Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR

 
User avatar
kulverstukas
Topic Author
Posts: 1101
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 11:58 am

RE: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Sun Jun 12, 2016 8:59 pm

Quoting angad84 (Reply 83):
If you don't try to get this up - at ANY size - I will be very sad.

OK, I tried...   5 of 5 get rejected today, 10 more to go. I don't think my photos are up to this site latest screeners demand - nothing changes since February.
 
User avatar
kulverstukas
Topic Author
Posts: 1101
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 11:58 am

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Wed Aug 03, 2016 2:08 pm

Image

Rejected for two reasons. What "Left in frame" mean? Also "Soft" which doesn't feels soft for me (if we talking about copter which is the main object, other can be soft however). And I can't get whole idea of HQ 1 from firs screener - and rejection from second.
 
User avatar
airkas1
Posts: 7904
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Thu Aug 04, 2016 1:50 pm

kulverstukas wrote:
What "Left in frame" mean?

It means exactly what it says.. Subject is too left in the frame (not centered).


kulverstukas wrote:
"Soft" which doesn't feels soft for me

It looks passable.
 
User avatar
scbriml
Posts: 21252
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 10:37 pm

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Thu Aug 04, 2016 2:22 pm

airkas1 wrote:
It means exactly what it says.. Subject is too left in the frame (not centered).


So you think he should move it further to the right? ;) :o

I suspect the screener meant it needs to be moved "left in frame"? Personally, I'd crop most of the rotor out - it's adding nothing and makes the shot look unbalanced:
Image
 
User avatar
airkas1
Posts: 7904
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Thu Aug 04, 2016 2:34 pm

Oh, I forgot to mention that I obviously don't agree with Left in Frame. Probably a miss-click by the screener. I agree with Steve's crop.
 
User avatar
kulverstukas
Topic Author
Posts: 1101
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 11:58 am

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Thu Aug 04, 2016 3:27 pm

Hm... I know that left is right and right is wrong but does it apply to aviation pictures? Seriously, Kas, you seems dismissed both rejection reasons, right? In case I still want to frame it the way it is (which technically comply with Anet rules)?
 
User avatar
airkas1
Posts: 7904
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Thu Aug 04, 2016 3:48 pm

kulverstukas wrote:
Hm... I know that left is right and right is wrong but does it apply to aviation pictures? Seriously, Kas, you seems dismissed both rejection reasons, right? In case I still want to frame it the way it is (which technically comply with Anet rules)?

Of course it applies to aviation images. You have to take horizontal centering in account too, not just vertical centering. And I didn't dismiss either rejection. I explained what "left of frame" means and I said the sharpening is passable. If you include the rotor, it would be borderline OK for me, although it does look unbalanced from that angle (which is why Steve's crop looks better).
 
vikkyvik
Posts: 12746
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:58 pm

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Thu Aug 04, 2016 6:20 pm

airkas1 wrote:
kulverstukas wrote:
Hm... I know that left is right and right is wrong but does it apply to aviation pictures? Seriously, Kas, you seems dismissed both rejection reasons, right? In case I still want to frame it the way it is (which technically comply with Anet rules)?

Of course it applies to aviation images. You have to take horizontal centering in account too, not just vertical centering. And I didn't dismiss either rejection. I explained what "left of frame" means and I said the sharpening is passable. If you include the rotor, it would be borderline OK for me, although it does look unbalanced from that angle (which is why Steve's crop looks better).


I thought images didn't get rejected for what looks like an unbalanced crop due to including full helicopter rotors.
 
User avatar
airkas1
Posts: 7904
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Thu Aug 04, 2016 6:27 pm

That's why I said that this crop would be OK for me. I'm pretty sure the left in frame rejection was a mistake.
 
User avatar
kulverstukas
Topic Author
Posts: 1101
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 11:58 am

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Thu Aug 04, 2016 7:41 pm

Appealed it, let's wait outcome. UPD: Accepted. Question: if I upload another shoot with same copter at the same place same day but hoods closed and engine started (first ground test of new modification) will it be rejected as double?

Image

Blurry and OS?
 
User avatar
airkas1
Posts: 7904
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Thu Aug 04, 2016 8:18 pm

kulverstukas wrote:
if I upload another shoot with same copter at the same place same day but hoods closed and engine started (first ground test of new modification) will it be rejected as double?

Yes.


kulverstukas wrote:
Blurry and OS?

Not really OS, but the tail/rotor looks OOF.
 
User avatar
kulverstukas
Topic Author
Posts: 1101
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 11:58 am

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Fri Aug 05, 2016 6:46 pm

kulverstukas wrote:
Appealed it, let's wait outcome.


Top #1 photo of A.net... With 360 views... Shame on this new site!
 
User avatar
kulverstukas
Topic Author
Posts: 1101
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 11:58 am

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Sun Aug 21, 2016 9:08 am

Image
 
User avatar
airkas1
Posts: 7904
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Sun Aug 21, 2016 5:17 pm

Looks soft/bit heathazed.
 
User avatar
kulverstukas
Topic Author
Posts: 1101
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 11:58 am

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Mon Aug 22, 2016 8:52 am

Soft? I just exchanged all my editing gears and has three different screens attached - 17" 1920x1080, 24' 2560x1440 and old one 20" 1600x900 (which I put instead of sole 24" 1920x1200 I used to check how it looks like on non-retinas). All three makes me impression that its closer to OS.
 
User avatar
kulverstukas
Topic Author
Posts: 1101
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 11:58 am

Re: RE: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Mon Aug 22, 2016 8:54 am

angad84 wrote:
Quoting kulverstukas (Reply 78): I think this one don't worth trying even at 1024?
If you don't try to get this up - at ANY size - I will be very sad.

Cheers
A


Managed to get it through a couple of rejections and to PC after a bit hot worded appeal ;)
 
User avatar
airkas1
Posts: 7904
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Mon Aug 22, 2016 9:58 pm

kulverstukas wrote:
Soft? I just exchanged all my editing gears and has three different screens attached - 17" 1920x1080, 24' 2560x1440 and old one 20" 1600x900 (which I put instead of sole 24" 1920x1200 I used to check how it looks like on non-retinas). All three makes me impression that its closer to OS.

Sure, but it still looks soft/heathazed for me.


kulverstukas wrote:
Managed to get it through a couple of rejections and to PC after a bit hot worded appeal ;)

Good to see it finally got in.
 
angad84
Posts: 2151
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 3:04 pm

Re: RE: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Tue Aug 23, 2016 7:11 am

kulverstukas wrote:
angad84 wrote:
Quoting kulverstukas (Reply 78): I think this one don't worth trying even at 1024?
If you don't try to get this up - at ANY size - I will be very sad.

Cheers
A


Managed to get it through a couple of rejections and to PC after a bit hot worded appeal ;)

I saw that -- good man!

Cheers
A
 
User avatar
JohnKrist
Head Support
Posts: 1982
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 11:54 pm

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Tue Aug 23, 2016 6:29 pm

Oh man I envy your spotting location!
 
User avatar
kulverstukas
Topic Author
Posts: 1101
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 11:58 am

Re: RE: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Wed Aug 24, 2016 3:52 pm

angad84 wrote:
kulverstukas wrote:
angad84 wrote:
Quoting kulverstukas (Reply 78): I think this one don't worth trying even at 1024?
If you don't try to get this up - at ANY size - I will be very sad.

Cheers
A


Managed to get it through a couple of rejections and to PC after a bit hot worded appeal ;)

I saw that -- good man!

Cheers
A


So hope you will not be saad, man? ;)
 
angad84
Posts: 2151
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 3:04 pm

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Wed Aug 24, 2016 6:05 pm

Haha, absolutely not!

Cheers
A
 
User avatar
kulverstukas
Topic Author
Posts: 1101
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 11:58 am

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Sat Aug 27, 2016 10:02 pm

Image

Image
 
angad84
Posts: 2151
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 3:04 pm

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Sat Aug 27, 2016 10:51 pm

The An-2 is a bit backlit, but the cool factor might make up for it ;)

The Il-14 is good.
 
User avatar
kulverstukas
Topic Author
Posts: 1101
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 11:58 am

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Sun Aug 28, 2016 2:51 pm

Image
 
User avatar
airkas1
Posts: 7904
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Sun Aug 28, 2016 4:27 pm

Il-14: looks good to me.
An-2: dark due to backlit. Otherwise ok for me.
L-39: blurry nose and aft fuselage.
 
User avatar
kulverstukas
Topic Author
Posts: 1101
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 11:58 am

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Tue Aug 30, 2016 8:19 pm

Image
 
User avatar
airkas1
Posts: 7904
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Tue Aug 30, 2016 8:37 pm

That's quite an angle of attack. Looks passable to me.
 
User avatar
kulverstukas
Topic Author
Posts: 1101
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 11:58 am

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Sat Sep 03, 2016 4:34 pm

Image

As part of it is OOF I think it's no go for A.net?
 
User avatar
airkas1
Posts: 7904
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Mon Sep 05, 2016 8:31 pm

You are correct.
 
User avatar
kulverstukas
Topic Author
Posts: 1101
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 11:58 am

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Tue Sep 06, 2016 10:30 am

What level of tolerance then for DOF in such conditions for A.net?
 
User avatar
airkas1
Posts: 7904
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Tue Sep 06, 2016 10:45 am

Well, perhaps don't include the side of the entrance in the frame. One way to achieve that would be getting closer, although that would also involve using a wider zoom.
 
User avatar
kulverstukas
Topic Author
Posts: 1101
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 11:58 am

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Tue Sep 06, 2016 11:47 am

Ok, let's look into another cockpit:

Image

or

Image

still part of picture will be OOF because of DOF

and here we go with 12mm - still...

Image
 
angad84
Posts: 2151
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 3:04 pm

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Tue Sep 06, 2016 6:59 pm

I've seen worse OOF issues in cockpit shots accepted here, but it's really subjective from one screener to another. What aperture were these shot at?

Cheers
A
 
User avatar
kulverstukas
Topic Author
Posts: 1101
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 11:58 am

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Tue Sep 06, 2016 8:03 pm

An-22 @ F8
Il-76 @ F4,5
An-12 @ F8
Il-14 @ F6,3
 
User avatar
kulverstukas
Topic Author
Posts: 1101
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 11:58 am

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Sat Sep 10, 2016 4:38 pm

airkas1 wrote:
That's quite an angle of attack. Looks passable to me.


Heh, rejected for OS and empowered with blurry after appeal. And as HS see blurriness in it it's for trash can then because blurriness in contrary to softness can't be cured, right?

angad84 wrote:
The An-2 is a bit backlit, but the cool factor might make up for it ;)


Rejected for dark and doesn't pass appeal too. So as i understand it's not A.net worthy as I think it can't be pushed "brighter" any more that I done already.
 
User avatar
airkas1
Posts: 7904
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Sat Sep 10, 2016 7:23 pm

Usually blurryness can't be fixed. But sometimes going to a smaller size will help 'hide' blurryness (as in it being less apparent).
 
User avatar
kulverstukas
Topic Author
Posts: 1101
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 11:58 am

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Sat Sep 10, 2016 8:03 pm

airkas1 wrote:
Usually blurryness can't be fixed. But sometimes going to a smaller size will help 'hide' blurryness (as in it being less apparent).


Problem is I can't see any blurriness in this and couple other rejected today. Soft parts - possibly. But not blurry.
 
User avatar
airkas1
Posts: 7904
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Sun Sep 11, 2016 9:41 am

I'm not on my screening computer at the moment, so I'll check back later this week to offer an opinion.
 
User avatar
kulverstukas
Topic Author
Posts: 1101
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 11:58 am

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Sun Sep 11, 2016 10:59 am

airkas1 wrote:
I'm not on my screening computer at the moment, so I'll check back later this week to offer an opinion.


Thanks. BTW, what is your screening installation? I changed my old TN set of notebook + monitor (Samsung X360 13"TN 1280x800 + Samsung SyncMaster 2443NW 24"TN 1920x1200) for new IPS one (Ideapad Z710 17"IPS 1920x1080 + Dell P2416D 24"IPS 2560x1440 + Acer V203h 20"TN 1600x900) with much dense dpi/ppi. I connect Acer with it's loose ppi specially to recheck sharpness on "non-retina" screens. But judging from my constant decline of acceptance ratio, it doesn't helps :(
 
User avatar
airkas1
Posts: 7904
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Fri Sep 16, 2016 10:16 pm

kulverstukas wrote:
Thanks. BTW, what is your screening installation?

My screening monitor is an iiyama Pro Lite XB2483SHU.
 
User avatar
kulverstukas
Topic Author
Posts: 1101
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 11:58 am

Re: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Fri Sep 16, 2016 11:11 pm

airkas1 wrote:
kulverstukas wrote:
Thanks. BTW, what is your screening installation?

My screening monitor is an iiyama Pro Lite XB2483SHU.


It's exactly same dpi/ppi as my Acer V203h

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: WZYAFX and 4 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos