Hi all,
This image was rejected for blurry after a creative screening.
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... ffa5da1f54
I don't see any problem, as I edited and submitted it after being rejected first for low contrast and blurry. I think digital noise or soft could be applied as rejection reasons, but I don't see any blurry part. Please let me know where and how blurry it is. Any feedback will be appreciated.
P.S.
The picture was first rejected after an appeal, I edited again and submitted for the second time. I think I just complied A.net rules and I know the image possibly be rejected, but don't understand why I had to be advised "DO NOT RESUBMIT THIS VERSION" with the capital letters by the screener.
Thanks,
Akira Uekawa
Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Re: [Post-Screening] Akira Uekawa JA67NH
Uekawa-San,
You omitted some key points: According to the screening log, this image was submitted and rejected 7 times for blurriness and low contrast, among other issues. The appeal screener also recommended that the image not be resubmitted. In using all capital letters, I think the last screener was trying to emphasize the point that this image cannot be fixed and therefore it not be submitted. It would be best if you shared the entire background of this image and screening history rather than just the parts that make the screeners look bad.
Regards,
Jehan
You omitted some key points: According to the screening log, this image was submitted and rejected 7 times for blurriness and low contrast, among other issues. The appeal screener also recommended that the image not be resubmitted. In using all capital letters, I think the last screener was trying to emphasize the point that this image cannot be fixed and therefore it not be submitted. It would be best if you shared the entire background of this image and screening history rather than just the parts that make the screeners look bad.
Regards,
Jehan
-
- akirauekawa
- Posts: 57
- Joined:
Re: [Post-Screening] Akira Uekawa JA67NH
jelpee-san,
Thank you so much for checking the screening log and pointing out the important part of this issue. If it seams that I was trying to make the screeners look bad on my Post #1, that is not what I wanted to say the most, and I apologize for my rude behavior. I always thank you all for the hard work.
Just to make it clear, I didn't submit this particular image 7 times actually. Those submissions include two images as I gave up the 1st one [Photo A] after some re-editing and one appeal were all rejected. The capital letters would be quite reasonable if I rudely tried one particular image 7 times, but I was a bit confused as I received the message for my 2nd image [Photo B].
Here is the full screening history (from my understanding)
[Photo A]
- Submission 1 : Rejected for underexposed, re-edited
- Submission 2 : Rejected for low contrast, re-edited
- Submission 3 : Rejected for blurry, CW rotation, underexposed
- Submission 4 : Appealed from Submission 3, rejected for blurry, CW rotation, underexposed
- Gave up [Photo A]
- Selected a different picture [Photo B]
[Photo B]
- Submission 5 : Rejected for blurry, low contrast
- Submission 6 : Appealed from Submission 5, rejected for blurry + personal message
Regards,
Akira Uekawa
Thank you so much for checking the screening log and pointing out the important part of this issue. If it seams that I was trying to make the screeners look bad on my Post #1, that is not what I wanted to say the most, and I apologize for my rude behavior. I always thank you all for the hard work.
Just to make it clear, I didn't submit this particular image 7 times actually. Those submissions include two images as I gave up the 1st one [Photo A] after some re-editing and one appeal were all rejected. The capital letters would be quite reasonable if I rudely tried one particular image 7 times, but I was a bit confused as I received the message for my 2nd image [Photo B].
Here is the full screening history (from my understanding)
[Photo A]
- Submission 1 : Rejected for underexposed, re-edited
- Submission 2 : Rejected for low contrast, re-edited
- Submission 3 : Rejected for blurry, CW rotation, underexposed
- Submission 4 : Appealed from Submission 3, rejected for blurry, CW rotation, underexposed
- Gave up [Photo A]
- Selected a different picture [Photo B]
[Photo B]
- Submission 5 : Rejected for blurry, low contrast
- Submission 6 : Appealed from Submission 5, rejected for blurry + personal message
Regards,
Akira Uekawa
Re: [Post-Screening] Akira Uekawa JA67NH
The image of the helicopter is good, crisp and clear; not blurry; not low contrast; not underexposed.
The background is blurry because of shallow depth of field and perhaps some camera movement when following the helicopter. I guess this is what they don't like, though it seems to me that should be acceptable. A lot of photos have out of focus backgrounds.
Beautiful action photo.
The background is blurry because of shallow depth of field and perhaps some camera movement when following the helicopter. I guess this is what they don't like, though it seems to me that should be acceptable. A lot of photos have out of focus backgrounds.
Beautiful action photo.
-
- akirauekawa
- Posts: 57
- Joined:
Re: [Post-Screening] Akira Uekawa JA67NH
ricq wrote:The image of the helicopter is good, crisp and clear; not blurry; not low contrast; not underexposed.
The background is blurry because of shallow depth of field and perhaps some camera movement when following the helicopter. I guess this is what they don't like, though it seems to me that should be acceptable. A lot of photos have out of focus backgrounds.
Beautiful action photo.
ricq-san,
Thank you so much for the feedback and good to hear at least the subject seems to be good to you. I totally missed the background blurriness, which seemed acceptable to me just like a panning shot. But it can easily be guessable this isn't acceptable for the database.
Regards,
Akira Uekawa
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests