Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Quoting len90 (Reply 1): Only concern I have: How will this work with photographers who just want to go down to MIA for a few days? |
Quoting KPWMSpotter (Reply 5): At airports like Miami though, the airport authority was already very amicable to the spotting community. |
Quoting KPWMSpotter (Reply 5): Establishing the Airport Watch didn't grant the photographers any additional rights, it only legitimized the security paranoia on the part of the airport authority. I really, really hope that I never have a conversation with the Miami Police which goes something like "Are you part of the Airport Watch? No? Okay, you'll have to move on..." |
Quoting KPWMSpotter (Reply 5): Establishing the Airport Watch didn't grant the photographers any additional rights, it only legitimized the security paranoia on the part of the airport authority. I really, really hope that I never have a conversation with the Miami Police which goes something like "Are you part of the Airport Watch? No? Okay, you'll have to move on..." |
Quoting KPWMSpotter (Reply 5): At airports like O'Hare, where spotters were previously shunned and run off by Police |
Quoting KPWMSpotter (Reply 5): The last thing we need at the airport fence is a spotter with a sense of authority, bothering the police or bothering other law abiding citizens. We also can't let the airport police begin to think that all spotters need to be "registered" in order to participate in the hobby. |
Quoting KPWMSpotter (Reply 5): The last thing we need at the airport fence is a spotter with a sense of authority, bothering the police or bothering other law abiding citizens. We also can't let the airport police begin to think that all spotters need to be "registered" in order to participate in the hobby. |
Quoting eksath (Reply 5): Then you obviously don't know the rest of the story. |
Quoting KPWMSpotter (Reply 6): If this is what is needed to satisfy the airport authority, certainly I have no problems with it. I'm just disheartened by the increasing security paranoia around aviation these days.. |
Quoting eksath (Reply 3): |
Quoting jelpee (Reply 8): |
Quoting NASCARAirforce (Reply 9): I had the same concern that cops would go after anyone not wearing a pink badge (why pink?) and sending them away |
Quoting NASCARAirforce (Reply 9): a pink badge (why pink?) |
Quoting NASCARAirforce (Reply 9): Another concern I have is - someone from the airport watch group that might have a personal problem with someone not in the group, would they try to rat that person out to get rid of the undesirables? |
Quoting NASCARAirforce (Reply 9): That is the point another person said if power got to someone's head in the group. |
Quoting jelpee (Reply 8): Congratulations on getting this off the ground! |
Quoting topgun3 (Reply 10): As a member of Airport Watch at another major airport, I have to say that the concept works and both photographers and airport authority benefit from this mutual cooperation. The photographers get access to the perimeter of the airport (and sometimes special infield photo tours for special arrivals) and the airport authority gets extra set of eyes helping to discourage unwanted characters from around the airport. We also help inform the airport about open gates and bird activity that might put aircraft in danger. |
Quoting KPWMSpotter (Reply 4): Please see my responses above and digest my responses. I hope i have made myself clear on the status of MIA as it stands. |
Quoting drummer (Reply 17): I'm a little bit confused... Is spotting at The Holes and El Dorado still accessable for everyone? |
Quoting eksath (Reply 18): The holes is open. El dorado is open but only the area that is public property. It is in a state of flux due to late night parties that have started happening there which have caused a lot of trouble to the businesses there . The furniture store has now closed off the lot hence cars cannot park there. Parking must happen on the public road. There is more police action but currently there is no plans to kick everyone out. We hope to be a buffer to stop that from happening. Bearing some dramatic unpredictable event, both places should be open in May. |
Quoting greenjet (Reply 20): I arrived at the Holes yesterday at 3.30pm. Around 4pm a uniformed gentleman airside in a Miami Dade truck pulled over to the fence and told myself and another gentleman (watching the aircraft with his young kid) standing nearby that we were not allowed to be there. We were told that we were not allowed to stand near the perimeter fence and told to watch the action from the other side of the road. Not much good for photography! I politely responded that the sign beside me said 'photography permitted in this area'. He paused for a few seconds and then just reiterated that we had to leave. I didn't want to escalate things so I begrudgingly left with a bitter taste in my mouth. It was actually the first time I've had a problem in all my years of aviation photography. |
Quoting greenjet (Reply 22): Eksath, many thanks for the response. I have sent you an email |
Quoting KPWMSpotter (Reply 4): At airports like O'Hare, where spotters were previously shunned and run off by Police, I see the Airport Watch as a valid construct which legitimized the hobby and gave the photographers some new rights. At O'Hare, the Airport Watch was a necessary evil or sorts. |