Page 1 of 1

Rejected for CW rotation/compression

Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2016 10:44 am
by bombayduck
Hi
Had this image originally rejected for CW rotation. On appeal this had changed to compression, what do you think.?


http://cdn-www.airliners.net/photos/air ... a4d3c03c35

Re: Rejected for CW rotation/compression

Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2016 2:50 pm
by kulverstukas
Leveling issue for skyshot? o.O

Sky abowe a/c look a bit blotchy through. So may be this is what they now calls "compression" (I believe it was "banding" at old A.net). They seems also changed "grainy" to "noise".

Re: Rejected for CW rotation/compression

Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2016 4:19 pm
by JakTrax
Sometimes the cloudbase can be used to ascertain level, although this is tricky as cloud science is far from exact, and their bases aren't always indicative. Judging by that particular cloudbase, the shot would appear, at first glance, to look unlevel, however there are two clouds that could suggest the levelling is accurate. Angles can be deceptive - benefit of doubt therefore should have been given here, rather than the screener trying too hard to delve into the behaviour of clouds.

Re: Rejected for CW rotation/compression

Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2016 6:39 pm
by steveinbc
I think it looks great. Crisp and clear against a blue sky with clouds for contrast Nice job

Re: Rejected for CW rotation/compression

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 8:25 pm
by airkas1
It does look a bit odd, the tail and last few meters of the wing especially. Sort of blurry/heathaze-ish feeling.

Re: Rejected for CW rotation/compression

Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2016 4:01 pm
by HarryLi
.0.0. the color is too green for me ...and also a little soft...