LMFNINJA
Topic Author
Posts: 102
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2017 5:11 pm

Level Strands Passengers in Montreal

Wed Jul 18, 2018 6:34 pm

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal ... -1.4749443

Apparently hundreds of passengers are stranded at Montreal's Trudeau airport.

Not good publicity for Willie Walsh and IAG.

Funny thing is that I was going to take one of their flight to Orly for a cheap holiday in Paris. Not anymore!
Last edited by SQ22 on Wed Jul 18, 2018 6:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Typo fixed
 
Skywatcher
Posts: 803
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2002 11:19 am

Re: Level Strands Passengers in Montreal

Wed Jul 18, 2018 9:05 pm

It's been on the local YUL news-800 people from 2 cancelled flights (Sun/Tue I believe it was). Apparently Level did nothing to rebook anybody. All passengers were basically abandoned. Cheapo flights on an airline with only 2 Orly based A-330 aircraft is not a good bet.
 
Thibault973
Posts: 234
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2015 9:11 am

Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Thu Jul 26, 2018 2:14 pm

So it seems like Level's ORY launch is not going as smoothly as they hoped for.

https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/800-low-cost-airline-passengers-stranded-in-montreal-for-4-days-1.4017250

In fact, 800+ passengers were left stranded for several days in YUL after they had to cancel 2 back to back flights due to operational issues. Apparently, they rebooked the passengers on the next available flight but considering they only flight 3 times weekly and that virtually all their flights were sold out chaos ensued.

In my opinion, this was bound to happen sooner than later since they planned to operate 4 weekly ORY-PTP and 3 ORY-YUL with only one plane in service.

What do you guys think ?
 
Aircellist
Posts: 1527
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 8:43 am

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Thu Jul 26, 2018 2:23 pm

Glad I did not book on them.
"When I find out I was wrong, I change my mind. What do you do?" -attributed to John Maynard Keynes
 
User avatar
Aisak
Posts: 867
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 10:56 pm

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Thu Jul 26, 2018 3:16 pm

gatibosgru wrote:
Why not route pax through BA/IB/EI?


Why not keep at least 1 757 which is perfectly capable of flying YUL-ORY in case of IrOps.....

At least until you can grow up the base
 
User avatar
Aisak
Posts: 867
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 10:56 pm

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Thu Jul 26, 2018 3:56 pm

max999 wrote:
gatibosgru wrote:
Why not route pax through BA/IB/EI?


I guess IAG wants to draw a very clear line in the sand between Level and the rest of the company. To keep everything as cheap as possible at Level, IAG must have decided that Level cannot call for support from its higher cost sister airline like BA, even during a crisis situation.


That's good and typical Ryanair move: I'll get you there as soon as I (and only me) can.

But as a french airline, they are subject to EC261 compensations... That's no cheap.
 
max999
Posts: 1131
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 11:05 am

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Thu Jul 26, 2018 4:03 pm

gatibosgru wrote:
Why not route pax through BA/IB/EI?


I guess IAG wants to draw a very clear line in the sand between Level and the rest of the company. To keep Level's operations as cheap as possible, IAG must have decided that Level cannot call for support from its higher cost sister airline like BA, even during a crisis situation.
Last edited by max999 on Thu Jul 26, 2018 4:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
All the things I really like to do are either immoral, illegal, or fattening.
 
oldannyboy
Posts: 2381
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2016 8:28 am

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Fri Jul 27, 2018 11:09 am

That is bad.

I have flown LEVEL twice (two return trips) and found them to be very good. Crisp, immaculate cabins, lovely professional crews and on-time.
 
smi0006
Posts: 2300
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 7:45 am

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Fri Jul 27, 2018 11:19 am

This is the reality of an LCC, the cost savings, aren’t really in your meal, or IFE- but in disrupt management, back of house support, and labour.

Sorry to say but so long as it’s legal & safe- you get what you pay for.
 
LHRFlyer
Posts: 1020
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:50 pm

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Fri Jul 27, 2018 12:20 pm

Isn’t LEVEL part of the AA/AY/BA/IB joint-venture by virtue of the fact their flights are operated by Iberia and the old OpenSkies AOC?

If so, there’s no excuse for not reaccommodating passengers on AA and BA.
 
APYu
Posts: 478
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 10:23 pm

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Fri Jul 27, 2018 12:44 pm

Rebooking on the next available service should mean other airlines are used IF there are no other flights by that carrier on that day. EZY lost a case on this last year when they told passengers travelling BRS to VCE that they had to wait a couple of days for their next service. The court ruled that next available service should not be limited to their own.
We'd like to welcome in particular our Executive Club members and those joining us from our Oneworld alliance partners.
 
User avatar
OA940
Posts: 1909
Joined: Fri May 20, 2016 6:18 am

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Fri Jul 27, 2018 12:46 pm

smi0006 wrote:
This is the reality of an LCC, the cost savings, aren’t really in your meal, or IFE- but in disrupt management, back of house support, and labour.

Sorry to say but so long as it’s legal & safe- you get what you pay for.


Or mayyyyyyyyyyyyybe, just maybe, they just started flying from a new base and daddy IAG wants them to replace another service which can cause quite a bit of confusion. Let's not blame everything on the ticket prices, shall we?
A350/CSeries = bae
 
User avatar
yyz717
Posts: 15771
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 12:26 pm

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Fri Jul 27, 2018 4:37 pm

max999 wrote:
gatibosgru wrote:
Why not route pax through BA/IB/EI?


I guess IAG wants to draw a very clear line in the sand between Level and the rest of the company. To keep Level's operations as cheap as possible, IAG must have decided that Level cannot call for support from its higher cost sister airline like BA, even during a crisis situation.


It seems that way. It keeps the mainline/ULCC operations separate and the cost accounting separate and clean. it also incents the low cost Level to learn to recover ASAP on their own. Sounds like good discipline to me.

Passengers stranded by an LCC/ULCC operation is hardly a crisis, or even an event worth reporting on really. You get what you pay for. Any of the 800 pax who are upset can book BA or IB next time, risk Level again, or not travel -- the choice is theirs.
I dumped at the gybe mark in strong winds when I looked up at a Porter Q400 on finals. Can't stop spotting.
 
User avatar
ro1960
Posts: 1161
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 8:19 am

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Fri Jul 27, 2018 5:44 pm

VY which offers a decent service for the price is just as bad when disruption occurs. LCC's model relies on tight operation. One little thing goes wrong, it's chaos and poorly handled by staff not trained for such situations.

"Only" 800 people were affected directly. Nobody else will really know except anetters. Business will start again as usual. The ticket price is what matters.
You may like my airport photos:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/aeroports
 
tootallsd
Posts: 493
Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2006 11:02 pm

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Fri Jul 27, 2018 6:45 pm

I'm still trying to figure out how they are getting 800 passengers into two airplanes.
 
strfyr51
Posts: 3931
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:04 pm

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Fri Jul 27, 2018 7:32 pm

Thibault973 wrote:
So it seems like Level's ORY launch is not going as smoothly as they hoped for.

https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/800-low-cost-airline-passengers-stranded-in-montreal-for-4-days-1.4017250

In fact, 800+ passengers were left stranded for several days in YUL after they had to cancel 2 back to back flights due to operational issues. Apparently, they rebooked the passengers on the next available flight but considering they only flight 3 times weekly and that virtually all their flights were sold out chaos ensued.

In my opinion, this was bound to happen sooner than later since they planned to operate 4 weekly ORY-PTP and 3 ORY-YUL with only one plane in service.

What do you guys think ?

And they couldn't sub service? I worked for a single plane Charter outfit. It was fine most of the time but every now and then? It was chaos. And those were Charters.
Regular revenue service? Unthinkable. It's always some Newbie in the business that thinks airplanes are never going to break down or take delays.
 
Flighty
Posts: 9963
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 3:07 am

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Fri Jul 27, 2018 7:56 pm

Count me for saying a one plane operation with no recovery plan is totally irresponsible and unprofessional. It reflects directly on IAG management.

A crisis is something that blows up on social media and destroys your brand forever. It costs hundreds of millions to fix a damaged brand.
 
jetwet1
Posts: 2914
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 4:42 am

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Fri Jul 27, 2018 9:46 pm

600 Euros per person plus food and drink and hotel rooms, that's going to end up being a million euro hiccup.
 
User avatar
spinkid
Posts: 1874
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2001 5:59 am

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Fri Jul 27, 2018 11:52 pm

Flighty wrote:
Count me for saying a one plane operation with no recovery plan is totally irresponsible and unprofessional. It reflects directly on IAG management.

A crisis is something that blows up on social media and destroys your brand forever. It costs hundreds of millions to fix a damaged brand.


Agreed. I'm not sure why they haven't called up Hi Fly, or someone similar to help them clean this up.
 
smi0006
Posts: 2300
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 7:45 am

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Sat Jul 28, 2018 6:01 am

Flighty wrote:
Count me for saying a one plane operation with no recovery plan is totally irresponsible and unprofessional. It reflects directly on IAG management.

A crisis is something that blows up on social media and destroys your brand forever. It costs hundreds of millions to fix a damaged brand.


But it also costs hundreds of millions to have slack in your fleet, to have disrupt management training for staff, to hire sufficnelty experienced staff, to have reciprocal agreements with other carriers, retail outlets, and hotel providers to have a disrupt management team in place, IT and resvervations tools. All these things only inflate a cost base- it’s a risk LCCs have proven time and time again they are willing to take, and the general public will mostly forget the brand damage. Planning is all good and we’ll, tools and resources cost money that the traditional LCC model can’t afford on their margins.
 
mxaxai
Posts: 1153
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2016 7:29 am

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Sat Jul 28, 2018 6:24 am

smi0006 wrote:
Flighty wrote:
Count me for saying a one plane operation with no recovery plan is totally irresponsible and unprofessional. It reflects directly on IAG management.

A crisis is something that blows up on social media and destroys your brand forever. It costs hundreds of millions to fix a damaged brand.


But it also costs hundreds of millions to have slack in your fleet, to have disrupt management training for staff, to hire sufficnelty experienced staff, to have reciprocal agreements with other carriers, retail outlets, and hotel providers to have a disrupt management team in place, IT and resvervations tools. All these things only inflate a cost base- it’s a risk LCCs have proven time and time again they are willing to take, and the general public will mostly forget the brand damage. Planning is all good and we’ll, tools and resources cost money that the traditional LCC model can’t afford on their margins.

Calling HiFly (or any other similar operator) for one or two return flights would cost a lot less than hundreds of millions. Probably even less than a million.

However, since this "crisis" hasn't found its way into mainstream media yet, or has stayed rather low-profile, I guess Level's decision was the correct one.
 
smi0006
Posts: 2300
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 7:45 am

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Sat Jul 28, 2018 6:56 am

mxaxai wrote:
smi0006 wrote:
Flighty wrote:
Count me for saying a one plane operation with no recovery plan is totally irresponsible and unprofessional. It reflects directly on IAG management.

A crisis is something that blows up on social media and destroys your brand forever. It costs hundreds of millions to fix a damaged brand.


But it also costs hundreds of millions to have slack in your fleet, to have disrupt management training for staff, to hire sufficnelty experienced staff, to have reciprocal agreements with other carriers, retail outlets, and hotel providers to have a disrupt management team in place, IT and resvervations tools. All these things only inflate a cost base- it’s a risk LCCs have proven time and time again they are willing to take, and the general public will mostly forget the brand damage. Planning is all good and we’ll, tools and resources cost money that the traditional LCC model can’t afford on their margins.

Calling HiFly (or any other similar operator) for one or two return flights would cost a lot less than hundreds of millions. Probably even less than a million.

However, since this "crisis" hasn't found its way into mainstream media yet, or has stayed rather low-profile, I guess Level's decision was the correct one.


Is there much charter capacity available atm with all the 787 issues? Like all companies charter companies try to ensure their utilisation is high, their capacity is also booked out during peak periods. I don’t know about in the EU, but in AU/NZ charter work requires weeks of regulatory approval and oversight. It’s not as simple as calling them up and the aircraft turns up. Could be different in Europe though with fellow EU operators.
 
mxaxai
Posts: 1153
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2016 7:29 am

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Sat Jul 28, 2018 7:05 am

smi0006 wrote:
mxaxai wrote:
smi0006 wrote:

But it also costs hundreds of millions to have slack in your fleet, to have disrupt management training for staff, to hire sufficnelty experienced staff, to have reciprocal agreements with other carriers, retail outlets, and hotel providers to have a disrupt management team in place, IT and resvervations tools. All these things only inflate a cost base- it’s a risk LCCs have proven time and time again they are willing to take, and the general public will mostly forget the brand damage. Planning is all good and we’ll, tools and resources cost money that the traditional LCC model can’t afford on their margins.

Calling HiFly (or any other similar operator) for one or two return flights would cost a lot less than hundreds of millions. Probably even less than a million.

However, since this "crisis" hasn't found its way into mainstream media yet, or has stayed rather low-profile, I guess Level's decision was the correct one.


Is there much charter capacity available atm with all the 787 issues? Like all companies charter companies try to ensure their utilisation is high, their capacity is also booked out during peak periods. I don’t know about in the EU, but in AU/NZ charter work requires weeks of regulatory approval and oversight. It’s not as simple as calling them up and the aircraft turns up. Could be different in Europe though with fellow EU operators.

BA has been very fast to arrange deals with Titan during strikes. I guess it all comes down to how much you're willing to pay.
 
richcandy
Posts: 715
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2001 4:49 pm

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Sat Jul 28, 2018 8:11 am

Doesn't this sort of thing happen with lots of airlines? I mean not just the LCC.
Its good when the airlines charter an aircraft from Titan etc to get people home, but they don't always do this. Often the pax from the cancelled flight just have be rebooked on what ever availability there is. And in summer that can be a problem.
 
User avatar
JannEejit
Posts: 1345
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2016 4:04 pm

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Sat Jul 28, 2018 11:19 am

tootallsd wrote:
I'm still trying to figure out how they are getting 800 passengers into two airplanes.


Especially when the original article says 100 passengers were stranded at YUL. Did the rest make their own arrangements to fly home ? The article also states that the young Hungarian lady has been staying in a hotel whilst waiting for Level to sort out her flight to Paris ? Who's paying for that ? Would she be better just booking an alternative flight home or hoping that Level will pay for her accommodation and return home eventually ? She says she needs to be back at work, is she willing to hang around Montreal awaiting an outcome and risk losing her job ? I'm not defending Level here but it reads a bit like 'victim' story.
 
a350lover
Posts: 725
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2017 11:21 am

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Sat Jul 28, 2018 1:54 pm

Very bad publicity indeed.

One of the benefits that has the LEVEL operation in Spain (out of BCN) is the fact that in case any eventualities happen, they can use Iberia’s fleet and crews so that they can sort it out.

Ideally, they could do the same in Paris. Otherwise, they should have some back-up plan.
 
george77300
Posts: 1112
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 8:33 pm

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Sat Jul 28, 2018 2:00 pm

JannEejit wrote:
tootallsd wrote:
I'm still trying to figure out how they are getting 800 passengers into two airplanes.


Especially when the original article says 100 passengers were stranded at YUL. Did the rest make their own arrangements to fly home ? The article also states that the young Hungarian lady has been staying in a hotel whilst waiting for Level to sort out her flight to Paris ? Who's paying for that ? Would she be better just booking an alternative flight home or hoping that Level will pay for her accommodation and return home eventually ? She says she needs to be back at work, is she willing to hang around Montreal awaiting an outcome and risk losing her job ? I'm not defending Level here but it reads a bit like 'victim' story.



Well the 800 passengers probably includes both ways even if ambiguous in article. Basically there are people stuck in YUL wanting to be in Paris and also half are probably stuck in ORY wanting to be back home in Canada. 2 round trips is 4 flights so makes sense. Around 200 per flight.
 
LJ
Posts: 4852
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 1999 8:28 pm

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Sat Jul 28, 2018 2:42 pm

smi0006 wrote:
Flighty wrote:
Count me for saying a one plane operation with no recovery plan is totally irresponsible and unprofessional. It reflects directly on IAG management.

A crisis is something that blows up on social media and destroys your brand forever. It costs hundreds of millions to fix a damaged brand.


But it also costs hundreds of millions to have slack in your fleet, to have disrupt management training for staff, to hire sufficnelty experienced staff, to have reciprocal agreements with other carriers, retail outlets, and hotel providers to have a disrupt management team in place, IT and resvervations tools. All these things only inflate a cost base- it’s a risk LCCs have proven time and time again they are willing to take, and the general public will mostly forget the brand damage. Planning is all good and we’ll, tools and resources cost money that the traditional LCC model can’t afford on their margins.


They already need to pay EUR 480,000 in compensation (though probably not all will request compensation because they don't know they're eligible. If you add rebooking (let's say EUR 500 one way), you can add another EUR 400,000) If you're an EU airline you better have a back-up plan as EU 261 is a very good insurance for those travelling on an EU airline (or from the EU).

APYu wrote:
Rebooking on the next available service should mean other airlines are used IF there are no other flights by that carrier on that day. EZY lost a case on this last year when they told passengers travelling BRS to VCE that they had to wait a couple of days for their next service. The court ruled that next available service should not be limited to their own.


Indeed, however, not many know this. A good lawyer will get more than the EUR 600 in mandatory compesation from this event.
 
User avatar
JannEejit
Posts: 1345
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2016 4:04 pm

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Sat Jul 28, 2018 4:29 pm

george77300 wrote:
JannEejit wrote:
tootallsd wrote:
I'm still trying to figure out how they are getting 800 passengers into two airplanes.


Especially when the original article says 100 passengers were stranded at YUL. Did the rest make their own arrangements to fly home ? The article also states that the young Hungarian lady has been staying in a hotel whilst waiting for Level to sort out her flight to Paris ? Who's paying for that ? Would she be better just booking an alternative flight home or hoping that Level will pay for her accommodation and return home eventually ? She says she needs to be back at work, is she willing to hang around Montreal awaiting an outcome and risk losing her job ? I'm not defending Level here but it reads a bit like 'victim' story.



Well the 800 passengers probably includes both ways even if ambiguous in article. Basically there are people stuck in YUL wanting to be in Paris and also half are probably stuck in ORY wanting to be back home in Canada. 2 round trips is 4 flights so makes sense. Around 200 per flight.



Well if you put it like that ... :bigthumbsup:
 
mjoelnir
Posts: 8508
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 11:06 pm

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Sat Jul 28, 2018 4:56 pm

For me the main lesson is, you are not better set with an LCC that is owned by a big airline, than any other LCC. I remember when Norwegian had similar troubles and the vitriol than expended. Strange this quite acceptance of Level letting down its passengers.
 
Begues
Posts: 88
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2017 2:43 pm

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Sat Jul 28, 2018 5:25 pm

smi0006 wrote:
This is the reality of an LCC, the cost savings, aren’t really in your meal, or IFE- but in disrupt management, back of house support, and labour.

Sorry to say but so long as it’s legal & safe- you get what you pay for.


The real issue is that LLCs don't have reserve planes in stand by in case off a plane breakdown. 25 years ago when I worked for a smaller flag carrier airline (some 100 planes or so in total), I was astound to realise they had 2-3 reserve planes waiting in the hangar in case a plane would break down. Across the hubs this would total up to 7 or 8 reserve planes in total out of a fleet around 100 planes. They never ever had passengers waiting more than the 15 min it would take to tow the reserve plane from the hangar. And in the case of a breakdown in some other country, they would simply fly in a reserve plane, so you would never have to wait more than the time it would take to fly in the reserve plane. And of cause, airlines back then always booked you in a 4 star hotel if you had to spend the night in the airport, even traveling in tourist class.

Of cause, back then you also paid 4-5 times more for a ticket, tourist was more exspensive back then than business is today.
 
slcdeltarumd11
Posts: 4383
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 7:30 am

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Sat Jul 28, 2018 5:28 pm

When you operate fully flights it's basically impossible to reaccomodate passengers when you cancel a whole flight. This is not limited to level it's a 2018 problem for most airlines.

I had a similar situation out of btv on AA they cancelled a fully full CR9 to CLT and Initially said they would not book on other airlines problem was all AA flights was basically full for like a week , people went crazy as pretty much every other airline had seats that day. The agents annoyingly were trying to rebook people for like a week away insitng they just stay on AA. Didn't stay to see how it ended there is bad customer service with cancellations everywhere it's not limited to level
 
geoshina
Posts: 213
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2014 8:18 pm

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Sat Jul 28, 2018 6:12 pm

tootallsd wrote:
I'm still trying to figure out how they are getting 800 passengers into two airplanes.


They should hire the Hi Fly A380 to take these people to ORY. :)
 
User avatar
aemoreira1981
Posts: 2883
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2017 12:17 am

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Sat Jul 28, 2018 6:25 pm

Two other things to note:

1. One should always buy travel insurance, especially when booking with a non-IATA operator.
2. Why not configure the existing B763 in a Y273 configuration? (It’s limited to 276 passengers). That could be a LEVEL standby plane until it’s time for the next heavy check in 2020.
 
Aliqiout
Posts: 291
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2016 6:10 pm

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Sat Jul 28, 2018 7:58 pm

richcandy wrote:
Doesn't this sort of thing happen with lots of airlines? I mean not just the LCC.
Its good when the airlines charter an aircraft from Titan etc to get people home, but they don't always do this. Often the pax from the cancelled flight just have be rebooked on what ever availability there is. And in summer that can be a problem.

You certainly can get screwed on any airline, but non LCC have other options so it rarely gets to the point where 800 people are stranded for days. Generally, a non LCC will only get to that point when there is some sort of disaster (historical weather event, terrorism, Icleandic volcanoes, exct..).
 
User avatar
spinkid
Posts: 1874
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2001 5:59 am

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Sat Jul 28, 2018 10:06 pm

This happened about about 10 days ago. Does anyone know how Level ended up clearing out this backlog? Sounds like everyone just waited or bought new tickets on another carrier.
 
BA174
Posts: 318
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 10:55 pm

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Sat Jul 28, 2018 10:07 pm

aemoreira1981 wrote:
Two other things to note:

1. One should always buy travel insurance, especially when booking with a non-IATA operator.
2. Why not configure the existing B763 in a Y273 configuration? (It’s limited to 276 passengers). That could be a LEVEL standby plane until it’s time for the next heavy check in 2020.


1. Correct, especially with a low cost airline that’s just started operations with limited resources.
2. The 763 is 28 years old and the only BA long haul 767 still flying, it’s not changed internally since it’s LHR days and I would imagine reconfiguring costs and keeping an oddball frame until 2020 when the rest of LEVEL is flying A330s is probably cost prohibited and not required. I presume G-BNWI/F-HILU will be following it’s sisters to St Athan or Victorville in the not too distant future. I notice none of the OpenSkies 757s seem to be active in the fleet anymore.
 
AIR MALTA
Posts: 1781
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2001 6:45 am

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Sat Jul 28, 2018 11:24 pm

The Canadian Authority for Transportation has issued some guidance to LEVEL stranded passengers and encouraged them to sue the airline if they couldn‘t reach their representatives. They have provided a link for the complaints.

https://twitter.com/otc_gc/status/1019620451885244416?s=21

Well done I have to say. IAG need all the battering they can get. They have become a pile of rubbish airlines.
Next flights : BRU-ZRH-CAI (LX)/ BRU-FCO-TLV (AZ)
 
User avatar
B727skyguy
Posts: 159
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 8:23 am

Re: Level's operational issues left 800 passengers stranded in YUL

Sun Jul 29, 2018 12:39 am

According to the Level website, all Level flights are operated by either Iberia or OpenSkies. The website states that the operating carrier's conditions of carriage apply.

I assume that the cancelled flights were operated by OpenSkies. Here is what their conditions of carriage say for cancellations and delays:

9.2 Remedies for delays and cancellations

(a) The Carrier may decide, in particular to avoid the cancellation of or delay to a flight, to carry the Passenger on a different flight operated by another aircraft, and/or by another airline.

Source: https://www.flylevel.com/en/about-us/co ... f-carriage

Why are they not protecting on other carriers? They have a legal obligation to do so based on their conditions of carriage. At the very least, they could easily protect on BA. That would keep the revenue in-house.

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos