Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
dutchspotter1 wrote:N791AN: doesn't look dark/underexposed to me, but the titles are oversharped.
N426AA: doesn't look underexposed either, but the right part is blurry.
DL747 wrote:Front looks soft to me, tail borderline, and the titles are slightly oversharpened, but borderline. It is also fairly noisy, so I would suggest a pass of NR.
DL747 wrote:You could try downsizing, but imo I don't think that will mask the blur enough. The second probably has a better chance than the first.
airkas1 wrote:Congrats on 100!
DL747 wrote:Congratulations on 100, hope to see many more!
airkas1 wrote:49M:
The photo of the left side of the aircraft, with the tower in the background is the best one from that series (2nd of the 4 links). Blurryness isn't that bad, so should be passable in a smaller size.
airkas1 wrote:Sorry I had to reject it, but I think you made an editing boo-boo.
Photo you linked on forum: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 98f79e4da0
Rejected photo: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 58bd03600a
Compare the tail and sky above the treeline. Definitely something off there, likely due to editing brushes. In general the sky is also worse than the forum file. Did you make a fresh edit?
dutchspotter1 wrote:Frankly, the windows and the American flag on the tail look quite blurry to me (soft at best).
airkas1 wrote:What's the ID?