All,
Rejected for oversharp. Looking now I can see a few jaggies I didn't notice last night (flap fairings, red part of the tail, titles) but what puzzles me is the screener comment: "Try uploading at lower resolution". Lowering the resolution won't mitigate oversharpening (if anything it'll worsen it) — since there were no other rejection reasons I'm failing to understand how the image would benefit from being smaller. Quality is certainly there for 1900 pixels.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/130333117 ... /lightbox/
Cheers,
Karl
Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Re: Post-screening — oversharp
The image shows jaggies in various places and shows it clearly at this large size. The recommendation by the screeners to try a smaller size is that that it would perhaps mask some of the jaggies. At 1900 pixels everything is clear in view, but also magnifies any minor flaws.
Jehan
Jehan
Re: Post-screening — oversharp
Fair enough, but wouldn't another solution be to just tone down the sharpening and retain the 1900 pixels? The comment was a bit ambiguous and led me to believe the screener deemed the overall quality to be insufficient.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests