, but it's far too backlit. Try adding some "fill light" in photoshop or Lightroom, depending on which you use, but I think this shot may be a lost cause. It's very, very tough to get backlit shots accepted here. Mine, for example, was luck of the draw as I got a screener who liked it as much as I did.

That was my intention, to get a silhouette of the aircraft with just the burners showing.

Oh well, I think I'll leave it in there for now  Smile

Tom Big grin
 
User avatar
TupolevTu154
Posts: 1932
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 6:00 pm

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Thu Aug 28, 2008 9:44 am

And another one from me;

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3201/2802182697_1f2711bbe8_o.jpg

(Click for the proper version)

Fire away!

Tom Big grin
 
jfktowerfan
Editor
Posts: 982
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 12:58 am

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:06 pm

"creative" or crap?
Big version: Width: 815 Height: 1024 File size: 349kb


Corey
C'mon Man
 
Jetfreak
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 3:45 am

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:08 pm



Quoting JFKTOWERFAN (Reply 40):

It's a high quality shot, but I think it looks a bit weird that you don't see the other engine.

Regards,

Jetfreak
 
User avatar
EZEIZA
Posts: 4421
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 12:09 am

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:58 pm



Quoting JFKTOWERFAN (Reply 40):
"creative" or crap?

Not blurry enough  duck   Wink

I think the quality is very nice to see, but as a person that likes to surf around enjoying aviation pictures, I personally don't like something that is so cut off.

regards  Smile
Carp aunque ganes o pierdas ...
 
NWA783
Posts: 100
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 11:11 am

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Thu Aug 28, 2008 7:03 pm

I would have to agree with EZEIZA, in that there is so little of the plane showing. Maybe with more of the other wing it might stand a better chance.

- Josh -
"I'd like to give a pilot report" " Ok go ahead sir" "Its a beautiful day in the neighborhood"
 
User avatar
FYODOR
Posts: 713
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 4:13 am

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Thu Aug 28, 2008 8:17 pm



Quoting TupolevTu154 (Reply 25):
It looks like you've used alot of shadow/highlight in that shot!

Not realy. I used curves but such light is the result of 1/1 flash.
 
deradere
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 3:55 am

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Thu Aug 28, 2008 8:48 pm

Hi a.netters,

is it wrong to crop like that? (I thought the window frame is not much of interest but I wanted to leave it in to give it more of a "sitting in a B744" feeling.)

What do you think?

http://www.lars-tretau.de/forumbilder/DSC_5733.jpg

I guess I screwed up because after leveling I can't manage to keep the whole frame line in crop (well at least not in 3:4 ratio, and as I understand there is no way... or other more suitable formats I could use.)


Lars
Using Nikon equip.
 
iamlucky13
Posts: 1263
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:35 pm

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Thu Aug 28, 2008 10:28 pm

Rats...second rejection on this one. First time was "quality, soft." This time just "soft."

I think I improved it greatly after the first, almost unedited submission, and now I'm unsure which parts are too soft. It looks like just a bit over the nose, and of course the background, which is natural since it's outside the depth of focus and I was panning.

Any suggestions how to improve it? Much more sharpening and it will start showing jaggies and look artificial.

Might it be worth an appeal, especially since there's only 1 picture in the DB of this aircraft actually in flight? Or maybe a screener mistook the blurry light pole behind the cockpit as part of the aircraft?

https://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20080828_080714_p3_liftoff.jpg
 
braby
Posts: 95
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 5:05 am

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Fri Aug 29, 2008 9:10 am

Can i get some opions on whether this shot would make the grade?

Big version: Width: 1200 Height: 800 File size: 802kb


Regards
Braby
 
Jetfreak
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 3:45 am

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Fri Aug 29, 2008 10:47 am



Quoting Braby (Reply 47):

i think it's a bit underexposed, but i'm not really sure about that.

Regards,
Jetfreak
 
User avatar
acontador
Posts: 1397
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 11:54 pm

RE: Pre-Screening Thread No. 3

Fri Aug 29, 2008 1:52 pm

Hi,

Quoting TupolevTu154 (Reply 39):
And another one from me;

An interesting picture, but quality is really on the edge here, and in the end, by fully including the rotor blades, the helo itself becomes rather distant.

Quoting JFKTOWERFAN (Reply 40):
"creative" or crap?

Crap crop, crap light, crap quality - you choose...

Quoting Deradere (Reply 45):
is it wrong to crop like that?

Yes. For such a shot to get in, you'll need the full window frame visible, no reflections (you have a lot), much higher quality and hopefully something more interesting to see that a big wing and some blue sky  Wink .

Quoting Iamlucky13 (Reply 46):
Any suggestions how to improve it?

Not worth an appeal right now, but nothing more needed but a few minutes of careful selective sharpening being applied to the softer areas.

Quoting Braby (Reply 47):
Can i get some opinions on whether this shot would make the grade?

It won't - would be rejected for soft and contrast.

I think that was 'short and sweet' enough  devil  .
Just sit back, relax and have a glass of Merlot...enjoy your life!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos