Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Quoting corndog69 (Thread starter): The main reason being 'cyan cast visible' |
Quoting viv (Reply 2): I sincerely hope that you do not measure your worth as a photographer by your acceptance ratio here. This site caters for a very narrow segment of the world of photography, with acceptance criteria that are unusual to say the least. |
Quoting corndog69 (Reply 6): I can't see a difference myself |
Quoting corndog69 (Reply 6): I am using Canons |
Quoting dazbo5 (Reply 4): Just a guess, but are you using a Canon DSLR? Canon set their cameras up to have a slight cyan cast as it gives a slight warmth to photos and in general, a better look. This slight cast isn't appreciated here though and needs to be removed and is probably the root of your problem. The way I get around it is to include a slight reduction in the red channel during my workflow. If you use levels as part of your workflow to correct any slight exposure imperfections and contrast, it's a 5 second extra step. Simply open levels, correct the histogram in the RGB channel then change to the red channel and reduce the centre value from 1.0 to 0.96 on a bright day, or 0.97 on a dull day. |
Quoting corndog69 (Thread starter): Having spent thousands of pounds updating my cameras & lenses, I feel it was a total waste of hard earned cash, as my rejection ratio has steadily increased over the past year or so. |
Quoting dazbo5 (Reply 4): Canon set their cameras up to have a slight cyan cast as it gives a slight warmth to photos and in general, a better look. This slight cast isn't appreciated here though and needs to be removed and is probably the root of your problem. The way I get around it is to include a slight reduction in the red channel during my workflow. |