Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 2): Also looks a bit heat hazed, though if could be Flickr compressing the image, if it does that Hi all don't want to hijack this but hopefully add. I've been pondering one I took and wonder the same about Flickr compression? I keep going back to it and thinking it just doesn't seem right compared to others same focal Length/Camera parameters/time/day? Check out the leading edge, cheat line and 'Boeing 777' pls? . |
Quoting Tonyholt777 (Reply 3): don't want to hijack this but hopefully add. |
Quoting monsoon84 (Reply 10): Any help with this photo would be great! |
Quoting angad84 (Reply 11): I could even have a go at editing it for you. |
Quoting angad84 (Reply 11): If you could post the original RAW, I could even have a go at editing it for you. |
Quoting clickhappy (Reply 20): While we are happy to help, you still have to do the uploading |
Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 21): I'd agree with Royal - not too bad, but you'd do better smaller. Still a bit soft. I would probably give it a bit of contrast too, though it may be acceptable as is. |
Quoting angad84 (Reply 22): Although monsoon, if you want, I could screenshot the settings I used in LR4 and you could try and match those in your editing software of choice. |
Quoting monsoon84 (Reply 23): Either way would be fine with me, I'll definitely give you the credit. |
Quoting monsoon84 (Reply 6): |
Quoting monsoon84 (Reply 35): Just had this one rejected for grainy and soft, https://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...723_y1373443221.0223dsc_0288n1.jpg What is the best way the reduce the grain? |
Quoting monsoon84 (Reply 35): What is the best way the reduce the grain? |
Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 36): t is soft, though, and there are a couple of dust spots |
Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 36): It is soft, though, and there are a couple of dust spots behind the winglet that you may want to take care of. |
Quoting Tonyholt777 (Reply 37): Dust spots were very obvious to me so I'd expect the original screener to have mentioned them in the rejection - yes? |
Quoting Tonyholt777 (Reply 37): Dust spots were very obvious to me so I'd expect the original screener to have mentioned them in the rejection - yes? |
Quoting monsoon84 (Reply 38): Wow, I cant believe I missed those. No mention of the dust spots in the rejection info. |