I would like to get some advise, related to a recent rejection. ID: 5645669
The shot was first rejected for underexposed. I asked for a second opinion via the appeal-function. In appeal, the screener agreed that exposure was OK, but It was rejected for "motiv" (reason via personal message: rejected because part of the engine was cut-off).
Although the rejection message stated that I could appeal to the head-screeners, I see no way to appeal since it was already rejected after a first appeal (maybe the rejection e-mail can be adjusted?).
I accept the rejection and the screeners' decision, but I would still like to know whether this type of shot is no longer acceptable? I have several of these (just a close-up of the vertical tail, and only part of the exhaust(s) visible) accepted in the past, but I know that rules can change:
Thanks for any advise!