Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
CWizard wrote:Can't say I've seen an Airbus A-300F with a taillight.
timz wrote:CWizard wrote:Can't say I've seen an Airbus A-300F with a taillight.
But if no centerline tail-light, and no rear-facing lights at the ends of the tailplane like a 747, then it has to have rear-facing white lights on the wings?
Starlionblue wrote:
AFAIK the regulators don't care as long a steady white light is visible in an arc 60 degrees each side of straight back for a total of 120 degrees arc.
StereoTechque wrote:Starlionblue wrote:
AFAIK the regulators don't care as long a steady white light is visible in an arc 60 degrees each side of straight back for a total of 120 degrees arc.
It is 70 degrees either side with a total arc of 140 degrees for the Nav white light.
LH707330 wrote:^I think you're right, given the many configurations. I personally like the three-bulb 777/787/748 one the best, it tells you how far away the plane is and what its pitch angle is relative to your line of sight to it. Single-bulbs like on most Airbii are useless for ranging.
LH707330 wrote:^I think you're right, given the many configurations. I personally like the three-bulb 777/787/748 one the best, it tells you how far away the plane is and what its pitch angle is relative to your line of sight to it. Single-bulbs like on most Airbii are useless for ranging.
timz wrote:CWizard wrote:Can't say I've seen an Airbus A-300F with a taillight.
But if no centerline tail-light, and no rear-facing lights at the ends of the tailplane like a 747, then it has to have rear-facing white lights on the wings?
Natflyer wrote:LH707330 wrote:^I think you're right, given the many configurations. I personally like the three-bulb 777/787/748 one the best, it tells you how far away the plane is and what its pitch angle is relative to your line of sight to it. Single-bulbs like on most Airbii are useless for ranging.
Scary. Use your TCAS or ask ATC.
Why not brake lights? Would be useful in the Conga line at JFK et al.....