Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
LTEN11 wrote:pommy80 wrote:Cathay Pacific Cargo to operate a weekly service from Darwin to Hong Kong, named the "Mango Express". Runs for 5 weeks.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/rural/2022- ... /101612112
I love the fact that a 77W can carry 50000 kgs for freight, it is a beast.
evanb wrote:LTEN11 wrote:pommy80 wrote:Cathay Pacific Cargo to operate a weekly service from Darwin to Hong Kong, named the "Mango Express". Runs for 5 weeks.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/rural/2022- ... /101612112
I love the fact that a 77W can carry 50000 kgs for freight, it is a beast.
Sure, if you're carrying no pax and only flying 2,300nm. Most widebodies could carry the weight on an empty shortish run like that. The A333 would get close, an A332 can purely on payload. The more challenging part would actually be volume and floor strength, not payload limitations.
The B77W can take 14 pallets and about 57t (max structural weight for cargo based on floor strength and pallet limits - not performance related). To put into perspective, a B789 could actually take 60t, but only 11 pallets. A332 and A333, 8 and 10 pallets, 40t and 44t (some older ones a little less). Another challenge is that each pallet has a maximum weight, but that is generally higher than the floor weight.
smi0006 wrote:utaussiefan wrote:Jetstar Asia and Changi airport have come to an agreement which will see them move to Terminal 4 by mid March after initially stating they had no intentions of moving.
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapo ... ?cid=FBcna
That’s a shame for lounges access and interlining with QF. Will Scoot be down there too?
I wonder hutch traffic transfers between QF/3K
TN486T wrote:Can someone explain to me the reasons behind 3K being transferred to T4? How is 3K doing anyway? I seem to think?? that they are an afterthought these days.
pusserchef wrote:With the recent acquisition of Airwork by a Chinese company from a New Zealand firm, will this make any difference to its operations within Australia?
VirginFlyer wrote:pusserchef wrote:With the recent acquisition of Airwork by a Chinese company from a New Zealand firm, will this make any difference to its operations within Australia?
Recent? It was five years ago. This article is from 8th November 2017: https://www.nbr.co.nz/airwork-to-delist ... -takeover/
V/F
Obzerva wrote:Believe it was mentioned on a previous month's thread. there was a QF vs VA tussle for the last 172 seats open on the Australia-DPS route.
VA were asking for the extra seats for an additional weekly MEL-DPS.
QF were asking for a sometime upgrade for SYD-DPS from a 737 to an A330.
QF withdrew their application, and VA has been awarded for the next 5 years.
Obzerva wrote:Believe it was mentioned on a previous month's thread. there was a QF vs VA tussle for the last 172 seats open on the Australia-DPS route.
VA were asking for the extra seats for an additional weekly MEL-DPS.
QF were asking for a sometime upgrade for SYD-DPS from a 737 to an A330.
QF withdrew their application, and VA has been awarded for the next 5 years.
qf2220 wrote:Obzerva wrote:Believe it was mentioned on a previous month's thread. there was a QF vs VA tussle for the last 172 seats open on the Australia-DPS route.
VA were asking for the extra seats for an additional weekly MEL-DPS.
QF were asking for a sometime upgrade for SYD-DPS from a 737 to an A330.
QF withdrew their application, and VA has been awarded for the next 5 years.
Cue SQ takeover speculation posts.
smi0006 wrote:Qantas has also sold its remaining 12% stake in Hello-world for 33mil. Apart from Loyalty, Jetstar group, and FJ outside - they are down to core airlines? Or red dot data or something?
https://www.qantasnewsroom.com.au/media ... elloworld/
LoganTheBogan wrote:Does anyone have any info on VH-ZPA? She came into WGA on the 22nd September after suffering an engine failure on approach and has been grounded ever since.
Does CASA require the aircraft to remain on ground for an investigation?
tullamarine wrote:qf2220 wrote:Obzerva wrote:Believe it was mentioned on a previous month's thread. there was a QF vs VA tussle for the last 172 seats open on the Australia-DPS route.
VA were asking for the extra seats for an additional weekly MEL-DPS.
QF were asking for a sometime upgrade for SYD-DPS from a 737 to an A330.
QF withdrew their application, and VA has been awarded for the next 5 years.
Cue SQ takeover speculation posts.
What does an extra VA flight between MEL-DPS have to do with a takeover offer from SQ?
smi0006 wrote:Qantas has also sold its remaining 12% stake in Hello-world for 33mil. Apart from Loyalty, Jetstar group, and FJ outside - they are down to core airlines? Or red dot data or something?
https://www.qantasnewsroom.com.au/media ... elloworld/
SCFlyer wrote:VA set to strengthen partnerships with HA, AC and NH with codeshare and reciprocation benefits, joining the 'Big 3' of QR, UA and SQ.
This leaves the question of the futures of VA's 'secondary' partners of EY, SA, VS, HNA group, etc if they will be 'sticking around' as VFF partners.
The HNA carriers and VS aren't likely to be flying to Australia for the foreseeable future (if at all), SA's future in the long-haul international space is still under a cloud and EY is 'just there' as VA promotes QR over them.
https://www.executivetraveller.com/news ... n-airlines
Obzerva wrote:SCFlyer wrote:VA set to strengthen partnerships with HA, AC and NH with codeshare and reciprocation benefits, joining the 'Big 3' of QR, UA and SQ.
This leaves the question of the futures of VA's 'secondary' partners of EY, SA, VS, HNA group, etc if they will be 'sticking around' as VFF partners.
The HNA carriers and VS aren't likely to be flying to Australia for the foreseeable future (if at all), SA's future in the long-haul international space is still under a cloud and EY is 'just there' as VA promotes QR over them.
https://www.executivetraveller.com/news ... n-airlines
The EY one is interesting.
EY has always been more successful when it has an Australian partner.
From the VA perspective, if VA put zero promotion in to EY being a partner, but EY is still happy to stump up the cash to Virgin to essentially buy Velocity points from Virgin, I'm not sure what benefit there would be in VA in ending the agreement.
It's a revenue stream where they don't have to put any effort in to, it just kind of sits there doing it's thing.
qf2048 wrote:Just in the Sydney qantas club. Can see a ZL 737 in the qf hanger (245)
F100Flyer wrote:VA9081 F100 PER-OCM (Boolgeeda) currently circling off the Perth coast straight after takeoff. I don’t have access to squawk codes but is number 1 tracked in the world so assuming some kind of - without putting a media spin on it - emergency.
tullamarine wrote:Obzerva wrote:SCFlyer wrote:VA set to strengthen partnerships with HA, AC and NH with codeshare and reciprocation benefits, joining the 'Big 3' of QR, UA and SQ.
This leaves the question of the futures of VA's 'secondary' partners of EY, SA, VS, HNA group, etc if they will be 'sticking around' as VFF partners.
The HNA carriers and VS aren't likely to be flying to Australia for the foreseeable future (if at all), SA's future in the long-haul international space is still under a cloud and EY is 'just there' as VA promotes QR over them.
https://www.executivetraveller.com/news ... n-airlines
The EY one is interesting.
EY has always been more successful when it has an Australian partner.
From the VA perspective, if VA put zero promotion in to EY being a partner, but EY is still happy to stump up the cash to Virgin to essentially buy Velocity points from Virgin, I'm not sure what benefit there would be in VA in ending the agreement.
It's a revenue stream where they don't have to put any effort in to, it just kind of sits there doing it's thing.
Of all the current partners, you would think VS would be the most likely to, at some point, exit from Velocity. VS is effectively controlled by DL who is no longer a Velocity partner. VS has also reoriented its network so it is almost exclusively trans-Atlantic. There are few routes that VS now offers that UA cannot fulfil.
I agree EY will probably remain. It is a low-cost arrangement for both and would only be under threat if Qatar firmly pushed back which they obviously haven't.
tullamarine wrote:F100Flyer wrote:VA9081 F100 PER-OCM (Boolgeeda) currently circling off the Perth coast straight after takeoff. I don’t have access to squawk codes but is number 1 tracked in the world so assuming some kind of - without putting a media spin on it - emergency.
Can a F100 dump fuel or does it have to burn a bit to get back down to a safe landing weight? I assume the latter given it is flying under 6000 feet.
LTEN11 wrote:tullamarine wrote:F100Flyer wrote:VA9081 F100 PER-OCM (Boolgeeda) currently circling off the Perth coast straight after takeoff. I don’t have access to squawk codes but is number 1 tracked in the world so assuming some kind of - without putting a media spin on it - emergency.
Can a F100 dump fuel or does it have to burn a bit to get back down to a safe landing weight? I assume the latter given it is flying under 6000 feet.
If it was seriousness enough they wouldn't be worrying about getting the weight down, so can't be too urgent.
LTEN11 wrote:
If it was seriousness enough they wouldn't be worrying about getting the weight down, so can't be too urgent.
Velocity7 wrote:LTEN11 wrote:
If it was seriousness enough they wouldn't be worrying about getting the weight down, so can't be too urgent.
Was wondering why it circled for so long but then it was probably tankering fuel for the return as welll? Not sure if these mining towns are equipped to refuel?
jrfspa320 wrote:Velocity7 wrote:LTEN11 wrote:
If it was seriousness enough they wouldn't be worrying about getting the weight down, so can't be too urgent.
Was wondering why it circled for so long but then it was probably tankering fuel for the return as welll? Not sure if these mining towns are equipped to refuel?
Most can refuel but usually far cheaper to tanker for the return
SCFlyer wrote:tullamarine wrote:Obzerva wrote:
The EY one is interesting.
EY has always been more successful when it has an Australian partner.
From the VA perspective, if VA put zero promotion in to EY being a partner, but EY is still happy to stump up the cash to Virgin to essentially buy Velocity points from Virgin, I'm not sure what benefit there would be in VA in ending the agreement.
It's a revenue stream where they don't have to put any effort in to, it just kind of sits there doing it's thing.
Of all the current partners, you would think VS would be the most likely to, at some point, exit from Velocity. VS is effectively controlled by DL who is no longer a Velocity partner. VS has also reoriented its network so it is almost exclusively trans-Atlantic. There are few routes that VS now offers that UA cannot fulfil.
I agree EY will probably remain. It is a low-cost arrangement for both and would only be under threat if Qatar firmly pushed back which they obviously haven't.
Either that, or if ZL approaches EY with an offer they can't refuse. Saying that ZL approaching EY is unlikely at this stage, but we'll never know with the partnership surprises across the world in the past 12 months.
Obzerva wrote:SCFlyer wrote:VA set to strengthen partnerships with HA, AC and NH with codeshare and reciprocation benefits, joining the 'Big 3' of QR, UA and SQ.
This leaves the question of the futures of VA's 'secondary' partners of EY, SA, VS, HNA group, etc if they will be 'sticking around' as VFF partners.
The HNA carriers and VS aren't likely to be flying to Australia for the foreseeable future (if at all), SA's future in the long-haul international space is still under a cloud and EY is 'just there' as VA promotes QR over them.
https://www.executivetraveller.com/news ... n-airlines
The EY one is interesting.
EY has always been more successful when it has an Australian partner.
From the VA perspective, if VA put zero promotion in to EY being a partner, but EY is still happy to stump up the cash to Virgin to essentially buy Velocity points from Virgin, I'm not sure what benefit there would be in VA in ending the agreement.
It's a revenue stream where they don't have to put any effort in to, it just kind of sits there doing it's thing.
tristans wrote:https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-11-10/virgin-flight-aborted-off-wa-unplanned-landing-perth-airport/101638296
Gotta love the media..
It had to "abort" the flight as there was an issue with the flaps, they wouldn't deploy ...hmmm
LoganTheBogan wrote:qf2048 wrote:Just in the Sydney qantas club. Can see a ZL 737 in the qf hanger (245)
Rex has a couple of 737s AOG which has lead to multiple domestic cancellations over the last three days. My guess is they’ve desperately made an agreement with QF to repair a cracked windshield on one of them.
LoganTheBogan wrote:qf2048 wrote:Just in the Sydney qantas club. Can see a ZL 737 in the qf hanger (245)
Rex has a couple of 737s AOG which has lead to multiple domestic cancellations over the last three days. My guess is they’ve desperately made an agreement with QF to repair a cracked windshield on one of them.
eamondzhang wrote:VH-EBF is on its final leg towards DRS as QF7531, as part of a long journey flying SYD-MEL-ADL-PER-SIN-DRS.
I assume this means the end of its career as a pax-carrying A330 and it'll get converted at DRS.
Michael
Fuling wrote:eamondzhang wrote:VH-EBF is on its final leg towards DRS as QF7531, as part of a long journey flying SYD-MEL-ADL-PER-SIN-DRS.
I assume this means the end of its career as a pax-carrying A330 and it'll get converted at DRS.
Michael
Any idea why it made all those short domestic hops before heading to SIN?
Fuling wrote:eamondzhang wrote:VH-EBF is on its final leg towards DRS as QF7531, as part of a long journey flying SYD-MEL-ADL-PER-SIN-DRS.
I assume this means the end of its career as a pax-carrying A330 and it'll get converted at DRS.
Michael
Any idea why it made all those short domestic hops before heading to SIN?
tullamarine wrote:Fuling wrote:eamondzhang wrote:VH-EBF is on its final leg towards DRS as QF7531, as part of a long journey flying SYD-MEL-ADL-PER-SIN-DRS.
I assume this means the end of its career as a pax-carrying A330 and it'll get converted at DRS.
Michael
Any idea why it made all those short domestic hops before heading to SIN?
Maybe QF were stripping certain items from the plane along the way which will become rotable spares in the various ports.
tristans wrote:https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-11-10/virgin-flight-aborted-off-wa-unplanned-landing-perth-airport/101638296
Gotta love the media..
It had to "abort" the flight as there was an issue with the flaps, they wouldn't deploy ...hmmm