Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
jelpee wrote:Hello Adam,
Welcome to airlines.net.
The Qantas 737 needs some CW rotation. The runway and the fence posts in the background are leaning to the left. Also the aircraft could use some sharpening.
CS-TQY A330 could benefit from some contrast. Otherwise IMPO it looks fine.
Hope this helps.
Cheers,
Jehan
Crosswindphoto wrote:Hello Adam,
QFA 737 still leaning a bit left in my eyes, but is now much better sharpening wise.
Really nice light as well!
Tim
jelpee wrote:Agree with Tim. It needs CW rotation. If you align the runway to be horizontal it should be good.
Jehan
jelpee wrote:Could use some CW rotation. Also the rear section looks a tad soft and could use some sharpening.
Jehan
Crosswindphoto wrote:Looks a little Over Exposed to me, as well as high in frame, should be fixable.
Tim
Crosswindphoto wrote:GLEX: Probably acceptable as is, however the crop look weird imo. Personally I would crop it right up to the engine on the left side of the image. IT also could do with a slight hit of ccw roation.
VH-VPF: Definitely high in frame. otherwise it looks ok.
Tim
Crosswindphoto wrote:VH-VPF still high in frame imo.
Tim
jelpee wrote:Still looks High. In this case the tail dominates the perspective and factors into the centering. Centering based on the fuselage alone will render it High in Frame.
A good way to judge is to look at a thumbnail sized version of the image. In the case of this image, the thumbnail says HIF. Screeners use this method when evaluating images.
Regards,
Jehan
jelpee wrote:Hello Adam,
I looked at the thumbnail sized version of this and the centering looks acceptable to me.
Best regards,
Jehan
dutchspotter1 wrote:High in frame (when factoring in the tail), fuselage lacks contrast and is borderline overexposed.
jelpee wrote:Looks like it has a heavy yellow color cast even for sunset lighting. Otherwise OK for me.
Jehan