Prescreening Advice

Adam8080 · Sun May 02, 2021 11:13 am

Hi there,

I am new to Airliners.net with little experience with sites like this one.
Could I please have some advice about these two images? I think that they should be fine however I cannot find a guidelines list so I cannot confirm.
I have attached the links to the images below.

The Qantas B738 is 1400px wide
The HiFly A343 is 1280px wide

Thank you so much in advance!
Adam

jelpee · Sun May 02, 2021 7:29 pm

Hello Adam,

Welcome to airlines.net.

The Qantas 737 needs some CW rotation. The runway and the fence posts in the background are leaning to the left. Also the aircraft could use some sharpening.
CS-TQY A330 could benefit from some contrast. Otherwise IMPO it looks fine.

The Acceptance Guide can be found on the Photo Upload page or here:www.airliners.net/faq/photo_acceptance_guide/

Hope this helps.

Cheers,

Jehan

Adam8080 · Mon May 03, 2021 12:13 am

jelpee wrote:
Hello Adam,

Welcome to airlines.net.

The Qantas 737 needs some CW rotation. The runway and the fence posts in the background are leaning to the left. Also the aircraft could use some sharpening.
CS-TQY A330 could benefit from some contrast. Otherwise IMPO it looks fine.

Hope this helps.

Cheers,

Jehan

Hi Jehan,

Thank you so much for reviewing my images. I think I will upload CS-TQY with a little bit extra contrast.
I have altered the QFA 738 slightly to match your suggestions, I probably got it wrong but here it is anyway.

Thank you again for providing your suggestions!

Thanks,
Adam

Crosswindphoto · Mon May 03, 2021 8:38 am

Hello Adam,

QFA 737 still leaning a bit left in my eyes, but is now much better sharpening wise.
Really nice light as well!

Tim

jelpee · Tue May 04, 2021 11:18 pm

Agree with Tim. It needs CW rotation. If you align the runway to be horizontal it should be good.

Jehan

Adam8080 · Sun May 09, 2021 3:31 am

Crosswindphoto wrote:
Hello Adam,

QFA 737 still leaning a bit left in my eyes, but is now much better sharpening wise.
Really nice light as well!

Tim

jelpee wrote:
Agree with Tim. It needs CW rotation. If you align the runway to be horizontal it should be good.

Jehan

Hi Jehan and Tim,

Thank you for your advice, I have decided not to upload the Qantas 737 but did go ahead with the HiFly A343.
Could I please hear your thoughts on this image? It is a Nauru Boeing 737-300 that I believe is based here in Brisbane!
I have attached the link to the image below.

Thank you so much,
Adam

jelpee · Sun May 09, 2021 3:18 pm

Could use some CW rotation. Also the rear section looks a tad soft and could use some sharpening.

Jehan

Adam8080 · Mon May 24, 2021 12:11 pm

jelpee wrote:
Could use some CW rotation. Also the rear section looks a tad soft and could use some sharpening.

Jehan

Hi Jehan,

Thanks for taking a look at PNI. It does look quite soft and noisy toward to tail so I might not upload it to the queue.
Could I please hear your thoughts on my image of VH-YWE. I am pretty happy with it however I am not overly experienced with photography so I'd love some guidance.

Thanks,
Adam

Crosswindphoto · Mon May 24, 2021 4:13 pm

Looks a little Over Exposed to me, as well as high in frame, should be fixable.

Tim

Adam8080 · Wed Jun 02, 2021 11:01 pm

Crosswindphoto wrote:
Looks a little Over Exposed to me, as well as high in frame, should be fixable.

Tim

Thanks for your feedback Tim. I am not super happy with that shot so I might avoid uploading it altogether. It is both dark and overexposed so yeah, I dont want to upload something Im not happy with.
Could I please hear your opinions on these two images. The first being an image of VH-YAI [1600px] and an image of VH-VPF [1600px].

Kind Regards,
Adam

Crosswindphoto · Thu Jun 03, 2021 5:56 am

GLEX: Probably acceptable as is, however the crop look weird imo. Personally I would crop it right up to the engine on the left side of the image. IT also could do with a slight hit of ccw roation.

VH-VPF: Definitely high in frame. otherwise it looks ok.

Tim

Adam8080 · Fri Jun 04, 2021 1:06 pm

Crosswindphoto wrote:
GLEX: Probably acceptable as is, however the crop look weird imo. Personally I would crop it right up to the engine on the left side of the image. IT also could do with a slight hit of ccw roation.

VH-VPF: Definitely high in frame. otherwise it looks ok.

Tim

Hi Tim,

I tried the crop you suggested on the GLEX however I just didn't like how it looked. I prefer to give the fuselage a little more space and have it in the 'sort of' centre of the image. I will leave the image in the queue and if it gets rejected for horizon I'll do as you suggest and adjust it slightly. I have attached another link to VH-VPF, I hope that it looks a bit better now since I have lowered the aircraft.

Thank you for your feedback, it is really appreciated.

Kind Regards,
Adam

Crosswindphoto · Fri Jun 04, 2021 5:36 pm

VH-VPF still high in frame imo.

Tim

Adam8080 · Sun Jun 06, 2021 11:51 am

Crosswindphoto wrote:
VH-VPF still high in frame imo.

Tim

Hi Tim,

Thank you again for providing your feedback!
I am having a hard time centring this image. :lol:

Kind Regards,
Adam

jelpee · Sun Jun 06, 2021 1:05 pm

Still looks High. In this case the tail dominates the perspective and factors into the centering. Centering based on the fuselage alone will render it High in Frame.
A good way to judge is to look at a thumbnail sized version of the image. In the case of this image, the thumbnail says HIF. Screeners use this method when evaluating images.

Regards,

Jehan

Adam8080 · Mon Jun 07, 2021 9:07 am

jelpee wrote:
Still looks High. In this case the tail dominates the perspective and factors into the centering. Centering based on the fuselage alone will render it High in Frame.
A good way to judge is to look at a thumbnail sized version of the image. In the case of this image, the thumbnail says HIF. Screeners use this method when evaluating images.

Regards,

Jehan

Hi Jehan,

Thank you for providing me with that method. I have tried utilising the thumbnail sized version of this image.
I think it looks pretty good but my lack of experience leads me to believe that I could be wrong.

Kind Regards,
Adam

jelpee · Mon Jun 07, 2021 12:03 pm

Hello Adam,

I looked at the thumbnail sized version of this and the centering looks acceptable to me.

Best regards,

Jehan

jelpee · Mon Jun 07, 2021 12:04 pm

Duplicate post--disregard.

Adam8080 · Mon Jun 07, 2021 12:57 pm

jelpee wrote:
Hello Adam,

I looked at the thumbnail sized version of this and the centering looks acceptable to me.

Best regards,

Jehan

Thank you for taking a look. I really appreciate it. I will leave that image in the queue then and see how it goes!
Thank you for your help as well Tim.

Thanks,
Adam

Adam8080 · Sat Jun 12, 2021 12:36 pm

Hi all,

Could I please have some feedback on this image?

Thanks,
Adam

dutchspotter1 · Sat Jun 12, 2021 1:23 pm

High in frame (when factoring in the tail), fuselage lacks contrast and is borderline overexposed.

Adam8080 · Thu Jun 17, 2021 10:18 am

dutchspotter1 wrote:
High in frame (when factoring in the tail), fuselage lacks contrast and is borderline overexposed.

Thank you Dutchspotter1.
I think I will be leaving that image for my offline collection.

Thanks,
Adam

Adam8080 · Thu Jun 17, 2021 10:30 am

Hi All,

Could I please have some feedback on this image?
I am pretty happy with it however I just wanted to get a second opinion before it spends a while in the queue just to be rejected.

Thanks,
Adam

thomps65 · Wed Jun 23, 2021 1:52 pm

[quote="Adam8080"]Hi All,

Could I please have some feedback on this image?
I am pretty happy with it however I just wanted to get a second opinion before it spends a while in the queue just to be rejected.

Thanks,
Adam

Hey Adam

The photo needs more contrast. By panning the camera to follow the subject, the background blurs nicely, accentuating the speed and motion of the airplane.

Thanks

Starfuryt · Wed Jun 23, 2021 5:27 pm

The titles look blurry and the text on the forward gear bay door is nearly unreadable.

Adam8080 · Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:27 am

Hi A.net crew,

Could a crew member please pre-screen photo ID #6478589 (Qantas 747)?

Thank you so much,
Adam

jelpee · Thu Jul 01, 2021 10:55 pm

Looks like it has a heavy yellow color cast even for sunset lighting. Otherwise OK for me.

Jehan

Adam8080 · Sat Jul 03, 2021 12:46 pm

jelpee wrote:
Looks like it has a heavy yellow color cast even for sunset lighting. Otherwise OK for me.

Jehan

I see, thank you for taking a look. I might pull that shot out of the queue.

Thanks again,
Adam

Adam8080 · Sat Jul 10, 2021 5:12 pm

Hi A.net crew,

Could a screener please pre-screen two images?
The first is VH-ZNC (B789) Queue ID: 6487633
And the second is F-ONEO (A339) Queue ID: 6487623

Thank you,
Adam

Prescreening Advice

Prescreening Advice

Re: Prescreening Advice

Re: Prescreening Advice

Re: Prescreening Advice

Re: Prescreening Advice

Re: Prescreening Advice

Re: Prescreening Advice

Re: Prescreening Advice

Re: Prescreening Advice

Re: Prescreening Advice

Re: Prescreening Advice

Re: Prescreening Advice

Re: Prescreening Advice

Re: Prescreening Advice

Re: Prescreening Advice

Re: Prescreening Advice

Re: Prescreening Advice

Re: Prescreening Advice

Re: Prescreening Advice

Re: Prescreening Advice

Re: Prescreening Advice

Re: Prescreening Advice

Re: Prescreening Advice

Re: Prescreening Advice

Re: Prescreening Advice

Re: Prescreening Advice

Re: Prescreening Advice

Re: Prescreening Advice

Re: Prescreening Advice

Who is online

Popular Searches On Airliners.net