RonS
Topic Author
Posts: 727
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:22 pm

Article - Captain's Personal Camera Near Crash

Tue Mar 24, 2015 2:27 pm

Scary. I thought this may be of some interest here...

Positioning Of Captain’s Personal
Camera Caused Near Crash Of U.K. A330
LONDON—The U.K. Military Aviation
Authority (MAA) is calling for changes in the culture
and behavior of aircrews after it found the near loss of one
of the U.K.’s Airbus A330 tanker aircraft was caused by
the positioning of the captain’s personal camera.
In its March 23 report, the MAA describes how the Airbus
A330-200 Voyager multi-role tanker transport came
close to being lost with all 198 passengers and crew
onboard.
The incident took place during a trooping flight to Afghanistan
on Feb. 9 last year. A crash was narrowly avoided
thanks to the aircraft’s flight envelope protection system,
the report says.
The MAA says the aircraft, operated by the Airtanker
consortium on behalf of the U.K. Royal Air Force (RAF)
but being flown by a RAF crew, was over the Black
Sea at 33,000 ft. en route to Camp Bastion, Helmand
Province.
The captain was alone on the flight deck as the co-pilot
took a break. During this time, the captain took 28 photos
of the flight deck using his personal digital SLR camera
before placing the camera between the captain’s seat
armrest and the left-hand side-stick controller.
One minute before the incident, the captain began
moving his seat forward, creating a slight physical jam
between the armrest and the side-stick.
“At the onset of the event, the captain’s seat was moved
forward again, forcing the side-stick fully forward and initiating
the pitch-down command,” the report says.
The stick command disconnected the autopilot and sent
the aircraft into a steep dive with the A330 losing 4,400
ft. in 27 sec.
With no co-pilot in the right-hand seat, the command
could not be countermanded until he returned, having
scaled across the cockpit ceiling in negative g in order to
return to his seat.
The aircraft’s onboard self-protection systems overrode
the stick input, with pitch-down protection activated
3 sec. after the pitch-down command was given, while
high-speed protection was triggered 13 sec. after the
event started as the aircraft passed through 330 kt. With
the flight control system idling the engines, it recovered
the dive to level flight.
According to the report, the camera became free from
the side-stick and armrest after 33 sec.
Passengers and crew in the main cabin were thrown to
the ceiling, with 24 passengers sustaining injuries during
the dive, along with all seven of the cabin crew. Most of
the injuries occurred as the individuals came into contact
with the ceiling and overhead fittings or were struck by
loose objects.
The crew then diverted the aircraft to Incirlik air base
in Turkey, where it made a safe landing.
While the incident caused damage to a number of
fixtures and fittings inside the cabin, there was no
damage to the cockpit and no structural damage to the
aircraft.
U.K. defense ministry officials formally halted operations
with the military-specification Voyager following the
incident. The report adds that the captain’s oral report
“alluded only to a possible fault with the autopilot.” The
ministry lifted the grounding after 12 days on Feb. 21.
“I classify this incident as a near-miss for very good
reason,” said Air Marshal Richard Garwood, director general
of the MAA, in the report’s conclusion.
“Frankly, without the excellent technology of the Airbus
A330 flight control laws, the outcome could have been
very different,” he said. “The culture and behaviors with
regard to taking nonessential loose articles onto the flight
deck is a major concern and needs to change.”
The report says that the siting of the camera between
the side-stick and the captain’s seat armrest was the direct
cause of the incident. But it also said there were
several contributory issues, including what the report
describes as “normalized behavior” regarding the carriage
and treatment of loose articles, as well as the use
of the camera in the cockpit. It also questions the extended
presence of a single person in the cockpit, and
that low workload and boredom may have been a contributory
factor as the A330’s cockpit is highly automated,
which led the captain to take photographs to keep
himself occupied.
The report says this is the first incident of its type ever
to be reported to Airbus in 190 million flight hours.
“On this occasion, the A330 automatic self-protection
systems likely prevented a disaster of significant scale,”
Garwood adds. “The loss of the aircraft was not an unrealistic
possibility.”
“The RAF is in the process of implementing the recommendations
made by the Service Inquiry, including
instructions to ensure no objects are placed between pilots’
armrests and the side-stick,” an RAF spokesman told
Aviation Daily.
The same spokesman would not confirm the current
status of the pilot. “RAF investigations and consideration
of the matter are ongoing. Therefore, we are unable to offer
additional comment at this time,” he said.
– Tony Osborne, [email protected]
All opinions expressed by me are my own opinions & do not represent the opinions in any way of my employers.
 
vikkyvik
Posts: 12528
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:58 pm

RE: Article - Captain's Personal Camera Near Crash

Tue Mar 24, 2015 2:52 pm

Link:

http://aviationweek.com/defense/posi...l-camera-caused-near-crash-uk-a330

Crazy. Hopefully no one was seriously injured.
I'm watching Jeopardy. The category is worst Madonna songs. "This one from 1987 is terrible".
 
User avatar
kulverstukas
Posts: 1101
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 11:58 am

RE: Article - Captain's Personal Camera Near Crash

Tue Mar 24, 2015 3:43 pm

Scary. Twice so thinking about what happens today  
 
angad84
Posts: 2044
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 3:04 pm

RE: Article - Captain's Personal Camera Near Crash

Tue Mar 24, 2015 8:31 pm

Didn't we already know about this shortly after the incident?

EDIT: Yep, although back then it was just an "interim report," while this is a definitive version.

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/293230/interim_si_voyager_report.pdf

Cheers
Angad

[Edited 2015-03-24 13:33:51]
 
burchfiel
Posts: 479
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 10:34 am

RE: Article - Captain's Personal Camera Near Crash

Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:33 am

From the topic title, it sounds like there was a plane crash, and the captain's camera was found near it -- suggesting the camera was involved in an actual crash.
 
CaptainKramer
Posts: 281
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2012 8:12 pm

RE: Article - Captain's Personal Camera Near Crash

Sun Mar 29, 2015 12:31 am

Haven't read the Incident Report, but why didn't the Captain just dis-engage the Autopilot, and arrest the descent, no need to wait for the Co-Pilots return. The real issue here is, should DSLR Camera's and Lens which are quiet heavy to begin with, be allowed on the Flight Deck? If not secured on the Flight Deck they could become heavier projectiles during turbulence, under certain high/low G situations causing injury, let alone being a distraction to the job at hand, or causing an upset in the above example. (Cups of Coffee or Tea with no lids to stop contents spilling onto Flight Instruments being another). Camera's on Flight Decks are a recent phenomena, both Still and Video, thanks mainly to advances in Automation of Aircraft, i.e. Pilots are less Pro-Active now, except take-off and landing, more systems monitoring etc. There has also been a lot of debate about installing Cameras on the Flight Deck to record and monitor the activities of the Flight Crew for various reasons, presently resisted by Pilots Union, but with recent events involving possible Rogue Pilots on Commercial Flights, I'm sure the implementation and universal support of Government Legislation will soon over ride that resistance, most likely including the banning of Personnel Camera's and Laptops, Company Laptops being the exception. But I can still understand why they want to take pictures. The reassurance that the Aircraft Automation will alert Pilots of most issues, (without negating radio calls, instrument scans and systems monitoring!) fantastic cloudscapes and panoramic views constantly changing, taking photo's help keep intelligent minds occupied over long sectors, some up to 17 hours. The question now, is the writing on the wall?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos