User avatar
airkas1
Head Screener
Posts: 7019
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Wed Apr 25, 2018 4:21 pm

The 2 photos for vignetting and noise look fine to me.

Cathay looks a bit soft on the fuselage, but doesn't need much sharpening
Cathay Dragon looks a little blurry on the front section.
Dragonair looks blurry/hazed
 
User avatar
airkas1
Head Screener
Posts: 7019
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Thu Apr 26, 2018 11:43 am

I did see some vignetting on the left side after all. I accepted them on appeal to not hurt your ratio, but could you please give them a re-edit and reupload? The reupload feature is in your photo corner, on the right side of the photo in the 'accepted' tab.
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:34 pm

 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Sat Apr 28, 2018 6:33 pm

 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Sun Apr 29, 2018 2:03 pm

Another rejection :

Blurry, Oversharpened, Noise

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... dd9f07715d
 
User avatar
airkas1
Head Screener
Posts: 7019
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Mon Apr 30, 2018 1:11 pm

Cathay looks passable
El Al looks a bit blurred/not great quality
TAP is marginal, 50/50
LOT I can agree to those reason. Marginal quality and a noisyish sky
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Mon Apr 30, 2018 3:31 pm

 
User avatar
HarryLi
Screener
Posts: 933
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Tue May 01, 2018 12:25 am

Ural : Looks marginal to me. Soft and little bit low contrast i think.
CA 77W : Blurry to me especially the front part and the titles.
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : https://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Tue May 01, 2018 5:23 am

Thanks for feedback Harry, maybe this CA photo is better ?

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 605a86275b
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Screener
Posts: 933
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Tue May 01, 2018 2:38 pm

I am sorry that it still looks pretty blurry to me. Titles windows .
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : https://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Tue May 01, 2018 6:35 pm

 
 
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Fri May 04, 2018 2:09 pm

 
User avatar
HarryLi
Screener
Posts: 933
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Sun May 06, 2018 10:57 am

Hi,here are my own opinions :
Ural : Blurry to me. [Especially the front part and the tail.]
LOT E175 : Soft and Blurry to me.Especially nose.
Wizz : Front part looks blurry and soft.[Cockpit glasses are obvious.]
LOT 738MAX : Soft & slight Blurry.
Nordica : Blurry toward the Front part and titles.
LOT 787 :Looks better but still looks slight blurry to me and it looks slightly low in frame too.
LOT E175 : Pretty Blurry toward the front part.
C-295 : Front part [Nose] looks pretty soft which leads to Blurry i think.
LH A320 : Soft but might be blurry i think.
TK A321 : Soft and slight blurry i think.
Belavia B735 : Windows look pretty soft and slight low in Frame to me.

DHL B757F : Whole aircraft looks blurry and bit of underexposed to me although you might shoot it in sunset or before sunrise. Slightly low in frame to my favor. I will tend to adjust the colour too since it's bit of reddish to me.
TF-BBH : Front part looks pretty blurry and it's obvious blurry.
UPS MD11F : Underexposed to me.

UPS MD11F (288UP) : Pretty blurry and underexposed.

Cheers,
Harry
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : https://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Sun May 06, 2018 11:10 am

Thanks for your opinion Harry. What about this photo ?

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 994616cedf
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Screener
Posts: 933
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Sun May 06, 2018 11:28 am

LotmaniaK wrote:
Thanks for your opinion Harry. What about this photo ?

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 994616cedf

I am sorry. I afraid that this one will not make it in A.net since it's pretty blurry toward the front part especially the nose. As you can see those letters An-26B is not clear at all and cockpit looks blurry too.
From those photos you posted, most of them are blurry to the right side especially the nose and the tail. Did you check your lens settings or your camera settings ? Or maybe is your lens problem ? If so you can change another lens to have a try and see the results. And maybe is your Filter problem [UV],you can try to remove it and spot to see if it will be better. I got the same problem before when i use my old lense.
Cheers,
Harry
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : https://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
Runway28L
Posts: 1148
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2017 7:35 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Sun May 06, 2018 5:06 pm

For the record, it seems like whenever I use an auto-zoom, or AF-S lens since I have a Nikon, the front part of the aircraft hardly ever focuses despite me being pretty steady and it's why I rarely even use my 55-200mm in auto.

My 70-300mm is just AF only, no autofocus feature. And it's pretty good at getting every part of the aircraft on-point.

Maybe if you are using a lens with autofocus enabled and aren't getting the entire aircraft crisp, perhaps consider trying out manual?
Greetings from KPIT! Check out my photos here: https://www.airliners.net/search?user=45 ... teAccepted
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Tue May 08, 2018 11:17 am

I will try out manual next time. One more photo :

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... c537294571
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Screener
Posts: 933
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Tue May 08, 2018 12:20 pm

UPS MD11F looks underexposed and soft , blurry, poor quality i think. Title, front gear, cockpit pretty blurry and the tail is soft.
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : https://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
airkas1
Head Screener
Posts: 7019
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Wed May 09, 2018 7:36 pm

Underexposed, overexposed (highlights of fuselage blown) and will not make it.
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Wed May 09, 2018 8:04 pm

 
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Thu May 10, 2018 9:39 pm

 
len90
Posts: 1127
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 1:03 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Fri May 11, 2018 2:00 am

UPS MD11: need to take down those shadows a bit to help with that harsh contrast
Qatar 330: Not nearly as severe as the MD, but contrast is a bit harsh
Blank 737F: Harsh Contrast
TNT: May be a bit OS on the black of the livery
DHL: I'm good with it, some may not like the color but seems to be a low sun angle
Len90
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Fri May 11, 2018 2:09 pm

Thanks for feedback Len. This photo got rejected for high in frame :

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 10f0f94ff0
 
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Screener
Posts: 933
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Sat May 12, 2018 3:22 am

Blue Bird Cargo : HIF looks not bad to me although i would tend to move it little bit downward. Besides, it looks soft and underexposed to me.
UPS : Looks better but the cockpit and nose look soft/blurry to me .
QR A330 : Looks not bad to me. But i would like to promote bit of exposure since it looks slightly underexposed. Besides,i think smaller size might be better like 1024px.
EI-STM : Front part (Cockpit, nose, gear) look blurry to me.

Cheers,
Harry
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : https://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Sat May 12, 2018 9:13 am

Thank you for your opinions Harry. One more photo:

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 28ea9ef75c
 
User avatar
airkas1
Head Screener
Posts: 7019
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Sat May 12, 2018 9:31 am

The El Al seems blurry, sorry.
 
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Sun May 13, 2018 5:20 am

DHL got rejected for Soft & Underexposed :

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 971f8e3cf8
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Sun May 13, 2018 2:08 pm

 
User avatar
airkas1
Head Screener
Posts: 7019
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Sun May 13, 2018 8:54 pm

The DHL can still be brighter.
 
 
User avatar
airkas1
Head Screener
Posts: 7019
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Tue May 15, 2018 3:38 pm

They're all marginal and somewhat underexposed due to the poor angle of light.
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Thu May 17, 2018 3:01 pm

This picture was rejected on appeal for High in frame :

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 10f0f94ff0

Now the edited version was rejected for Blurry :

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... e4bcd771e9
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Screener
Posts: 933
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Fri May 18, 2018 11:17 am

Title looks blurry to me as well.
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : https://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Sun May 27, 2018 8:46 am

 
User avatar
airkas1
Head Screener
Posts: 7019
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Sun May 27, 2018 9:42 am

Blurry, OS, poor quality. Sorry.
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Mon May 28, 2018 8:57 pm

 
User avatar
HarryLi
Screener
Posts: 933
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Tue May 29, 2018 12:06 pm

I am sorry that it looks quiet Underexposed and Poor quality. Especially the sky looks slightly Grainy/Noise.

Cheers,
Harry
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : https://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
airkas1
Head Screener
Posts: 7019
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Tue May 29, 2018 1:06 pm

I tend to agree with Harry's comments.
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Sun Jun 10, 2018 7:47 am

I need some feedback on this 767 pic :

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 3ef8932f2b
 
User avatar
airkas1
Head Screener
Posts: 7019
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Sun Jun 10, 2018 9:06 am

Looks passable.
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Sun Jun 10, 2018 10:39 am

Thanks Kas. What about this Sukhoi pic ?

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 75dbc30cd6
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Screener
Posts: 933
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Sun Jun 10, 2018 1:40 pm

LotmaniaK wrote:
Thanks Kas. What about this Sukhoi pic ?

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 75dbc30cd6

I am sorry that the Sukhoi looks pretty blurry and soft to me. :cry:

Cheers,
Harry
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : https://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Sun Jun 10, 2018 7:17 pm

Thanks for feedback Harry. What about this 787 photo ?

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 9858ff4d59

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos