Color looks not so bad I think, but as screener mentioned that the body of the a.c has a little bit magenta / reddish color.
That's only what the H.S. said after appeal (which has unfortunately become almost a standard procedure after any initial rejection), however the 'regular' screener rejected it for high in frame and underexposed. No mentioning of any colour flaws whatsoever (I had already reduced the reddish cast compared to my previous upload).
Don't get me wrong, I like the principle of screening (an extra pair of eyes) since a photographer might sometimes miss certain flaws and it COULD give valuable feedback in order to improve photography (or rather photo editing) skills. With these subjective/arbitrary rejections, however, it feels more like a roulette game. I've had dozens of photos accepted from this day/location, all edited in exactly the same way, so I doubt that none of those have the same reddish cast, are underexposed or high in frame.
I have just uploaded a new version: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 65c8d91ae5
Wondering if it will be rejected again for reddish cast or if it will be cyan cast this time. I guess I will find out in about 10 days