So I would like some opinions on some of these pictures. Also not sure if imgur is the best way to post them but here they are anyways.
https://imgur.com/a/DF4iikh
Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Re: Prescreening and editing pointers.
Hi,
MU B738: Needs a tighter crop
AC E190: A bit underexposed, noisy, and soft/blurry
HA B763: Underexposed, too much contrast, and the rear of the fuselage and tail looks soft/blurry
FX MD11: Blochy sky and nose looks blurry. Also needs a tighter crop.
DE B763: Obvious haloing by the winglet
FX MD10: Underexposed
I'd wait for a second opinion as I may be wrong or missing other issues on some of them.
MU B738: Needs a tighter crop
AC E190: A bit underexposed, noisy, and soft/blurry
HA B763: Underexposed, too much contrast, and the rear of the fuselage and tail looks soft/blurry
FX MD11: Blochy sky and nose looks blurry. Also needs a tighter crop.
DE B763: Obvious haloing by the winglet
FX MD10: Underexposed
I'd wait for a second opinion as I may be wrong or missing other issues on some of them.
Re: Prescreening and editing pointers.
Ya some of them haven't been cropped or fully cropped yet. The HA 767 is a dusk shot so contrast will be slightly fun to fix.
Re: Prescreening and editing pointers.
Here is with the DE 767 with the halo fixed https://imgur.com/a/SRjSj7E
Re: Prescreening and editing pointers.
Here is another 4 I would like some pointers on.
https://imgur.com/a/NJLOxM0
https://imgur.com/a/NJLOxM0
Re: Prescreening and editing pointers.
They are all blurry. At least the first two are not fixable I am afraid. Do you see the blurriness yourself?
Re: Prescreening and editing pointers.
I do see blurriness on the tails of the 767 and 737 which from the angle I took it at i'm guessing. I don't see any blur on the MD10.. Where are you seeing that?
-
- Miguel1982
- Posts: 214
- Joined:
Re: Prescreening and editing pointers.
As Stefan pointed out, the UPS and Alaska are too blurry to work, even in smaller sizes. The DC-10 looks more soft than blurry to me. I would try another edit in a smaller size, increasing the contrast and removing some blue color cast.
Cheers,
Miguel
Cheers,
Miguel
Re: Prescreening and editing pointers.
https://imgur.com/a/M942YMB Added a little bit to the contrast and removed some of the tint on the md10.
https://imgur.com/a/YZuWiWs what do you think on this one? Oh and all are full res still and not saved as reduced size
https://imgur.com/a/YZuWiWs what do you think on this one? Oh and all are full res still and not saved as reduced size
Re: Prescreening and editing pointers.
WolfPDX wrote:https://imgur.com/a/M942YMB Added a little bit to the contrast and removed some of the tint on the md10.
https://imgur.com/a/YZuWiWs what do you think on this one? Oh and all are full res still and not saved as reduced size
Hi Wolf, sorry for my late reply. The DC-10 looks still a bit soft to me, especially towards the rear. But you might check with a screener because my eye for softness is not that good. The Hawaiian lacks quality I am afraid. You can see it overall but mostly around the wing. It might be called soft but I think it`s not fixable. It`s also underexposed or dark due to the lacking sunlight. In the middle it seems to have a reflection or something I can`t understand. Good luck
Re: Prescreening and editing pointers.
Enter hence why I'm here statement. But truthfully I can get faster and more detailed responses here than waiting in the queue for a week.
https://imgur.com/a/VrS6Aok About these two?
https://imgur.com/a/VrS6Aok About these two?
Re: Prescreening and editing pointers.
Hi, those photos you posted there seem to be the original size image. Showing images which have aleady finished all editing process here can get better response. Since you will upload those pics after resizing instead of original size. Showing aft resizing images here can get more precise feedback like sharpness. BTW, these two look unerexposed i think. Since you didn't provide resizing images, i couldn't give any opinions on sharpenss yet.
Cheers,
Harry
Cheers,
Harry
Re: Prescreening and editing pointers.
Alright how are these? Also started to save these at upload size.
https://imgur.com/a/InFaSJ2
https://imgur.com/a/InFaSJ2
Re: Prescreening and editing pointers.
So I would like some insight why this one was rejected being centered. 
But this one was accepted being honestly kinda low in frame.
But this one was accepted being honestly kinda low in frame.
Re: Prescreening and editing pointers.
Hello,
First of all, in order to see precise result i downloaded this image and have a quick check in my PS and here is the result:
According to the image, the center looks not bad to me actually. As you can see the upper space is almost the same as the under space. Although i think the under part is bit of bigger than the upper one, it still looks not bad to me.
However, i found another problem of this image i think you can fix it quickl.
Here is a visible dirty spot.
BTW, the saturation of this one looks bit of too high to me honestly since the colour looks pretty unnatural and the whole image looks bit of green/cyan to me. Reducing bit of it should be better i think (But just my persoanl opinions.). Especially after comparing to this one :
From colour respect, i prefer this one
Cheers,
Harry
First of all, in order to see precise result i downloaded this image and have a quick check in my PS and here is the result:
According to the image, the center looks not bad to me actually. As you can see the upper space is almost the same as the under space. Although i think the under part is bit of bigger than the upper one, it still looks not bad to me.
However, i found another problem of this image i think you can fix it quickl.
Here is a visible dirty spot.
BTW, the saturation of this one looks bit of too high to me honestly since the colour looks pretty unnatural and the whole image looks bit of green/cyan to me. Reducing bit of it should be better i think (But just my persoanl opinions.). Especially after comparing to this one :
From colour respect, i prefer this one
Cheers,
Harry
Re: Prescreening and editing pointers.
funny enough the dirt spots there was another one about 1/3 left above the clouds. were not noted or flag on any uploads of it but I did notice them afterwards.
How is this one? hybrid of the two in terms of color/position.
How is this one? hybrid of the two in terms of color/position.
Re: Prescreening and editing pointers.
The centering of the first photo is spot on and definitely not high in frame. The second photo is quite low in frame.
Re: Prescreening and editing pointers.
So basically I should have appealed the first one then.
Re: Prescreening and editing pointers.
WolfPDX wrote:So basically I should have appealed the first one then.
Well, you could have a try to it if it won't be rejected by "Dirty". Center is certainly on for me.
Re: Prescreening and editing pointers.
Not familiar with reuploading a picture. Would that be a ok idea with the accepted picture?
Re: Prescreening and editing pointers.
WolfPDX wrote:Not familiar with reuploading a picture. Would that be a ok idea with the accepted picture?
Oops
I didn't notice that those two pics are the same aircrafts. Yes, you can use "Re-upload" function to upload another version to replace the current one but "Re-upload" still need to be screened.Thus, it still needs time but it'll be faster than normal queue most of time. Cheers,
Harry
Re: Prescreening and editing pointers.
Alright gave the edited shot a try....
What do people think of this one? Thought it was a fun shot with the 752 leaving behind it.
What do people think of this one? Thought it was a fun shot with the 752 leaving behind it.
-
- Miguel1982
- Posts: 214
- Joined:
Re: Prescreening and editing pointers.
Even though there is no clear reference, my feeling is that it needs some CW rotation. Can you try that and see which one you like best? Otherwise looks very nice.
Re: Prescreening and editing pointers.
Ok so added a slight cw rotation to make level with the grass hill with the car on it. any better?
Oh and would like any thoughts on this one?
Oh and would like any thoughts on this one?
Re: Prescreening and editing pointers.
Could I get some feedback on these five?
https://ibb.co/cGDNuo
https://ibb.co/bLuj78
https://ibb.co/eBBWn8
https://ibb.co/gPz6LT
https://ibb.co/fXkP78
https://ibb.co/cGDNuo
https://ibb.co/bLuj78
https://ibb.co/eBBWn8
https://ibb.co/gPz6LT
https://ibb.co/fXkP78
Re: Prescreening and editing pointers.
Qatar and Cathay look nice.
Of N570UP, only one can be uploaded as they are all double. Personally I would go for "IMG 7711 2", but with better colors. It looks yellow/red as is and needs more blue. Otherwise looks nice.
The Delta looks a bit red as well and quite soft (also due to the glare). Windowline, titles and cockpit are especially soft.
FedEx: a bit high in frame and could use some more brightness and increased contrast.
Of N570UP, only one can be uploaded as they are all double. Personally I would go for "IMG 7711 2", but with better colors. It looks yellow/red as is and needs more blue. Otherwise looks nice.
The Delta looks a bit red as well and quite soft (also due to the glare). Windowline, titles and cockpit are especially soft.
FedEx: a bit high in frame and could use some more brightness and increased contrast.
Re: Prescreening and editing pointers.
Took a little break from edit normal flights but how do these look?
https://ibb.co/jMg0dd
https://ibb.co/cfqbZJ
https://ibb.co/jtr5Td
https://ibb.co/i9xquJ
https://ibb.co/kaSeod
https://ibb.co/c6fX8d
https://ibb.co/jMg0dd
https://ibb.co/cfqbZJ
https://ibb.co/jtr5Td
https://ibb.co/i9xquJ
https://ibb.co/kaSeod
https://ibb.co/c6fX8d
-
- dutchspotter1
- Posts: 532
- Joined:
Re: Prescreening and editing pointers.
Except for the first and last they seem blurry/soft.
Re: Prescreening and editing pointers.
Seconded, they all look blurry to me except first and last, last may be a bit soft in areas.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests