Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
N292UX wrote:IMHO,I feel like CM could probably get FDF/GCM/PTP/POP/VRA to work, with some of them being on a less than daily basis.
usflyer msp wrote:PTY is basically the hub that replaced SJU for many Caribbean based travellers with the added benefit of not needing to enter the US to use it.
2travel2know2 wrote:N292UX wrote:IMHO,I feel like CM could probably get FDF/GCM/PTP/POP/VRA to work, with some of them being on a less than daily basis.
If CM can't get AF to fly FDF/PTP-PTY, if CM wants to venture into the French Caribbean, most likely CM might chose FDF over PTP as CM wouldn't be keen to fly PTY-PTP-FDF-PTY.
CM PTY-GCM very likely is a question of time and aircraft shortage. Let's wait and see.
There's not a big case for PTY-POP if CM already flies PTY-STI, better than PTY-POP would be that PTY-STI increases to daily + twice/thrice weekly.
There's a market for PTY-VRA, as it'd probably free lots of leisure seats a couple of days per week from CM PTY-HAV flights.
Other than those, guess is that sooner or later, BON, UVF or GND could be able to support a PTY flight, (BON specially if it gets a Brazilian/Argentinean Tour Operator to market holidays over-there, like the reason behind PTY-SNU) but chances of PTY-BDA/PLS/STT/ANU/CAY very low.
Brickell305 wrote:usflyer msp wrote:PTY is basically the hub that replaced SJU for many Caribbean based travellers with the added benefit of not needing to enter the US to use it.
No it did not. PTY serves a completely different purpose for most Caribbean based travelers than SJU used to. MIA replaced SJU with Caribbean based travelers.
usflyer msp wrote:Brickell305 wrote:usflyer msp wrote:PTY is basically the hub that replaced SJU for many Caribbean based travellers with the added benefit of not needing to enter the US to use it.
No it did not. PTY serves a completely different purpose for most Caribbean based travelers than SJU used to. MIA replaced SJU with Caribbean based travelers.
Yes it did in many respects. If a pax needs to fly SDQ-POS or KIN-BGI odds are they are flying CM via PTY now rather than AA via MIA.
Brickell305 wrote:usflyer msp wrote:Brickell305 wrote:No it did not. PTY serves a completely different purpose for most Caribbean based travelers than SJU used to. MIA replaced SJU with Caribbean based travelers.
Yes it did in many respects. If a pax needs to fly SDQ-POS or KIN-BGI odds are they are flying CM via PTY now rather than AA via MIA.
If a passenger needed to fly KIN-BGI , chances are they were never flying via SJU. SJU was around to funnel traffic from Eastern Caribbean islands to the mainland US. I’m not even sure SJU has had flights to KIN, NAS, GCM, etc recently. SJU was never about funneling traffic from Eastern to Western Caribbean or vice versa. Someone flying POS-SDQ is just as likely to go via MIA as they are via PTY once they have a visa. The deciding factor will likely be price.
chepos wrote:When CM still had the B737-200 milk run PTY-SJO-MGA-SAL-GUA and just opened SDQ/KIN/PAP/SJU, it was suggested CM should also fly the PTY-KIN-PAP-SDQ-SJU milk run too. CM top management didn't like the idea at all.At least in my lifetime I do not recall any Jamaica flights out of SJU. I believe in the 70’s Caribair had flights to KIN enroute to MIA.
usflyer msp wrote:
Yes it did in many respects. If a pax needs to fly SDQ-POS or KIN-BGI odds are they are flying CM via PTY now rather than AA via MIA.
chepos wrote:
At least in my lifetime I do not recall any Jamaica flights out of SJU. I believe in the 70’s Caribair had flights to KIN enroute to MIA.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
LightChop2Chop wrote:Traffic also exists on routs such as POS BZE, GEO HAV, SJO SDQ which is what makes PTY powerful as a hub. I suspect the yields are pretty high too
2travel2know2 wrote:When CM still had the B737-200 milk run PTY-SJO-MGA-SAL-GUA and just opened SDQ/KIN/PAP/SJU, it was suggested CM should also fly the PTY-KIN-PAP-SDQ-SJU milk run too. CM top management didn't like the idea at all.
usflyer msp wrote:If a pax needs to fly SDQ-POS or KIN-BGI odds are they are flying CM via PTY now rather than AA via MIA.
SJOtoLIR wrote:Copa Airlines in CARICOM, in terms of weekly frequencies by now:
CM PTY-CUN 47x
CM PTY-HAV 46x
CM PTY-PUJ 32x
CM PTY-SDQ 30x
CM PTY-SJU 13x
CM PTY-POS 12x
CM PTY-AUA 7x
CM PTY-GEO 6x
CM PTY-CUR 6x
CM PTY-MBJ 5x
CM PTY-PAP 4x
CM PTY-STI 4x
CM PTY-KIN 4x
CM PTY-SXM 4x
CM PTY-SNU 4x
CM PTY-NAS 4x
CM PTY-HOG 3x
CM PTY-BGI 2x
CM PTY-BZE 2x
Edited on December 03rd, 2019.
caribny wrote:Someone looking to spend a night out and in-bound?usflyer msp wrote:
Yes it did in many respects. If a pax needs to fly SDQ-POS or KIN-BGI odds are they are flying CM via PTY now rather than AA via MIA.
Why will someone fly KIN BGI when BW has 2x weekly nonstops on that route, plus daily services via POS. SDQ, HAV, and PAP to POS, yes.
maverick4002 wrote:Yes, it’s quite normal.Tangentially related: I am on FlightAware right now and Copa has flights on the way to:
Santiago Chile, 2 flights, scheduled to leave PTY 5 mins apart
Sao Paulo, 3 flights, scheduled to leave PTY within 15 mins of each other
Orlando, 2 flights, scheduled to leave PTY 20 mins apart
Is this normal scheduling for a lot of their routes?
maverick4002 wrote:Tangentially related: I am on FlightAware right now and Copa has flights on the way to:
Santiago Chile, 2 flights, scheduled to leave PTY 5 mins apart
Sao Paulo, 3 flights, scheduled to leave PTY within 15 mins of each other
Orlando, 2 flights, scheduled to leave PTY 20 mins apart
Is this normal scheduling for a lot of their routes?
2travel2know2 wrote:maverick4002 wrote:Yes, it’s quite normal.Tangentially related: I am on FlightAware right now and Copa has flights on the way to:
Santiago Chile, 2 flights, scheduled to leave PTY 5 mins apart
Sao Paulo, 3 flights, scheduled to leave PTY within 15 mins of each other
Orlando, 2 flights, scheduled to leave PTY 20 mins apart
Is this normal scheduling for a lot of their routes?
Seems CM already knows which hub banks demand more capacity to selected destinations.
IMHO, one hour apart would make more sense and ease current PTY take-off, landing congestion several times per day.
SJOtoLIR wrote:Copa Airlines in CARICOM, in terms of weekly frequencies by now:
CM PTY-CUR 6x
Edited on December 03rd, 2019.
SJOtoLIR wrote:Copa Airlines in CARICOM, in terms of weekly frequencies by now:
CM PTY-CUN 47x
CM PTY-HAV 46x
CM PTY-PUJ 32x
CM PTY-SDQ 30x
CM PTY-SJU 13x
CM PTY-POS 12x
CM PTY-AUA 7x
CM PTY-GEO 6x
CM PTY-CUR 6x
CM PTY-MBJ 5x
CM PTY-PAP 4x
CM PTY-STI 4x
CM PTY-KIN 4x
CM PTY-SXM 4x
CM PTY-SNU 4x
CM PTY-NAS 4x
CM PTY-HOG 3x
CM PTY-BGI 2x
CM PTY-BZE 2x
Edited on December 03rd, 2019.
SFOA380 wrote:My brother has a place on St. Maarten and flies SFO-SXM 2 or 3 times per year and Copa is by far his preferred carrier. Lie flat biz for as little as $700 r/t.