wiggys photos

airkas1 · Tue Apr 30, 2019 10:36 am

You need to right-click the photo and copy the URL. Any link with the word "photo-corner" in it will not work. The links should look like this:
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... e9ca89613e
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 9e97853189

#1 is incredibly poor. Poor light, super oversharpened, way too distant.
#2 is very low in frame, underexposed, oversharpened, needs CCW,
Please look in the database of accepted photos to see how they compare to your photos.

Crosswindphoto · Tue Apr 30, 2019 4:32 pm

#1 to me doesn't look fixable, #2 looks like it could be fixable.
However, both photos (especially #1) wont make it at 1920px, 1280px would be good place to start.

wiggy · Wed May 01, 2019 6:28 am

I sharpened these photos on photoshop and i made that wasn't over 100

Crosswindphoto · Wed May 01, 2019 10:17 am

As Kas said, they’re OVERsharpened. A good way of telling if this is the case is if there are jaggy lines on the straight edges of things. Just turn down the sharpening a bit and fix the other points and the second one should be ok. The first will never make it.

airkas1 · Wed May 01, 2019 12:49 pm

Honestly, both will not make it. The second one requires too much fixing and starting quality is not good enough.

wiggy · Wed May 01, 2019 11:56 pm

mm thats what i thought

wiggy · Wed May 01, 2019 11:57 pm

i'll try smart sharpen on photoshop then

wiggy · Tue May 14, 2019 9:08 am

what number do you think I should sharpen my photos to ? fill free to reply to the comment

airkas1 · Tue May 14, 2019 4:30 pm

I use amount 30%, radius 0,3px and noise 0%.

wiggy · Tue May 14, 2019 9:35 pm

[quote="airkas1"]I use amount 30%, radius 0,3px and noise 0%.[/quote

thinks i'll give it go

wiggy · Wed May 22, 2019 3:16 am

why does a photo have bad quality when screening but clear when you click on it ?

wiggy · Wed May 22, 2019 3:17 am

is it how it looks if it was accepted or what

airkas1 · Wed May 22, 2019 10:14 am

During screening, we see the photo how they were uploaded.

wiggy · Wed May 22, 2019 11:12 am

wiggy · Wed May 29, 2019 4:07 am

hi guys im after some feedback on these photos and do you think they could be improved more or sty as they are ?

wiggy · Wed May 29, 2019 4:09 am

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 545087.jpg?

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... e592618bd4

wiggy · Wed May 29, 2019 4:10 am

i would appreciate your feedback

airkas1 · Wed May 29, 2019 9:49 am

F900: Sky is very overexposed and the photo is severly oversharpened. It's also insufficient quality for that size and blurry/out of focus.
CL60: needs CW rotation (to the right), a tighter crop on the right side, insufficient quality for the size.

Sorry to say I don't think either of them will make it, even with the necessary adjustments. But to end on a positive note, these photos are already an improvement over your earlier examples.

wiggy · Wed May 29, 2019 11:23 am

thanks kas would the CL60 be worth editing again or not ? and also for some reason a guy like you I always get scared what the comment is going to be.

wiggy · Mon Jun 03, 2019 2:06 am

any thoughts on these photos ?

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 8f6a9458c2

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... d863e86fa4

DL747 · Mon Jun 03, 2019 5:32 am

Tiger is probably not worth even attempting an edit due to poor lighting conditions, the second aircraft (not good with vintage military types, sorry) is quite noisy and lacks the quality for that size. The light is also posing some issues as it has blown out the wing/fuselage.

wiggy · Mon Jun 03, 2019 7:44 am

okay I will pull them from the que then

wiggy · Wed Jun 05, 2019 10:50 pm

have i been banned uploading

Crosswindphoto · Thu Jun 06, 2019 10:09 am

I hate to point out the obvious and sound like a jerk, but, if you go to the upload screen, and it won't let you upload, you have either been banned uploading, or you've reached your queue limit.

airkas1 · Thu Jun 06, 2019 10:49 am

wiggy wrote:
have i been banned uploading

No.

wiggy · Fri Jun 07, 2019 2:54 am

airkas1 wrote:
wiggy wrote:
have i been banned uploading

No.

thanks because i had this photo rejected for on of the reasons banding and i thought it mean't that i was banned uploading
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 9cc87c745c

wiggy · Tue Jun 11, 2019 3:17 am

hi all any thoughts on this photo
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 301eabee9d

JakTrax · Wed Jun 12, 2019 5:58 pm

Serious oversharpening and compression. Light is poor also. Not a chance in its current form.

airkas1 · Wed Jun 12, 2019 7:16 pm

Distance, compression, oversharpened, noisy, quality.

Crosswindphoto · Wed Jun 12, 2019 7:34 pm

All of the above are true, but with fixing I think this one might be ok!

wiggy · Thu Jun 13, 2019 12:35 am

Crosswindphoto wrote:
All of the above are true, but with fixing I think this one might be ok!

I tried to fix it

wiggy · Fri Jul 26, 2019 12:36 am

i just had this photo rejected in priority for a registration for the data base , any thoughts on how i can fix it

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 37d511d9bd

looking to your feedback

Crosswindphoto · Fri Jul 26, 2019 4:44 am

What was it rejected for?
From what I can see it’s underexposed and the crop is a little on the loose side.

Crosswindphoto · Fri Jul 26, 2019 5:51 am

On a second look I'm also noticing that it is over sharpened. It is hard to say whether or not it will be fixable.

Tim

wiggy · Fri Jul 26, 2019 11:18 am

COME ON !!!!!!!!!! I can not seem to get the sharpness right for some reason

reasons
personal message
soft
size
quality
underexposed

thanks for the feedback Tim!!!!

Crosswindphoto · Fri Jul 26, 2019 11:33 am

What did the personal message say?

jelpee · Fri Jul 26, 2019 12:35 pm

Definitely underexposed, right in frame and needs a tighter crop. Sharpening seems passable. OVerall quality seems marginal at best. Perhaps and increase in brightness and contrast along with a smaller size will help.

Jehan

wiggy · Fri Jul 26, 2019 11:09 pm

Crosswindphoto wrote:
What did the personal message say?

please try a lower resolution

wiggy · Fri Jul 26, 2019 11:10 pm

jelpee wrote:
Definitely underexposed, right in frame and needs a tighter crop. Sharpening seems passable. OVerall quality seems marginal at best. Perhaps and increase in brightness and contrast along with a smaller size will help.

Jehan

thanks i'll give it a go

wiggy · Fri Jul 26, 2019 11:12 pm

jelpee wrote:
Definitely underexposed, right in frame and needs a tighter crop. Sharpening seems passable. OVerall quality seems marginal at best. Perhaps and increase in brightness and contrast along with a smaller size will help.

Jehan

should I try again ?

jelpee · Sat Jul 27, 2019 12:20 am

Lets see what you get with another try.

wiggy · Sat Jul 27, 2019 1:26 am

jelpee wrote:
Lets see what you get with another try.

Still rejected i did what you said

jelpee · Sat Jul 27, 2019 3:01 pm

wiggy wrote:
jelpee wrote:
Lets see what you get with another try.

Still rejected i did what you said

Some details, please along with the reworked image.

Jehan

Crosswindphoto · Sat Jul 27, 2019 3:42 pm

Showing us the RAW file(s) might help.

wiggy · Sun Jul 28, 2019 4:59 am

sorry but the thumbnail won't work on the computer i'm using

wiggy · Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:02 am

any thoughts on this photo ?

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 81afad8974

spompert · Mon Jul 29, 2019 6:51 am

I can see that the left side of the photo looks blurry. Also the outside is overexposed.

wiggy · Mon Jul 29, 2019 8:00 am

spompert wrote:
I can see that the left side of the photo looks blurry. Also the outside is overexposed.

thanks for your feedback, I noticed that in the email from the screener

wiggy · Mon Jul 29, 2019 11:22 am

I was so close to having accepted but it got rejected only for oversharpened.

airkas1 · Mon Jul 29, 2019 2:05 pm

Protip #1: not all photos are suited for 1920px size. Don't use that size when just beginning. Keep it in the 1200-1400/1600px wide range.

VH-ZAL is overexposed and blurry, likely due to insufficient Depth of Field. There is no EXIF available for that photo, so I can't see what aperture you shot it at, but anything less than F8 is likely going to get you DOF problems. The crop is also a bit too wide and the horizon doesn't look level.

Who is online

Popular Searches On Airliners.net