Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
jelpee wrote:Softness may be acceptable. It is true that there are images in the DB with the tail cropped, but most of them are where the nose gear is at the bottom of the frame. Doesn't seem to be the case here. IMO, the crop of the tip of the tail could have been avoided. Here's one of mine with the tail crop which works: https://www.airliners.net/search?keywords=5662573
Jehan
TonySteph wrote:Hello guyz,
I just received the screening's result of my A318CJ nightshot and it ended up with a motive rejection. I think that the marshaller is a bit much present (i was afraid of). Sadly i don't have other pics without him.
Otherwise, the dornier one has been accepted to the database. Many thanks again for the advices everyone.
Best regards
jelpee wrote:Sorry to hear about the rejection. Perhaps you could appeal on the basis that the marshaller is not blocking engines or landing gear and is relevant to the composition. Stuff like that is up to screener discretion. I would appeal if I were you with an appropriate reason for the appeal. Hope it works.
Jehan
Kaphias wrote:TonySteph wrote:Hello guyz,
I just received the screening's result of my A318CJ nightshot and it ended up with a motive rejection. I think that the marshaller is a bit much present (i was afraid of). Sadly i don't have other pics without him.
Otherwise, the dornier one has been accepted to the database. Many thanks again for the advices everyone.
Best regards
Too bad. I'm sure it would have been accepted if the marshaller was wearing a bikini.
cmandel wrote:Congrats Tony, your photo is on the Top 5. Great one.