Hi
Had this image originally rejected for CW rotation. On appeal this had changed to compression, what do you think.?
http://cdn-www.airliners.net/photos/air ... a4d3c03c35
Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
-
- kulverstukas
- Posts: 1101
- Joined:
Re: Rejected for CW rotation/compression
Leveling issue for skyshot? o.O
Sky abowe a/c look a bit blotchy through. So may be this is what they now calls "compression" (I believe it was "banding" at old A.net). They seems also changed "grainy" to "noise".
Sky abowe a/c look a bit blotchy through. So may be this is what they now calls "compression" (I believe it was "banding" at old A.net). They seems also changed "grainy" to "noise".
Re: Rejected for CW rotation/compression
Sometimes the cloudbase can be used to ascertain level, although this is tricky as cloud science is far from exact, and their bases aren't always indicative. Judging by that particular cloudbase, the shot would appear, at first glance, to look unlevel, however there are two clouds that could suggest the levelling is accurate. Angles can be deceptive - benefit of doubt therefore should have been given here, rather than the screener trying too hard to delve into the behaviour of clouds.
Re: Rejected for CW rotation/compression
I think it looks great. Crisp and clear against a blue sky with clouds for contrast Nice job
Re: Rejected for CW rotation/compression
It does look a bit odd, the tail and last few meters of the wing especially. Sort of blurry/heathaze-ish feeling.
Re: Rejected for CW rotation/compression
.0.0. the color is too green for me ...and also a little soft...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests