Airliners.net

Hi Im a complete rookie in case of night photos and interior photos. Could someone who had experience give me opinion about this photos and should I upload them ? Thanks.
An 2
https://flic.kr/p/N3jhFShttps://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/

MiG 29
https://flic.kr/p/N3jhqwhttps://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/

DHC-1 Chipmunk
https://flic.kr/p/N3jhamhttps://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/

EC135
https://flic.kr/p/NdxTGahttps://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/
https://flic.kr/p/N3jgQJhttps://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/

Robinson R22
https://flic.kr/p/N3jepmhttps://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/

2 more waiting for opinion:
IMG_2234m5M https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/
IMG_2266m5Mhttps://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/

AN2: Could use a bit more brightness (except the plane, otherwise it will be overexposed).
MiG29: Looks slightly high in frame, but otherwise passable.
DHC1: Fuselage & wing look a litte blurry/out of focus. Needs ssome more brightness (same as the AN2).
EC35: Needs more brightness, smaller size would be better.
EC35: Blurry/out of focus.
R22: Looks passable (new to the DB).

DHL: Looks passable, but quite a tight crop on the left side.
ICE: Needs to be brighter.

MiG 29 accepted: https://www.airliners.net/photo/Poland-A ... 29/4033143
Thanks for your help Kas

Few more waiting for opinion:

A340
IMG_4166Maksym1 https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/
A319
IMG_4010Maksym1 https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/
A319
IMG_3899Maksym1 https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/
A310
IMG_3922Maksym1 https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/
A330
IMG_3870Maksym1 https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/
Gulfstream V
IMG_3843Maksym1 https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/
A319
IMG_3494Maksym1 https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/

LotmaniaK wrote:

MiG 29 accepted: https://www.airliners.net/photo/Poland-A ... 29/4033143
Thanks for your help Kas

Excellent!


A340 (German): Oversharpened, CCW, marginal quality.
A319 (Azerbaijan): Oversharpened.
A319 (Slovak): Distance, quality.
A310 (Spain): Oversharpened-ish, CCW, marginal quality.
A330 (Turkish): Cheatlines oversharpened.
GLF4 (USA): Distance, blurry, quality.
A319 (Czech): Blurry, low contrast-ish, quality.

Please give me opinion on this Air China 747
IMG_0480Maksym25 https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/

The aft section is a bit blurry and needs some CW. Also a common frame I think.

TS-11 Iskra
IMG_6684Maksym1 https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/
Mi-2
IMG_6601Maksym1 https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/

One more waiting for opinion:
AFO
IMG_4273Maksym545454545M45 https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/

Two more:
787
IMG_7281Maksym1 https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/

F100
IMG_6423Maksym1 https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/

One more:
F100
IMG_7916Maksym1 https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/

Hello, the last one I would say looks a bit out of focus/soft or even blurry. The three above look a bit soft and grainy. I would say not good enough to upload without a bit more editing. There is also a very tight crop for the LOT and the USAF has a bit loose crop

Iskra: Passable-ish.
Mi-2: I would personally try to put more green in it, to counter the magenta color. Softish due to blurryish, quality looks 50-50.
AF1: Noisy, oversharpened, distance.
B787: Looks ok, although the crop on the right side is very tight.
F100: Blurry, quality.
Cabin: Blurry, quality.

Thanks Kas and spompert. One more:
Dassault Falcon 50EX
IMG_2762Maksym1 https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/

LotmaniaK wrote:

Thanks Kas and spompert. One more:
Dassault Falcon 50EX

Very low in frame, also looks soft/blurry but my judgement of that shouldn't be trusted...

Thanks Kaphias. What about this photo ? Would it be rejected for motive ?
A330
IMG_5679Maksym1 https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/

Hello, today I got this two photos rejected for:
Oversharpened
http://cdn-www.airliners.net/photos/air ... 94e851135a
Noise
http://cdn-www.airliners.net/photos/air ... 90d3a852e6
Please tell me If I can improve quality of these photos and give them a second chance, thanks.

About the engine shot, try to include the whole landing gear on the right and crop a little more on the left side to avoid the foreground distractions. Looks dark also. Cant comment about sharpness.

TNT shot I can see some grainy on the sky and I would remove the airplane in the background, in some cases you can get a dirty rejection.

Regards

Another five photos rejected :
Soft
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... f24d817b51
Low contrast & Overexposed
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 01c0ce639b
Low contrast & Overexposed
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... afa6e22a37
Soft
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 34f90bf723
Oversharpened & Soft
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 3708967eb3

Any opinions about this photos ? How can I improve them ?

ANA Dreamliner: definitely low contrast. Adjusting the contrast may fix that exposure.
Eurowings 320: Same as ANA
LH 321: Maybe appearing soft due to the sun glare line. Not really sure with my display I am on.

Thanks len90, any opinions about Siberia and British ?

S7: Blurry/soft, quite bright and quality is marginal.
ANA: Low contrast & soft. Disagree on overexposed.
Germanwings: Blurry/soft, low contrast. More contrast might fix the exposure.
LH A321: Blurryish/softish, marginal quality.
BA: Titles look oversharpened.

Any opinions about this engine pick ?

Quality isn't that good, feels left in frame and not that appealing to me personally.

Yeah i agree with Kas .. The quality of the whole picture seems not pretty good. Besides, i think the Left side Space is smaller than the right.

Definitely agree on the composition right now with the centering. Wonder if the quality is just more of a victim of the lighting conditions at the time of the picture.

Thank you all for feedback. What about this photo ?

To me it does not look balanced with a lot of space on the left side. Would be better if you include the whole engine and/or wing.

Thanks spompert. What about this wing view ?

Hi, I would say the wing is a bit dark and the furthest background is very low in contrast. You might improve by choosing more 2:3 or 3:4 ratio so you can clip some air. Doing this you might be able to improve the contrast of the landscape and brighten the wing a bit more without overexposing other parts of the photo. Better to resize to 1200px. Greets

Wingview 1) Yellow, noisy, small window reflection underneath the engine
Wingview 2) Noisy, better in 3:4 crop to eliminate 'dead' sky. Contrast is ok for me

Second version

Got this photo rejected today, any thoughts ?

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 16b1f98eaa

Definitely looks blurry, sorry.

Thanks Kas, and what about second version of Nordica CRJ wing view photo ? Is it better than the first one ?

Better than the first one yes. In a smaller size than you linked, I think it could be passable. For portrait photos, I usually do 1024px on the long size (1200 if quality is exceptional).

Two more photos :

Both are oversharpened and not great quality. Doubtful they will get accepted, sorry.

2 more rejected :
- Overexposed
- Oversharpened
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... f994f0aca2
- Soft
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 3743a092a5
Are they fixable or not ?

LotmaniaK wrote:

2 more rejected :
- Overexposed
- Oversharpened
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... f994f0aca2
- Soft
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 3743a092a5
Are they fixable or not ?

Both of them i think can be fixable.

2 more photos :

One more :

EK: should be fixable
ANA: looks a bit blurry. Don't think it's fixable by adding more sharpening.
El Al: blurry, oversharpened, quality.
SAS: oversharpened, quality.
El Al: blurry, oversharpened, quality.

Wing view accepted , thanks for advice.

https://www.airliners.net/photo/Nordica/ ... 24/4327781

Next photos for judgement :

The first one seems grainy.
The second one and the final one i guess a little bit OS.
A321 is better than others but still OS i think.

Thanks Harry. 6 more photos ...

The first one i think is ok.
The second one looks a little fine.
The third one is ok for me.
Forth: Ok for me.
KLM : Ok for me.
The final one, i think a little bit OS i think. Especially the wing has a little jaggy i guess.
And i recommend that you use another compressing way.If you use PS when you change the size , the ps will auto choose Auto Mode, but i usually choose another one i don't know what is the name in your version because i use Chinese Version i remember it should be the second one in the list.I think that way can improve Picture Quality.
Cheers,
Harry

Thanks for the tip Harry. 4 more .....

PC12: marginal quality, doubt it will get in.
The AC's are a bit marginal, could go either way. They seem to be a sort of mix of slight noise/blurry/oversharpened.

BA: oversharpened
LO: oversharpened
W6: oversharpened
LO: marginal
KL: marginal
Nordica: sharpish at the titles, somewhat marginal

AF: passable
LO: bit oversharpened
EK: oversharpened
W6: not great, but maybe passable