Alright so I think I've learned a bit from my last rejected photos and reading some of the threads here, now I've got a new batch of photos that I was hoping to get some feedback on. They are the full size photos so you can see the detail so just be warned before clicking.
https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img924/2589/vh5Egh.jpg
https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img924/6416/wS8vTC.jpg
https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img924/9072/BgIaLs.jpg
Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
-
- Crosswindphoto
- Posts: 379
- Joined:
Re: Pre-screening RT145
All 3 need to be sized down to the correct size for upload before any useable advice can be offered.
Tim
Tim
Re: Pre-screening RT145
I would agree that they need to be resized and cropped. I also feel that they may be considered under exposed too - especially the AA 737
Re: Pre-screening RT145
So, for more accurate advices on your pre-screening photos I would strongly suggest you to post those photos after fully editing because we screen your after editing-version not originals although originals can be helpful for explaning something （ i.e. blurry）.
Rgrds,
Harry
Rgrds,
Harry
Re: Pre-screening RT145
Alright how about these. I resized them and adjusted the exposure.
https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img923/481/asCmpy.jpg
https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img922/2224/m84dkK.jpg
https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img922/1674/ZLu1u1.jpg
https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img923/481/asCmpy.jpg
https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img922/2224/m84dkK.jpg
https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img922/1674/ZLu1u1.jpg
-
- Crosswindphoto
- Posts: 379
- Joined:
Re: Pre-screening RT145
Would still need a tighter crop.
All 3 lack contrast and are soft. Might be ok at 1200px wide.
Also very compressed, but that could be something to do with the place you uploaded the photos.
Tim
All 3 lack contrast and are soft. Might be ok at 1200px wide.
Also very compressed, but that could be something to do with the place you uploaded the photos.
Tim
Re: Pre-screening RT145
How tight does the crop need to be? Basically right on top of the plane?
Re: Pre-screening RT145
RT145 wrote:How tight does the crop need to be? Basically right on top of the plane?
Take a look through the database and you'll see what's typically acceptable.
Re: Pre-screening RT145
All three originals are pretty noisy and the Learjet is blurry. While the site only screens your 'finished product' (i.e. your final edit) it's far easier to pick out flaws in the originals.
Re: Pre-screening RT145
Alright I've cropped them down a bit more and adjusted the contrast and sharpness
https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img924/5333/Yd3YtX.jpg
https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img923/2782/ClbOl0.jpg
https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img922/8435/X2NiJn.jpg
https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img924/5333/Yd3YtX.jpg
https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img923/2782/ClbOl0.jpg
https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img922/8435/X2NiJn.jpg
Re: Pre-screening RT145
The Learjet is a non-starter as it's blurry. The other two are noisy and I see editing artefacts/compression around various parts of the aircraft. Are you taking these photos at the camera's maximum quality? Are you saving them once edited at maximum quality?
Re: Pre-screening RT145
Photos are definitely taken at the maximum quality, they're exported from lightroom reduced to the max size for a.net although I'm thinking it might be the pixels per inch setting which is currently at 240
Re: Pre-screening RT145
What camera are you using? The original images seem to be very noisy and a little sharper than I'd expect straight from the camera.
Re: Pre-screening RT145
90D, but the originals aren't the straight out of the camera originals. They were with edits I just didn't shrink them down because I figured it would be helpful to notice defects.
Re: Pre-screening RT145
RT145 wrote:Photos are definitely taken at the maximum quality, they're exported from lightroom reduced to the max size for a.net although I'm thinking it might be the pixels per inch setting which is currently at 240
Pixels per inch doesn't matter unless you're physically printing photos. Having it set at 1 or 1000 will make no difference here.
Re: Pre-screening RT145
Okay. Either you're doing something wrong during editing or your settings in camera are off. What aperture, shutter speed and ISO were they captured at?
Re: Pre-screening RT145
I had shot these on auto when I was trying out my Sigma 70-200 2.8. The Fedex was ISO100, 5.6 and 1/1000.
Re: Pre-screening RT145
Learn about the camera and stay out of auto mode. Those images really are not reflective of those settings so I suspect you're either doing something wrong during processing or not using the 90D's maximum quality settings.
Re: Pre-screening RT145
Alright let's try something a little different.
Turns out lightroom was default set at only exporting at 60% quality. That may have been part of the issue before. I've since fixed that and I also recently took this photo. Let me know what you think.
https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img923/61/UKSx4x.jpg
Turns out lightroom was default set at only exporting at 60% quality. That may have been part of the issue before. I've since fixed that and I also recently took this photo. Let me know what you think.
https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img923/61/UKSx4x.jpg
-
- Crosswindphoto
- Posts: 379
- Joined:
Re: Pre-screening RT145
Very noisy/compressed, low in frame, the tail is a bit soft/blurry, would e better at 1200px.
Tim
Tim
-
- Crosswindphoto
- Posts: 379
- Joined:
Re: Pre-screening RT145
Noisy, Low in frame, very compressed, and still a bit soft.
Like before, would be better are 1200px
Tim
Like before, would be better are 1200px
Tim
Re: Pre-screening RT145
Image quality is still a bit low, you need to improve it even further
Re: Pre-screening RT145
With this one the only critique was that it is underexposed. What do you guys think? I feel like if I up the exposure the plane itself will be blown out.
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 292cccb718
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 292cccb718
Re: Pre-screening RT145
Could stand a bit more brightness but it's not underexposed — looks acceptable to me. The clutter is more of a problem (for me at least).
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests