Page 1 of 1

bnoble feedback

Posted: Thu May 28, 2020 6:50 pm
by bnoble
Hi everyone,
First time using the forum, although I have been using A.net for a while. I recently got the following image accepted (https://www.airliners.net/photo/Untitle ... T2/6035529). However, upon submitting it to another website, they rejected it for backlighting. I wanted to get a second opinion: is it really backlit or is the other website wrong. Thanks!

Re: bnoble feedback

Posted: Thu May 28, 2020 7:27 pm
by Crosswindphoto
Looks fine to me. If the other website starts with a J, expect a lot of similar rejections on that site.

Tim

Re: bnoble feedback

Posted: Thu May 28, 2020 7:39 pm
by bnoble
Thanks for the clarification Tim!

Re: bnoble feedback

Posted: Thu May 28, 2020 8:36 pm
by dutchspotter1
Not really backlight but not ideal light either. Curious how it got accepted here though as it looks blurry (e.g. top of the tail) and oversharped.

Re: bnoble feedback

Posted: Thu May 28, 2020 11:30 pm
by jelpee
Some slight jaggies on the rotor blades, but not show stopping. Lighting looks fine. New registration as well to the site.

Jehan

Re: bnoble feedback

Posted: Fri May 29, 2020 12:33 am
by bnoble
Thanks for the feedback Jehan. Should I submit a new version with slightly less sharpening?

Re: bnoble feedback

Posted: Fri May 29, 2020 1:39 am
by jelpee
Brady,
Do you mean resubmit a better version to a.net, or the other site? If the former, it is not necessary, unless you really want to. Just use the reupload function.

If the latter, I can’t speak for the acceptance criteria of the other site. For me at a.net, it’s well within acceptable standards. If they have an option similar to our “Appeal” function, perhaps that might be an opportunity to have them take another look. If backlighting was the only issue, sounds like you have a reasonable chance of getting it accepted.

I’d be interested in knowing the outcome.

Regards,

Jehan

Re: bnoble feedback

Posted: Fri May 29, 2020 5:17 pm
by bnoble
I was referring to Airliners, but if its not a big deal, I'll leave it be. I also did use the appeal function and it got in, so it must have been a mistake. Thanks for the help!

Re: bnoble feedback

Posted: Sun May 31, 2020 2:20 pm
by bnoble
Hi,
Would a screener mind pre-screening the following images currently awaiting review?

6041941
6041945
6041947 (On a side note, does this count as a "classic airliner?")
6041951

Thanks!

Re: bnoble feedback

Posted: Sun May 31, 2020 2:54 pm
by jelpee
Hi there Brady,

My thoughts:

6041941: Will get rejected for Motive due to the cover; aircraft with covers are only accepted if it is the first submission. There is already an image of the aircraft (also covered) from 2014.
6041949: Has a red/yellow color cast. I'd recommend correcting it.
6041947: Looks acceptable to me
6041951: Looks acceptable to me.

Regards,

Jehan

Re: bnoble feedback

Posted: Sun May 31, 2020 3:03 pm
by bnoble
Thanks for the help! I think I will give up on the Boatpix as there is nothing that can be done about the cover

Re: bnoble feedback

Posted: Sun May 31, 2020 3:06 pm
by bnoble
On 2 side notes, should I label the Trans-Canada as a classic airliner? Also, would it be best to label the PC-12 as "Planesense" or "Untitled"? I have gotten Planesense aircraft accepted with both labels. Thanks!

Re: bnoble feedback

Posted: Sun May 31, 2020 7:16 pm
by jelpee
bnoble wrote:
On 2 side notes, should I label the Trans-Canada as a classic airliner? Also, would it be best to label the PC-12 as "Planesense" or "Untitled"? I have gotten Planesense aircraft accepted with both labels. Thanks!


My apologies for not answering the above questions...

Yes, mark the Connie as a "Classic Airliner." You wont get a rejection for incorrectly designating this since screeners can make corrections to this field. If there are other flaws with the image, you will likely be told that the "Category" is wrong with a message saying "Please Other mark as "Classic"".


The PC-12, mark as Airline as "Untitled" and Owner as "Private." If titles are not on the aircraft, always mark as "Untitled." Some airlines have unmarked aircraft. If you know them to belong to an airline, then list the airline in the second field. E.g. if it is a DHL cargo B737 that is all white with no titles on the fuselage, if you mark it as recommended, it will then appear as "Untitled (DHL)." Sometimes, the titles are inconspicuous. In that case, it it is visible, always list the airline in the primary slot. I believe the Acceptance Guide explains this in detail.

Unfortunately, the Screening Team cannot edit/modify the Airline filed. Therefore, if that is incorrectly designated, it will be rejected.The "Owner" field can be modified/revised by the screeners. If that's the only issue, we simply correct it and accept the image.

Regards,

Jehan

Re: bnoble feedback

Posted: Sun May 31, 2020 8:19 pm
by bnoble
Thank you, that clears that up

Re: bnoble feedback

Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2020 12:49 am
by bnoble
Hi,
Can I get some feedback on 6085739?
Thanks!

Re: bnoble feedback

Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2020 3:35 pm
by bnoble
Hi all, I really want to get the American Airlines retro livery in, but the light was very poor the day I took the photo. Is there anything I should adjust in this?

N921NN.jpg

Re: bnoble feedback

Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2020 1:08 am
by HarryLi
Hi Brandy,

Could you please share a link of the corresponding photo to us here ? I can't access to the photo you mentioned above. Thanks.

Sincerely,

Re: bnoble feedback

Posted: Sat Aug 01, 2020 1:44 am
by bnoble
Hi, I actually deleted that photo, but it would be helpful if you could check 6107693, Thanks!

Re: bnoble feedback

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2020 5:07 pm
by HarryLi
bnoble wrote:
Hi, I actually deleted that photo, but it would be helpful if you could check 6107693, Thanks!

Would like to confirm if it's Cessna 608A taken at JXN ? Although it's ok to do so, highly recommend you to post links in the threads so that everyone can provide their thought on it if you like ! Since we, screeners, are not fully online to check here frequently. As a result, our replies would be slowly. Hope you can understand ; )

Cheers,
Harry

Re: bnoble feedback

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2020 5:21 pm
by bnoble
That's the one!

Re: bnoble feedback

Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2020 2:42 pm
by HarryLi
That one looks pretty soft for me especially the nose gear area. Besides, it also looks low contrast and underexposed for me probably due to the poor weather situation I guess. If you want to make adjustments on it, ensure don't make more noise in sky.

Re: bnoble feedback

Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 12:30 am
by bnoble
Ok, that was my concern. Probably best to just take it out. Thanks for the help!

Re: bnoble feedback

Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2020 1:05 pm
by bnoble
Hi, can I get a pre-screen for ID # 6160563, 6160565, 6160571, 6160573, 6160577?
Thanks in advance

Re: bnoble feedback

Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2020 8:46 am
by HarryLi
6160563: Overall looks ok for me. There is a bird-like thing above the aircraft, which would be better to be removed IMO. Since it's hard to be recognized even in some large screen. Probably would lead to Dirty Rejection.

6160565: A visible dirty circle spot in the upper left corner. Otherwise, looks ok.
6160571: Fine for me.
6160573: Severe halo surround the aircraft especially upper edge. (Black edges); Slightly Oversharpened for me as well.
6160577: Fine for me.

Regards,

Re: bnoble feedback

Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2020 1:12 pm
by bnoble
Thanks Harry, I will take out the ones that won't get accepted.

Re: bnoble feedback

Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2020 7:18 pm
by bnoble
Hi,
Could I get a prescreen for #6166701, Thanks

Re: bnoble feedback

Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2020 5:42 am
by HarryLi
I just took a look at it. The body looks blurry and oversharpened at some parts as well due to blurry. Probably would be better with a better angle in this series.

Regards,
Harry

Re: bnoble feedback

Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2020 12:25 pm
by bnoble
Thank you,
I will remove it

Re: bnoble feedback

Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2020 4:42 pm
by bnoble
Hi Harry,
I was wondering if either #6160571 or 63 would be worth an appeal. Thanks in advance!

https://www.airliners.net/user/photo-co ... to/6160571
https://www.airliners.net/user/photo-co ... to/6160563

Re: bnoble feedback

Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 1:23 pm
by HarryLi
I would do so although the second one does look marginal at quality respect ( Sky has bit of noisy ). The first one (71), I can't recognize obvious borders and heat haze.

Regards,
Harry

Re: bnoble feedback

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 8:02 pm
by bnoble
Hi Harry,
I just got a photo up that includes a new special scheme for the db (https://www.airliners.net/photo/Untitle ... he/6179403) Wouldn't this qualify for the banner as it is a new special scheme?
Thanks

Re: bnoble feedback

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 8:37 pm
by jelpee
bnoble wrote:
Hi Harry,
I just got a photo up that includes a new special scheme for the db (https://www.airliners.net/photo/Untitle ... he/6179403) Wouldn't this qualify for the banner as it is a new special scheme?
Thanks


Banners for new schemes is only for airlines and armed forces. It does not apply for Private or Business aircraft.

Regards,

Jehan

Re: bnoble feedback

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 10:02 pm
by bnoble
Thank you Jehan, that makes sense now!