n75jyv
Topic Author
Posts: 38
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2013 10:36 pm

New TTN Terminal Proposal

Thu Feb 07, 2019 12:44 am

Searched and didn't find this posted yet.

Trenton-Mercer Airport (TTN) is moving forward with planning for a much needed, new terminal building. A public meeting was held on January 23rd, 2019, at which the consulting firm presented preliminary environmental impact and new terminal characteristics and siting proposals. The recommendation is that the new terminal (one of four possible designs) will be located in the west quadrant, adjacent to the current terminal, and will require moving the ARFF station (to the east quadrant adjacent to the ANG hanger).

This is a much needed update to the airport. I live a few miles from TTN (and love the noise reduction that the Frontier A20N have brought). Having flown from TTN on both EastWind (in the 90's) and Frontier (last year), the present terminal is a hack. Looks like the new terminal will have jet bridges... certainly hope they do, along with a real baggage claim!

The presentation is available at: https://www.ttnterminal.com/
 
Nicknuzzii
Posts: 251
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2018 5:57 pm

Re: New TTN Terminal Proposal

Thu Feb 07, 2019 1:29 am

While I think the most unrealistic, I think proposal 3 is the best option. It will give the most room for future expansion.
 
pbodyphoto
Posts: 21
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2017 11:00 am

Re: New TTN Terminal Proposal

Thu Feb 07, 2019 3:23 am

Why? Basically no airlines fly to TTN and no one ever will.
 
Bigant0408
Posts: 338
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2018 2:26 am

Re: New TTN Terminal Proposal

Thu Feb 07, 2019 5:36 am

I agree that 3 would be the best option for terminal. The forest and wetlands wouldn’t be affected as much. Flew out of TTN once in 2017 and that terminal is horrible couldn’t even sit the place was so small and packed
The man who sleeps on the floor doesn’t fall out of bed
 
jeffh747
Posts: 844
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 6:32 pm

Re: New TTN Terminal Proposal

Thu Feb 07, 2019 5:38 pm

pbodyphoto wrote:
Why? Basically no airlines fly to TTN and no one ever will.

Frontier Airlines has a pretty decently sized crew base and focus city there. It’s highly preferable over ACY/PHL for those in South/Central Jersey and Eastern PA because of how easy it is to use and it’s location (being right off of 295). Even some people from North Jersey take the drive down there to catch cheaper flights as opposed to out of EWR. Plus those Jersey to Florida flights, especially in the winter more often than not go out full. If Frontier is having no issues filling up the planes and if the demand is there, then why not?
A318 A319 A320 A320neo A321 A321neo A332 A333 B717 B727 B734 B73G B738 B739 B752 B762 B763 B772 B788 CRJ2 DHC6 DHC8-300 E145 E190 MD82 MD83 MD90 SF340B
 
ScottB
Posts: 6687
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2000 1:25 am

Re: New TTN Terminal Proposal

Thu Feb 07, 2019 6:13 pm

jeffh747 wrote:
If Frontier is having no issues filling up the planes and if the demand is there, then why not?


Present performance is no guarantee of future results. If Frontier decides that TTN isn't making enough money for them and they'd rather consolidate at PHL, who ends up getting stuck with the cost of an empty terminal?
 
PSAatSAN4Ever
Posts: 917
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2018 5:38 pm

Re: New TTN Terminal Proposal

Thu Feb 07, 2019 6:30 pm

Ooooh, teacher, please, I know the timeline!!

1) A group of "concerned citizens" will gather and create a new organization: Citizens for Responsible Airport Planning (CRAP). They will band together to stop the apocalypse...err, excuse me, "ensure that any building that goes on at TTN satisfies local demands for efficiency and quiet".

Translation: oppose everything that would allow even ONE extra passenger to use the airport.

2) CRAP will then find an ambulance-chaser on contingency to sue anyone and everyone who has any stake in the airport, because "none of the designs will be good enough".

Translation: kill any and all attempts by filibustering the issue endlessly.

3) The media will come on board, hoping to "present both sides of the issue".

Translation: the airport side will calmly and rationally explain a) why it is needed, b), how the plan will be paid for, and c) what it will mean for the community. CRAP will bring a large number of hysterical residents from literally the entire east coast, claiming that, "airplane noise hurts our children!" and "I moved near a major city to get away from everyone - this will just bring in more people!!", and the ever-popular, "won't somebody PLEASE think of the children?"

4) A major compromise might be reached - and I stress "might" - when CRAP and the airport agree that the tiniest fraction of expansion can go ahead (drastically scaled down from original plans, and completely insufficient for today, much less anything in the future), but then CRAP receives, in perpetuity, total and complete veto power over ANY expansion or improvements to the airport forever.

Am I being facetious? No. Think BUR. Think SNA. Think LGB. Think LAX. Think DEN, where people in the immediate vicinity are required to sign a waiver understanding that DEN is not going away or closing down just because you bought a house nearby. Think the northeast U.S. where you can't even redesign the airspace without Mr. & Mrs. Suburbia thirty miles away threatening to sue because planes might be down to 15,000 feet near their house.

I hope it is different for Trenton, but NIMBY-ism will probably wipe that airport out of existence.
 
Nicknuzzii
Posts: 251
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2018 5:57 pm

Re: New TTN Terminal Proposal

Thu Feb 07, 2019 10:11 pm

Frontiers loads looked pretty good over the summer (Nearly all above 90%, around half above 95%), hopefully they can continue throughout next year. Anyone have any ideas of some future routes that would be added?
 
harleydriver
Posts: 89
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 1:09 pm

Re: New TTN Terminal Proposal

Fri Feb 08, 2019 4:05 am

I used Frontier a few times when I lived in South Jersey and thought it was a great option but that terminal definitely needs more room. A couple of times I had a flight at around the same time as other flights and the area inside security had barely enough room to stand let alone sit down. I hope that service to TTN works out. I live in Myrtle Beach, S.C. now and Frontier has seasonal service here from TTN, I hope to take advantage of it this summer.
Department of Redundancy Department
 
wjcandee
Posts: 8041
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2000 12:50 am

Re: New TTN Terminal Proposal

Fri Feb 08, 2019 10:41 pm

All local NIMBY opposition to anything is based on traffic and children. It's the common refrain. It ends up being pretty effective. And a great diversion. Instead of saying they don't want something because they don't like change of any kind, they say traffic and children. See we are altruistic and generous! It's the traffic and children that we are worried about.
 
Jerseyguy
Posts: 2136
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 12:05 pm

Re: New TTN Terminal Proposal

Mon Apr 01, 2019 9:26 am

PSAatSAN4Ever wrote:
Ooooh, teacher, please, I know the timeline!!

1) A group of "concerned citizens" will gather and create a new organization: Citizens for Responsible Airport Planning (CRAP). They will band together to stop the apocalypse...err, excuse me, "ensure that any building that goes on at TTN satisfies local demands for efficiency and quiet".

Translation: oppose everything that would allow even ONE extra passenger to use the airport.


:checkmark:

(Name is close Bucks Residents for Responsible Airport Management (BRRAM) should be CRAP though) BRRAM sued because Allegiant added like 1 flight a day.

PSAatSAN4Ever wrote:
2) CRAP will then find an ambulance-chaser on contingency to sue anyone and everyone who has any stake in the airport, because "none of the designs will be good enough".

Translation: kill any and all attempts by filibustering the issue endlessly.

:checkmark:

I don't know if he's an ambulance chaser but he doesn't seem to be too informed in Aviation and enviromental issues (filed petition in the wrong court). They have a new one now that they scammed the their local town into paying for, she has some experience it seems

PSAatSAN4Ever wrote:
3) The media will come on board, hoping to "present both sides of the issue".

Translation: the airport side will calmly and rationally explain a) why it is needed, b), how the plan will be paid for, and c) what it will mean for the community. CRAP will bring a large number of hysterical residents from literally the entire east coast, claiming that, "airplane noise hurts our children!" and "I moved near a major city to get away from everyone - this will just bring in more people!!", and the ever-popular, "won't somebody PLEASE think of the children?"


:checkmark:

Have pulled all the sob stories and did use children by way of saying the noise/air pollution was bad for schools, churches, etc.. They have also gone for the absurd fact route they claim Trention's expansion will turn it into LaGaurdia. In a flyer they said "Think LaGaurdia in your back yard". Not even remotely close.

PSAatSAN4Ever wrote:
4) A major compromise might be reached - and I stress "might" - when CRAP and the airport agree that the tiniest fraction of expansion can go ahead (drastically scaled down from original plans, and completely insufficient for today, much less anything in the future), but then CRAP receives, in perpetuity, total and complete veto power over ANY expansion or improvements to the airport forever. Am I being facetious? No. Think BUR. Think SNA. Think LGB. Think LAX. Think DEN, where people in the immediate vicinity are required to sign a waiver understanding that DEN is not going away or closing down just because you bought a house nearby. Think the northeast U.S. where you can't even redesign the airspace without Mr. & Mrs. Suburbia thirty miles away threatening to sue because planes might be down to 15,000 feet near their house.


Not yet but I have the fear your right, they have already chased out Southwest back in the early 2000s Only thing that may help is the majority of the complaints are coming from PA so they have less to worry about as far as re-election.
Webmaster of an unoffical TTN page see profile for details
 
airlineworker
Posts: 128
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2019 1:20 am

Re: New TTN Terminal Proposal

Mon Apr 01, 2019 7:54 pm

PSAatSAN4Ever wrote:
Ooooh, teacher, please, I know the timeline!!

1) A group of "concerned citizens" will gather and create a new organization: Citizens for Responsible Airport Planning (CRAP). They will band together to stop the apocalypse...err, excuse me, "ensure that any building that goes on at TTN satisfies local demands for efficiency and quiet".

Translation: oppose everything that would allow even ONE extra passenger to use the airport.

2) CRAP will then find an ambulance-chaser on contingency to sue anyone and everyone who has any stake in the airport, because "none of the designs will be good enough".

Translation: kill any and all attempts by filibustering the issue endlessly.

3) The media will come on board, hoping to "present both sides of the issue".

Translation: the airport side will calmly and rationally explain a) why it is needed, b), how the plan will be paid for, and c) what it will mean for the community. CRAP will bring a large number of hysterical residents from literally the entire east coast, claiming that, "airplane noise hurts our children!" and "I moved near a major city to get away from everyone - this will just bring in more people!!", and the ever-popular, "won't somebody PLEASE think of the children?"

4) A major compromise might be reached - and I stress "might" - when CRAP and the airport agree that the tiniest fraction of expansion can go ahead (drastically scaled down from original plans, and completely insufficient for today, much less anything in the future), but then CRAP receives, in perpetuity, total and complete veto power over ANY expansion or improvements to the airport forever.

Am I being facetious? No. Think BUR. Think SNA. Think LGB. Think LAX. Think DEN, where people in the immediate vicinity are required to sign a waiver understanding that DEN is not going away or closing down just because you bought a house nearby. Think the northeast U.S. where you can't even redesign the airspace without Mr. & Mrs. Suburbia thirty miles away threatening to sue because planes might be down to 15,000 feet near their house.

I hope it is different for Trenton, but NIMBY-ism will probably wipe that airport out of existence.


Carbon copy of what is going on at HVN. Airport is awaiting a vote by the state legislature on repealing a limit on the the runway length, 5600 feet. Also awaiting a decision by the federal court of appeals dealing with same issue. AA is enjoying high loads and is replacing the CRJ-200's with CRJ-700's and E-175's.

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos