Dear All
I'm a newbie here, so pls disregard any stupid question.
I had the following two images rejected from "High in Frame".
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/9/6/0/6910069.jpg?v=v4b1d1cf4d86
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/7/6/0/6910067.jpg?v=v4850428a3eb
In order to understand why, learn and avoid future similarly situations is there a faq/document that defines "high/low frame" rules ?
thx for your time and help
/rgds
Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
-
- dutchspotter1
- Posts: 532
- Joined:
Re: High in Frame rejecting help
Please find the FAQ here:
https://www.airliners.net/faq/photo_acceptance_guide/#
If you have any questions please feel free to ask at this forum.
https://www.airliners.net/faq/photo_acceptance_guide/#
If you have any questions please feel free to ask at this forum.
Re: High in Frame rejecting help
dutchspotter1 wrote:Please find the FAQ here:
https://www.airliners.net/faq/photo_acceptance_guide/#
If you have any questions please feel free to ask at this forum.
Thx dutchspotter1
Just read the guidelines and I'm a bit confused by the examples, so I need some additional help to understand it.
Let's look at the rejection examples.
the pattern I see is the plane/fuselage envelope is either high or low... ok. fine.
However this photo ( which is acceptable ) has the same pattern of above. So why is it acceptable ?
I'm assuming the idea here is to show the mountain peak.. therefore the high/low isn't considered . Am i correct here ?
Now looking at the other acceptable ones.
In this case , the pattern I see, is that the plane fuselage/body is in the middle of the photo.
The whole plane envelope isn't centered neither the tail take any precedence
I see that the wheels aren't being considered for alignment
Is looks like then the high/low line is then based on the body of the plane.
Looking at the right and left boundaries .. they go pretty much to the edges...
I'm wondering if the same applies to the tail against the top margin... can it go to the same limits ?
Am I correct on my analysis/assumptions ?
Now looking at my rejected photos
they pretty much follow the alignment based on the body of the plane... but since I've take in considerations the wheels for the centring... they look a bit off. ( even so the 747 is also a bit off )
is that the case then ? should it take only the body not including the wheels to find the center ?
Any suggestion/comments/corrections are welcome.
thanks for your time and help
-
-
beaverhunter
Screener
- Posts: 67
- Joined:
Re: High in Frame rejecting help
You should consider the vertical tail when centering the aircraft in the frame. Both examples are very nice photos but much too high in the frame. Try re-cropping both to lower the aircraft in the frame.
Hope this helps
Hope this helps
Re: High in Frame rejecting help
beaverhunter wrote:You should consider the vertical tail when centering the aircraft in the frame. Both examples are very nice photos but much too high in the frame. Try re-cropping both to lower the aircraft in the frame.
Hope this helps
Ok, so let me try then to take the tail in consideration, letting for some free headroom.
Thx for your time and help beaverhunter.
/rgds
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests