User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 360
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:52 am

airkas1 wrote:
They look OK for me Stefan.

@ PABlokhin, please start your own feedback thread if you wish to ask for feedback.

Thanks for the feedback, I have tried an appeal then. Greets
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 360
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Wed Apr 25, 2018 8:16 am

Great, both were accepted. Thanks
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 360
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:45 am

Rejected for noise, quality, soft and vignetting. The vignetting is very hard rejection if you ask me, barely visible, and it`s not even vignetting but just slightly darker clouds (checked the original, there`s no vignetting at all). Is the sky noisy or the plane itself? And quality? Bit sursprised as the original is very good quality. Love to hear from you, greetings
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... d3c402cd4a
 
User avatar
airkas1
Head Screener
Posts: 6821
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Sat Apr 28, 2018 1:44 pm

It's passable for me.
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 360
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Sat Apr 28, 2018 1:50 pm

Okay Kas, I tried an appeal in this case
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 360
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Mon Apr 30, 2018 9:10 am

Great, accepted after appeal. Thanks
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 360
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Sat May 12, 2018 8:15 am

I have had a lot of rejections lately of photos I just can`t get right and would like your opinions about it. If a photo looks unfixable I would like to hear:

1. Rejected for Blurry-Compression-Dark-Soft-Low Contrast-Underexposed
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 67bb43b0c3

2. Rejected for Blurry-Colour-Compression-Quality-Soft-Noise-Underexposed
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 6ce739d673

3. Rejected for Dark-Soft-Low Contrast
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 09c0298ad8

4. Rejected for Noise-Underexposed
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 75945cceeb

5. Rejected for Dark-Oversharpened-Underexposed
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 7b5e34e91d

6. Rejected for Oversharpened-Noise-Underexposed
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 7aad854c47

Thanks!
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Screener In Training
Posts: 909
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Sat May 12, 2018 8:40 am

Airport Overview : I'll let it go since the light condition is very poor and the quality of the whole picture looks poor too. Would be hard to make it i think.
D-AAAY : Sharpness of it looks ok to me. Do not see compression issue from it and the noise looks not bad i think. But the exposure and colour do have problem. Colour is too purple and reddish i think. And it could be brighter.
N669UA : Could be brighter and the also can has bit of morecontrast.Agree with soft.
D-AIHA : Agree with Underexposed but noise looks not bad to me.
PH-BFT : It does look bit of underexposed and dark but the sharpness is not OS to me but bit of soft to me.
KLM 777 : Looks underexposed. Noise looks ok to me. Do not see obvious OS from it .

Cheers,
Harry
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : https://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 360
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Sun May 13, 2018 9:31 am

Thanks Harry, will try to see what I can fix.
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 360
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Fri May 25, 2018 5:14 pm

Hello, this nose shot was rejected for motive (stairs). I agree they block the side but I was not trying to show that side. Being this more a shot from the front where the nose it more the subject can this motive rejection being discussed of no chance?

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 21c392ed98
 
User avatar
airkas1
Head Screener
Posts: 6821
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Fri May 25, 2018 8:52 pm

Unfortunately I agree with motive.
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 360
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Fri May 25, 2018 10:46 pm

Okay, I understand, not a problem. Thanks for responding.
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 360
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Sat Jun 02, 2018 8:38 am

Hi, this one was rejected for blurry, noise, quality and overexposed.

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 28c9b2a028

I had a second look at the original photo and discovered some softness but not at all it`s blurry. So I don`t understand the blurry. Also overexposed it is not really right? Maybe some tiny parts at the engine for example but I don`t think that`s a problem. Noise is not more than usual. Which rejection reasons will stand you think and I have to work on? Thanks
 
dutchspotter1
Posts: 166
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 9:24 pm

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Sat Jun 02, 2018 1:34 pm

Top of fuselage and top of engine look overexposed. Noise seems acceptable. Sharpness is not too bad, but I would add some sharpness on the right engine and "Boeing 787-8" titles.
I would say the main problem is quality, because heathaze is visible (mainly top of the fuselage, leading edge right wing and also the left wing).
NO URLS in signature
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 360
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Sat Jun 02, 2018 7:55 pm

dutchspotter1 wrote:
Top of fuselage and top of engine look overexposed. Noise seems acceptable. Sharpness is not too bad, but I would add some sharpness on the right engine and "Boeing 787-8" titles.
I would say the main problem is quality, because heathaze is visible (mainly top of the fuselage, leading edge right wing and also the left wing).

Hi, thanks. I agree on the heathaze. I saw some in the original so I decided to edit in a smaller size. I still don`t really see the overexposure but to be sure I added a bit less brightness. Let`s see what happens. Greets
 
JKPhotos
Posts: 899
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 4:03 pm

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Sun Jun 03, 2018 11:14 am

Hey Stefan,

the harsh light doesn't help. You either have an overexposed top or a dark fuselage. I would generally recommend to shoot there in times with lower sun (= winter only).
Otherwise the sky is quite blotchy / grainy. Sharpness seems allright to me.

I guess due to the first reasons it will be difficult to get in, so I wouldn't spend too much time on it.

Julien

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos