Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
comet1 wrote:Hi John,
Well, this is quite subjective imo.
So I keep them in my collection. Like I wrote already: Only by a.net have these problems.
LGM wrote:Sometimes I got a lot of accepted photos in sequence, then suddenly I start to get rejections for oversharpened or soft. I swear that I try a lot to find the best sharpening, I use the same editing process, and even so my acceptance is inconsistent. For example:
This one is oversharpened according to the screening process:
https://i.imgur.com/ZV9tipi.jpeg
And this one is soft:
https://i.imgur.com/yW2pCDy.jpeg
On both of them I see some small jagged lines, even in the Cessna, that got a soft rejection, the N number, the stripes... but they're "ok". The borderline of sharpening appears to be too thin.
comet1 wrote:Hi,
I'd like to have your opionions about my recent oversharpened rejections. I do get them quite often by A.net, but never in other dbs.
To me the pics look good. Less sharpened would bo too soft imo.
Pls. check here and give me your personal opinion as detailed as you like.
https://abload.de/img/q33a7021-cr2_dxo_grosvpkyy.jpg
https://abload.de/img/q33a7318-cr2_dxo_gros0bj9z.jpg
https://abload.de/img/q33a7263-1grossfilterg2j83.jpg
Thank you for you effort in advance.
Rainer
ASOSpotter wrote:It would be nice to see some consistency from the screeners on this site. The number of 'over sharpened' rejections by myself and many other photographers seems to be a wide spread issue. As mentioned above images compressed to 1200 px etc will also cause issues. I was also told be a screener today Id be banned if I didn't sharpen an image after a third upload of the same image.
Screeners with some more constructive language rather than blank treats might see you retain people wanting to build the site up. Or people will continue to leave and take their images to other sites like Jetphotos etc.
comet1 wrote:would it be possible to take one pic as example and point out the oversharpened area?