Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR

 
SuperAzusa
Topic Author
Posts: 20
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2018 10:55 am

Clean sheet designs versus major upgrades of existing designs

Tue Mar 26, 2019 7:46 am

Hi Airliners,net community!

Lately there's a lot of news about the 737 family and the A320..

and I was wondering how major upgrades of these classic aircraft (like 737 Max or A320 Neo)
compare to clean sheet designs like the MC-21, A220/C series, or the Embraer E models (which have some significant overlap in seating capacity). Not sure of the C919 is a clean sheet design or an A320 evolution

What are the pros and cons?

I would imagine the pros of an evolutionary step from a classic design are:
- existing support, relationships
- common parts
- less risk/cheaper

but pros of a clean sheet design
- not constrained by older influences from decades past?
 
User avatar
Starlionblue
Posts: 20004
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 9:54 pm

Re: Clean sheet designs versus major upgrades of existing designs

Tue Mar 26, 2019 8:27 am

I would add that there is a difference between "evolving" a type originally designed for modern operations, e.g. jetbridges and large engines, vs a type originally designed for small engines and no jetbridges. Furthermore, an FBW design is immensely easier to "evolve" since the control system can be adapted with a minimum of cutting metal.
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots." - John Ringo
 
JHwk
Posts: 577
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2013 2:11 am

Re: Clean sheet designs versus major upgrades of existing designs

Thu Mar 28, 2019 7:49 am

If it is still a very similar tube with wings, the clean sheet will always have business case challenges. The gains from evolution generally outpace revolution until you have a major step-change.
 
WIederling
Posts: 9306
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2015 2:15 pm

Re: Clean sheet designs versus major upgrades of existing designs

Thu Mar 28, 2019 6:49 pm

JHwk wrote:
If it is still a very similar tube with wings, the clean sheet will always have business case challenges. The gains from evolution generally outpace revolution until you have a major step-change.


Still at some point it is better to take your knowledge gained and design a better mouse trap.
Instead of layering on various new ideas that (un?)predictably show strong allergic reactions
to the old underpinnings.
Murphy is an optimist
 
stratclub
Posts: 1372
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:38 pm

Re: Clean sheet designs versus major upgrades of existing designs

Thu Mar 28, 2019 10:01 pm

Starlionblue wrote:
I would add that there is a difference between "evolving" a type originally designed for modern operations, e.g. jetbridges and large engines, vs a type originally designed for small engines and no jetbridges. Furthermore, an FBW design is immensely easier to "evolve" since the control system can be adapted with a minimum of cutting metal.

Very true. The 737 is becoming outdated, now all Boeing has to do is get customers to quite buying it. :biggrin:
But why fix something that isn't broken? The MCAS fiasco or many other problems can happen to a clean sheet design just as easily. Deffinatly, the MAX will be the last of the 737's because of some of it's technology that goes back to the 707/720 and the no jetbridges which made it low to the ground when it was first built.

Now to answer your question, the main reason of a derivative versus a clean sheet design is cost the downside is that sometimes part of the legacy design doesn't play well with the derivitive redesign elements.
 
User avatar
Starlionblue
Posts: 20004
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 9:54 pm

Re: Clean sheet designs versus major upgrades of existing designs

Thu Mar 28, 2019 10:37 pm

The exact MCAS fiasco would not have happened on a clean sheet airliner because the engines wouldn't have been placed that far forward.

A clean sheet design can definitely have issues, but since aerodynamics are a primary driver one would assume the flight controls are proper from the start.
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots." - John Ringo
 
dakota123
Posts: 241
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 11:03 pm

Re: Clean sheet designs versus major upgrades of existing designs

Fri Mar 29, 2019 12:24 am

Starlionblue wrote:
The exact MCAS fiasco would not have happened on a clean sheet airliner because the engines wouldn't have been placed that far forward.

A clean sheet design can definitely have issues, but since aerodynamics are a primary driver one would assume the flight controls are proper from the start.


Didn’t I read somewhere that tucking the engine up that tightly (necessary to get the maximum possible clearance of course) resulted in a drag reduction? Or am i misremembering?
“And If I claim to be a wise man, well surely it means that I don’t know”
 
1989worstyear
Posts: 887
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2016 6:53 pm

Re: Clean sheet designs versus major upgrades of existing designs

Fri Mar 29, 2019 12:53 am

JHwk wrote:
If it is still a very similar tube with wings, the clean sheet will always have business case challenges. The gains from evolution generally outpace revolution until you have a major step-change.


Correct - and the last step change in the single aisle market was the A320 during 1987/88. I have my doubts we'll ever see another one.
Stuck at age 15 thanks to the certification date of the A320-200 and my parents' decision to postpone having a kid by 3 years. At least there's Dignitas...
 
WIederling
Posts: 9306
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2015 2:15 pm

Re: Clean sheet designs versus major upgrades of existing designs

Fri Mar 29, 2019 8:15 am

dakota123 wrote:
Didn’t I read somewhere that tucking the engine up that tightly (necessary to get the maximum possible clearance of course) resulted in a drag reduction? Or am i misremembering?


... In cruise flight attitude. ( i.e. lowish AoA ).
MCAS is there for HIGH AoA and the engine nacelles sticking out above the wing. ( as "viewed" by airflow :-)

Then this could just be corporate folklore.:-)
Murphy is an optimist
 
dakota123
Posts: 241
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 11:03 pm

Re: Clean sheet designs versus major upgrades of existing designs

Fri Mar 29, 2019 8:08 pm

WIederling wrote:
dakota123 wrote:
Didn’t I read somewhere that tucking the engine up that tightly (necessary to get the maximum possible clearance of course) resulted in a drag reduction? Or am i misremembering?


... In cruise flight attitude. ( i.e. lowish AoA ).
MCAS is there for HIGH AoA and the engine nacelles sticking out above the wing. ( as "viewed" by airflow :-)

Then this could just be corporate folklore.:-)


Yes, good point.
“And If I claim to be a wise man, well surely it means that I don’t know”
 
LH707330
Posts: 2340
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 11:27 pm

Re: Clean sheet designs versus major upgrades of existing designs

Sat Mar 30, 2019 4:18 pm

dakota123 wrote:
Starlionblue wrote:
The exact MCAS fiasco would not have happened on a clean sheet airliner because the engines wouldn't have been placed that far forward.

A clean sheet design can definitely have issues, but since aerodynamics are a primary driver one would assume the flight controls are proper from the start.


Didn’t I read somewhere that tucking the engine up that tightly (necessary to get the maximum possible clearance of course) resulted in a drag reduction? Or am i misremembering?

That was true for the switch from Jurassic to Classic, not sure about NG to Max.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos