Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR

 
korpenko
Topic Author
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:22 am

Sell It Or Not?

Mon Mar 24, 2014 8:41 am

Hi
I had bought initially a 75-300 for my Canon 60D. The version without IS nor USM.
It had brought me some quality pictures (one accepted picture, one that needs re-editing) but I wasn't completely satisfied of the F5.6 and of the autofocus so I bought a 70-200 F4L IS USM.
It seems that the 70-200 can reveal more details at 200mm than the other one at 300mm
Here is a bottle of Powerade, two 100% crops from the two lenses, full aperture for the F4L and best aperture (F8) for the other one


Should I sell the 75-300 ? I am under the impression that the 70-200, despite its shorter focal length, can only give me better results, even if I have to crop.
 
angad84
Posts: 2135
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 3:04 pm

RE: Sell It Or Not?

Mon Mar 24, 2014 4:23 pm

The 70-200 f4L IS is a beast of a lens. I use it almost exclusively when I have good access levels and don't need the reach of a longer lens (400mm+ usually goes for air shows and the like).

So yes, the 75-300 is pretty much redundant when paired with any of the 70-200L lenses.

Cheers
Angad
 
ckw
Posts: 4586
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 12:26 am

RE: Sell It Or Not?

Mon Mar 24, 2014 4:48 pm

Sell it and buy a 1.4 convertor. You'll then have a 5.6 zoom capable of going to 280mm and I think you'll find the quality still better than the 75-300

Cheers,

Colin
 
vikkyvik
Posts: 12665
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:58 pm

RE: Sell It Or Not?

Mon Mar 24, 2014 5:01 pm

Quoting ckw (Reply 2):
Sell it and buy a 1.4 convertor. You'll then have a 5.6 zoom capable of going to 280mm and I think you'll find the quality still better than the 75-300

I have sporadic success with the 1.4. But if the 75-300 is the cheap Canon lens, you'll probably get just as good results, if not better, with the 70-200 at 200mm.

I have the 70-300 IS USM, and it's utterly useless above 250mm. The 70-200 F4L totally knocks it out, even wide open at F4.
 
len90
Posts: 1174
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 1:03 pm

RE: Sell It Or Not?

Tue Mar 25, 2014 11:51 pm

You also are comparing two lenses that are in separate levels. The 70-200 is an L lens and probably one of the best lenses on the market, definitely the best lens I have ever used. I personally like it better than my 100-400L, but the 100-400 gives me the extra reach that is something I need to have. Now the 75-300 is one of Canon's entry level lenses. The quality of the glass in it is inferior to that of the L lens.

My overall thinking: you get what you pay for.
 
korpenko
Topic Author
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:22 am

RE: Sell It Or Not?

Wed Mar 26, 2014 1:48 am

Yes, but I would have thought the extra magnification of the 300mm could get me more details than 135mm.
I did some testing and it turns out I have the same level of details with 300mm F8 and 135mm F4. Now I knew the L series was way better but I couldn't have guessed it would be so huge.
Plus it seems I can sell it for 150 AUD which is pretty satisfying !!

By the way, would you prefer a 70-200 + 1.4x extender or your 100-400L ?
I don't know if I will buy the 100 400 or if it will replace my 70 200. I might just buy a good extender, which will be way cheaper.
 
angad84
Posts: 2135
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 3:04 pm

RE: Sell It Or Not?

Wed Mar 26, 2014 4:41 am

Quoting korpenko (Reply 5):
By the way, would you prefer a 70-200 + 1.4x extender or your 100-400L ?

Definitely the 100-400L, at least in my experience. I'm not a huge fan of teleconverters and the sharpness hit and reduction in AF speed that comes with them.

If you can get a good copy of the 100-400L, it will outperform the 70-200L (with or without the extender) for distant subjects. Of course, getting a good copy is easier said than done.

Cheers
Angad
 
ckw
Posts: 4586
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 12:26 am

RE: Sell It Or Not?

Wed Mar 26, 2014 9:38 pm

Hmm I'd pick the current 200-70 f4 with a 1.4x over the 100-400 any day. Though I will agree that with the 2x it doesn't quite match up.

Cheers,

Colin
 
korpenko
Topic Author
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:22 am

RE: Sell It Or Not?

Thu Mar 27, 2014 6:30 am

The main advantage of the 1.4x is that it costs much cheaper. I have read that some extenders are cheaper and better than the Canon one. So if the quality is not drastically reduced I will go for an extender.
(The first picture I had accepted in the DB was taken with a 75$ 75-300mm F4-5.6 III)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos