Page 4 of 5

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2018 7:02 am
by LotmaniaK

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2018 8:12 pm
by LotmaniaK

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2018 8:32 am
by LotmaniaK

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2018 11:35 am
by dutchspotter1
Congo: front and back part look fine but the middle part (e.g. engines, left gear) does seem a bit soft/blurry.
Austrian: back part looks fine but front part does seem a bit blurry (perhaps heathaze)

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2018 3:05 pm
by LotmaniaK
Thanks dutchspotter1, another recent rejection :

Soft
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 3ef8932f2b

Should I appeal this photo ?

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2018 9:52 pm
by LotmaniaK

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2018 10:28 pm
by jelpee
Looks over-sharpened and very contrasty to me.

Jehan

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 9:49 am
by LotmaniaK

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 2:21 pm
by airkas1
The A320 and B767 look passable.

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:44 pm
by jelpee
The B767 could use some sharpening IMO. A320 looks acceptable.

Jehan

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:23 pm
by LotmaniaK

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 8:29 am
by HarryLi
B737 looks blurry not sure... maybe is too soft. Besides, i also conside that it could have bit of more contrast.
Regarding to the Q400, Quality looks iffy to me. It looks slight blurry to me.

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2018 9:34 pm
by LotmaniaK

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2018 2:02 pm
by jelpee
The minor titles in the LOT B737 look soft. Some selective sharpening of those and it would be acceptable for me.
The Swiss A319 looks fine for me.

Jehan

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2018 11:03 am
by airkas1
Blue Air soft front fuselage, Q400 looks passable. The LOT B737 and Swiss A319 look fine to me.

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2018 1:40 pm
by LotmaniaK

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2018 2:40 pm
by airkas1
The CRJ looks a little blurry at the nose, but the rest look fine.

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2018 5:46 pm
by LotmaniaK
Thank you Kas, both Bulgarian and El Al were rejected for Soft, should I appeal or reedit them ?

Bulgarian
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... e97f97e86f

El Al
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 4e120dace7

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2018 12:51 pm
by LotmaniaK

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2018 6:43 pm
by dutchspotter1
I'd say the Blue Air B735 is slightly overexposed, other than that a great set

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2018 8:25 pm
by LotmaniaK
Thank you dutchspotter1, I need an opinion on this two evening cargos :

AN-26
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 01d836c9e3

B757
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 943f423c21

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2018 8:28 am
by dutchspotter1
An-26 looks somewhat blurry (wings, tail, engines).
UPS might be a little oversharped (tltles, reg) and is cropped very tight (probably not a dealbreaker, but personally I prefer more space on the sides)

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2018 8:16 pm
by LotmaniaK
Thank you once again. This 767 was rejected for Soft & Overexposed. Is the new reedited one better ?

Previous
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 4e120dace7

New
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 215eba1267

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2018 8:24 pm
by dutchspotter1
Yes :)

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2018 9:37 pm
by airkas1
I actually prefer the old version, but the new one should be fine too.

AN-26: little blurry.
B757: OS titles and registration, needs a bit wider crop.

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2018 9:58 pm
by LotmaniaK
Unfortunetly I can not crop it any other way, could it be rejected for that ? Less sharpened version :

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... c8ecc5f661

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 4:51 am
by Runway28L
The crop near the nose is really close but I think it could still warrant being ok IMO. The issue is the crop by the horizontal stabilizer. You can see that it barely contacts the right side of the frame. You could try, but I wouldn't hold my breath.

If the framing isn't very manageable like you mentioned perhaps you could pick a different image of that aircraft if you have one?

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 3:21 pm
by HarryLi
UPS 757F is too low in frame i think.

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2018 1:59 pm
by LotmaniaK
Two recent rejections, I will be grateful for comment :

Blurry
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... caf800f055

Blurry & Overexposed
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... ec97f71624

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2018 11:14 am
by LotmaniaK

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2018 7:23 pm
by dutchspotter1
LOT B787 and Bluebird B734F seem oversharped, Air China A332 low in frame.

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2018 3:37 pm
by LotmaniaK
Reedited Air China and Bluebird. MD-11 UPS and LOT 737 are alright ?

A332
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 3010cfe5f6

B734F
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 71cbc2bf5b

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2018 8:34 pm
by LotmaniaK

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2018 5:55 pm
by LotmaniaK

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2018 5:38 pm
by LotmaniaK

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2018 5:47 pm
by jelpee
LotmaniaK wrote:


Both these look blurry to me.

Jehan

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2018 5:48 pm
by jelpee
LotmaniaK wrote:


In all 3, the nose area looks blurry to me.
In SP-KCS, the entire aircraft looks blurry.

Jehan

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:45 am
by LotmaniaK
I will appreciate some feedback on this photo :

MD-11
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 3bdaf7b4e4

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2018 10:59 am
by airkas1
Looks OK.

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2018 7:36 pm
by LotmaniaK
Thanks Kas. I need some feedback on this two photos :

B787
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... c4199e63ab

B777
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 861d2a985f

One question regardless priority screening, Does the photo of the aircraft diverted due to medical reason qualifie for priority screening ?

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2018 8:54 am
by airkas1
B787: looks a bit blurryish towards the front.
B777: looks passable

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2018 7:35 pm
by LotmaniaK
I'm looking for some feedback on this cockpit photo :

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 15c64d4ccb

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2018 3:30 am
by HarryLi
Sorry, the cockpit shot looks blurry and soft to me. Overexposed outside the windows doesn't work for me but probably work for some others. Quality of whole image is poor.

Cheers,
Harry

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2018 5:59 am
by LotmaniaK
Thanks Harry. Maybe this window view photo will work :

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... e2927a271a

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2018 6:47 am
by HarryLi
I'm not sure about the crop of it, but the quality of the whole image seems to be poor. Bit of low contrast to me. What's the white spot beside the winglet ?

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2018 9:47 am
by airkas1
Marginal quality/blurry at the bottom of the engine and there is a white stain right behind the wingtip.

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2018 7:27 pm
by LotmaniaK

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2018 7:44 pm
by fsx98
I'm not much of a screener, but I think it is a little underexposed.

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2018 9:37 pm
by LotmaniaK
Another version with increased exposure :

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 88551d3e0f

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2018 9:58 pm
by fsx98
Looks quite better, IMO!