Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
airkas1 wrote:All 3 looks fine in terms of quality, but the ANZ and Asiana need a lot of CW rotation. I hope there is room for that in the original files.
JKPhotos wrote:Hi,
Delta 763: Blurry, soft. Not fixable.
Asiana 380: a bit underexposed, soft
KE380: passable
Volaris 320: Would sharpen the windows more
AA / PSA: Soft / flat (low contrast)
Julien
JKPhotos wrote:Hey,
The Volaris isn't far off, might be even acceptable as it is. To make sure I would recommend to sharpen the "window-line" more.
I think with some more sharpening and Contrast the PSA would be acceptable as well. Same for the Asiana if you add some exposure and sharpening. They are really not far off.
Cheers,
Julien
Crosswindphoto wrote:Condor: Looks a little soft towards the front of the image.
Atlas: Poor light, also has a magenta colour cast, needs more green.
An124: Is the same Atlas photo, wrong link?
Korean: Passable I think, the colours look off a tiny bit, but probably passable.
Etihad 777: Possible light/motive rejection, most of the plane is in shadow, so it may vary screener to screener.
Air Tahiti: Something looks off about the front/titles. the nose looks blurry, while the titles look OS and Blurry.
Qantas: Borderline for Heat Haze, also a little flat.
Lufthansa: Looks ok.
EVA: Looks ok as well.
Tim
Crosswindphoto wrote:Looks a bit soft in my eyes, maybe a touch magenta as well.
otherwise fine.
Tim