LAXdude1023
Topic Author
Posts: 5675
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 3:16 pm

The Decline In Service At ONT

Fri Jan 09, 2015 10:04 pm

The title is pretty self explanitory. I know part of it was the decline the IE faced when the economy bottomed out, but service levels are at a low not seen in over two decades. In 2013, ONT did not even get four million passengers which I found pretty crazy.

Currently ONT is left with year round mainline service to the following destinations:

Southwest - MDW, DEN, LAS, OAK, PHX, SMF, and SJC.
American - DFW
Alaska - SEA
Delta - SLC
US Airways - PHX
Volaris - GDL
AeroMexico - GDL

United got rid of all mainline flights to ONT. All flights to SFO, DEN, and IAH are opperated on RJs. It also appears as though Delta has pulled the seasonal ATL-ONT flight from GDS.

Granted I havent lived in the Los Angeles area in about 5 years now, but I used to like using ONT even if I had to make the drive because it was so much eaiser than LAX. I was my number two after SNA since I was left from work in Garden Grove many times.

Weve seen other airports bounce back since the depression, yet ONT keep declining. What would it take to get ONT back on its feet?
Religion is the root of evil...
 
29erUSA187
Posts: 1277
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:34 pm

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Fri Jan 09, 2015 10:14 pm

I dont know why its declining so fast, but it suprises me that AA still flies mainline and UA does not. AA is usually the stingiest with thier mainline equipment

While ONT is losing pax, it has maintained a massive Cargo operation. Is there any chance of this growing larger?

Quoting LAXdude1023 (Thread starter):
Southwest - MDW, DEN, LAS, OAK, PHX, SMF, and SJC.
American - DFW
Alaska - SEA
Delta - SLC
US Airways - PHX
Volaris - GDL
AeroMexico - GDL

This has to be one the highest % out of toal ops for almsot any airport!
 
mikesairways
Posts: 664
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2003 1:47 am

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Fri Jan 09, 2015 10:18 pm

I think part of the problem is now that you see JetBlue and Virgin America starting to go after the premium traveler, the big guys (AA, DL and UA) have had to put their focus at LAX to defend and maintain that. It's sad, but they only seem to go where the money is.
The red zone is for the immediate loading and unloading of passengers only, there is no stopping in the white zone...(Ai
 
commavia
Posts: 11489
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 2:30 am

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Fri Jan 09, 2015 10:24 pm

Quoting 29erUSA187 (Reply 1):
I dont know why its declining so fast, but it suprises me that AA still flies mainline and UA does not.

It seems AA has historically long been a very strong competitor at ONT - through ups and downs in the macro economy and AA's own finances, those multiple daily MD80s to DFW have remained relatively steady for a very, very long time. As a personal anecdote, I myself know several ONT-based flyers that live in Temecula, etc. who travel frequently back and forth to IAD, EWR, occasionally DFW, etc. and they only fly AA and have been AAdvantage members for decades.

Quoting 29erUSA187 (Reply 1):
AA is usually the stingiest with thier mainline equipment

I do not agree with that assessment. On the contrary, there are lots and lots of markets throughout the U.S. where AA retains a not-insignificant amount of mainline capacity and where competitors - especially United - have far less, if any.

Quoting mikesairways (Reply 2):
the big guys (AA, DL and UA) have had to put their focus at LAX to defend and maintain that. It's sad, but they only seem to go where the money is.

I agree that AA, Delta and United have all become relatively more concentrated (i.e., % of total LA basin capacity) at LAX in recent years as they "go where the money is," but I think that has less to do with fighting the growing presence of low-cost carriers (like JetBlue or Virgin) at LAX and more to do with the inescapable reality, validated again and again by market experience, that premium traffic demand in Southern California is concentrated at LAX - for better or worse.
 
mikesairways
Posts: 664
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2003 1:47 am

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Fri Jan 09, 2015 10:33 pm

Quoting commavia (Reply 3):
I agree that AA, Delta and United have all become relatively more concentrated (i.e., % of total LA basin capacity) at LAX in recent years as they "go where the money is," but I think that has less to do with fighting the growing presence of low-cost carriers (like JetBlue or Virgin) at LAX and more to do with the inescapable reality, validated again and again by market experience, that premium traffic demand in Southern California is concentrated at LAX - for better or worse.

And to be honest the same can be said up SJC land as well - SFO will probably always have the nicer planes, premium routes and more destinations than us. As much as I want our little SJC to have the likes of BA, LH, etc here, we sadly will be always be in the shadows of SFO. I'm grateful we have ANA here at least - and from what I hear it's still going strong.
The red zone is for the immediate loading and unloading of passengers only, there is no stopping in the white zone...(Ai
 
Legend757
Posts: 90
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 6:59 pm

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Fri Jan 09, 2015 10:34 pm

Quoting LAXdude1023 (Thread starter):
Weve seen other airports bounce back since the depression, yet ONT keep declining. What would it take to get ONT back on its feet?
Quoting mikesairways (Reply 2):
I think part of the problem is now that you see JetBlue and Virgin America starting to go after the premium traveler, the big guys (AA, DL and UA) have had to put their focus at LAX to defend and maintain that. It's sad, but they only seem to go where the money is.

  

Many secondary airports seem to have lost their flavor for many airlines. Even G4's focus lately has been elsewhere with build ups in CVG, MSY, IND and PIT.

I think what keeps new entrants from considering ONT is the expense. IIRC, ONT is pricey for the airlines to operate out of.
 
User avatar
LAXintl
Posts: 23549
Joined: Wed May 24, 2000 12:12 pm

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Fri Jan 09, 2015 10:44 pm

Quoting LAXdude1023 (Thread starter):
Weve seen other airports bounce back since the depression, yet ONT keep declining.

How about decline of BUR, or decline at LGB? Or loss of airline services at one secondary airport after another in the U.S.?

Until recently when SNA traffic picked up, every LA basin airport sans LAX were experiencing declines.

Quoting Legend757 (Reply 5):
I think what keeps new entrants from considering ONT is the expense. IIRC, ONT is pricey for the airlines to operate out of.

Its cheaper than LAX.
From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
 
alasizon
Posts: 1660
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 8:57 pm

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Fri Jan 09, 2015 10:56 pm

Quoting Legend757 (Reply 5):
I think what keeps new entrants from considering ONT is the expense. IIRC, ONT is pricey for the airlines to operate out of.

Its pricey for passenger airlines due to the terminals that are far overbuilt.

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 6):
Quoting Legend757 (Reply 5):
I think what keeps new entrants from considering ONT is the expense. IIRC, ONT is pricey for the airlines to operate out of.

Its cheaper than LAX.

It may be cheaper in terms of overhead, but the yields make a big difference.

From what I have seen, the loads to PHX are usually pretty good on US, usually about 60-90 bags inbound and about 50-75 outbound on a CR9. Mainline I would imagine still sees the value in it since only 2 frequencies are CR9s and only on certain days.

It suffers from being in the Inland Empire and the fact that the area is still relatively poor. Also, there are quite a few transplants to the IE that are from Mexico and as such travel to LAX for everywhere in Mexico and Central America other than GDL.
Manager on Duty & Tower Planner
 
ScottB
Posts: 6560
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2000 1:25 am

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Fri Jan 09, 2015 11:42 pm

Quoting alasizon (Reply 7):
It may be cheaper in terms of overhead, but the yields make a big difference.

And you have just answered the question as to why service has declined at ONT -- yields are generally poor. That has been a problem since the Inland Empire economy basically imploded in the wake of the 2008 real estate collapse.

Quoting alasizon (Reply 7):
Its pricey for passenger airlines due to the terminals that are far overbuilt.

The terminals weren't overbuilt at the time they were constructed. Unfortunately, it's not possible to just unbuild the terminals and get the money back.

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 6):
How about decline of BUR, or decline at LGB? Or loss of airline services at one secondary airport after another in the U.S.?

Until recently when SNA traffic picked up, every LA basin airport sans LAX were experiencing declines.

  

Quoting 29erUSA187 (Reply 1):
I dont know why its declining so fast, but it suprises me that AA still flies mainline and UA does not. AA is usually the stingiest with thier mainline equipment

AA doesn't really have any hubs (well, didn't before the merger with US) which are close enough to serve economically with RJ's. DFW-ONT is a long, long way for an ERJ and that's a very high-cost aircraft for a yield-challenged market. Sure, they also had CR7's but they also had a lot of markets to cover with a small fleet and DFW-ONT would take up at least half a day for each round-trip. And it's dumb to fly people from ONT to LAX on RJ's, before anyone brings up the LAX hub.

Quoting commavia (Reply 3):
I think that has less to do with fighting the growing presence of low-cost carriers (like JetBlue or Virgin) at LAX and more to do with the inescapable reality, validated again and again by market experience, that premium traffic demand in Southern California is concentrated at LAX - for better or worse.

I think that's part of it -- but it's also the case that passengers will make trade-offs between price, schedule, and convenience. LAX basically beats every airport in the region for schedule and is virtually always price-competitive, so many will sacrifice convenience and drive to LAX for more frequent service or non-stops at a comparable price.

Something like 1x daily ATL-ONT is going to struggle if there are a dozen or more ATL-LAX flights -- unless the ATL-ONT flight is just far cheaper. But then why steal the traffic from yourself at a lower yield?
 
LAXdude1023
Topic Author
Posts: 5675
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 3:16 pm

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sat Jan 10, 2015 12:07 am

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 6):
How about decline of BUR, or decline at LGB? Or loss of airline services at one secondary airport after another in the U.S.?

Im well aware ONT isnt the only secondary airport that has had difficulties. Many others seem to have rebounded while ONT has continued to decline. Not only is it declining, its peer airports (in terms of passenger count) would be something along the lines of OKC and BHM. That is something that takes me by surprise. Not only has ONT never recovered from the economic downtown, its continuing to decline.

Quoting ScottB (Reply 8):

AA doesn't really have any hubs (well, didn't before the merger with US) which are close enough to serve economically with RJ's. DFW-ONT is a long, long way for an ERJ and that's a very high-cost aircraft for a yield-challenged market. Sure, they also had CR7's but they also had a lot of markets to cover with a small fleet and DFW-ONT would take up at least half a day for each round-trip. And it's dumb to fly people from ONT to LAX on RJ's, before anyone brings up the LAX hub.

What is different about DFW-ONT vs. IAH/ATL-ONT is market size. Its well over twice the size of both and its a shorter distance. I dont think ONT is killing the yields to any destination, but I think that will keep DFW-ONT afloat.
Religion is the root of evil...
 
dc10lover
Posts: 1535
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2014 6:11 pm

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sat Jan 10, 2015 12:12 am

Since i didn't know much about Ontario International Airport i went searching. Looks like there is a law suit over control of the airport. Then we have a so called "Judge" saying the law suit is "‘long, complicated’. It is not complicated. Give the airport back to the City of Ontario. Seems like people have a stake in LAX and would love to shut down Ontario Airport. (Force everyone to use LAX)

Just like airlines, airports do not like competition. People will travel to other cities / places to fly out for cheaper airfares. If the City of Ontario can regain the airport then i expect costs would come down and fares will be lower so more people will fly out of Ontario.

It will be interesting to find out about this so called "Judge's" ruling. (Just like Politicians - "Judges" are corrupt as well)
Why endure the nightmare and congestion of LAX when BUR, LGB, ONT & SNA is so much easier to fly in and out of. Same with OAK & SJC when it comes to SFO.
 
ericm2031
Posts: 1039
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 8:46 am

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sat Jan 10, 2015 12:13 am

ONT-DFW is not that long for an ERJ...look at all the RJs flying from the LA basin to Texas by AA and DL
 
LAXdude1023
Topic Author
Posts: 5675
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 3:16 pm

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sat Jan 10, 2015 12:24 am

Quoting ericm2031 (Reply 11):
ONT-DFW is not that long for an ERJ...look at all the RJs flying from the LA basin to Texas by AA and DL

AA doesnt fly any RJs to Southern California from Texas. Not a single one.
Religion is the root of evil...
 
User avatar
LAXintl
Posts: 23549
Joined: Wed May 24, 2000 12:12 pm

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sat Jan 10, 2015 12:28 am

Quoting LAXdude1023 (Reply 9):
Im well aware ONT isnt the only secondary airport that has had difficulties. Many others seem to have rebounded while ONT has continued to decline. Not only is it declining, its peer airports (in terms of passenger count) would be something along the lines of OKC and BHM. That is something that takes me by surprise. Not only has ONT never recovered from the economic downtown, its continuing to decline.

BUR continues its decline as well...

Pax totals.

2007 - 5,921,336
2008 - 5,331,404
2009 - 4,588,433
2010 - 4,461,271
2011 - 4,301,568
2012 - 4,056,416
2013 - 3,844,092
2014 - 3.7 mil per media report

Thats a 40% decline, almost identical to ONT 44% during similar time frame.

ONT just gets undue attention due to bunch of loud local politicos. But the industry changes are far beyond unique to ONT.

Quoting DC10LOVER (Reply 10):
Give the airport back to the City of Ontario. Seems like people have a stake in LAX and would love to shut down Ontario Airport. (Force everyone to use LAX)

LA City has said it would sell the airport back for the right price - one that allows it recoup its multi-decade investments into the airport.
Remember LA City did not end up with ONT due to any shenanigans. The City of Ontario was broke and walked away from it 1960s. FAA brokered a deal where LA City would assume operations and later ownership of the airport in return for major upgrades (new runways, terminal etc).
From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
 
MAH4546
Posts: 25655
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2001 1:44 pm

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sat Jan 10, 2015 12:30 am

Quoting LAXdude1023 (Reply 12):

Quoting ericm2031 (Reply 11):
ONT-DFW is not that long for an ERJ...look at all the RJs flying from the LA basin to Texas by AA and DL

AA doesnt fly any RJs to Southern California from Texas. Not a single one.

LAX-ELP/IAH/SAT and, starting in May, a 5th daily LAX-AUS frequency will be an RJ on top of the four mainline flights.
a.
 
LAXdude1023
Topic Author
Posts: 5675
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 3:16 pm

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sat Jan 10, 2015 12:31 am

Quoting Mah4546 (Reply 14):
LAX-ELP/IAH/SAT and, starting in May, a 5th daily LAX-AUS frequency will be an RJ on top of the four mainline flights.

Youre right. I was thinking DFW not Texas in my head. Sorry about that.
Religion is the root of evil...
 
User avatar
DarkSnowyNight
Posts: 2240
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2012 7:59 pm

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sat Jan 10, 2015 12:34 am

Quoting DC10LOVER (Reply 10):
It is not complicated. Give the airport back to the City of Ontario. Seems like people have a stake in LAX and would love to shut down Ontario Airport. (Force everyone to use LAX)

The issue isn't that LAWA wants to keep ONT until the day before forever. It's that they can't get a reasonable offer from the Ontario or the IE cities.
"Ya Can't Win, Rocky! There's no Oxygen on Mars!"
"Yeah? That means there's no Oxygen for him Neither..."
 
SurfandSnow
Posts: 1432
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 7:09 am

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sat Jan 10, 2015 12:40 am

Quoting LAXdude1023 (Thread starter):
part of it was the decline the IE faced when the economy bottomed out

Part of it was the airport's high costs. Part of it was the U.S. airline industry's renewed focus on primary airports. ONT's primary tenant WN changed its entire network strategy from catering strictly to VFR and leisure travelers at secondary airports and medium-sized markets to serving business travelers at primary airports and virtually all of the nation's largest markets. WN aggressively expanded at the likes of BOS, BWI, DAL, DCA, DEN, HOU, LAX, LGA, MDW, MSP, SFO, etc. - largely at the expense of its alternate and smaller market stations like ABQ, BHM, BUR, ELP, ISP, MHT, ONT, ORF, PVD, SLC, etc.

Quoting LAXdude1023 (Thread starter):
service levels are at a low not seen in over two decades. In 2013, ONT did not even get four million passengers which I found pretty crazy.

I would think ONT's worst days are behind them. The Inland Empire is currently the fastest-growing region in all of Southern California, and strong growth is forecast for the coming years. The economic growth is a lot more broad-based than it was in the past and includes notable gains of higher paying jobs. This should ultimately translate into increased demand for air service, though it may be worth noting that demographic challenges remain: local unemployment is higher than the state average and local wages are considerably lower than the California average.

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-f...empire-economy-20141023-story.html

Quoting LAXdude1023 (Thread starter):
Southwest - MDW, DEN, LAS, OAK, PHX, SMF, and SJC

Looks like those seasonal nonstop ONT-RNO flights didn't pan out, but maybe they could try ONT-SJD flights (with feed from NorCal and LAS, it might just work). Given UA's drastic reduction in capacity on the ONT-IAH route, maybe WN could add ONT-HOU service. However, with WN making an 8 figure investment in the renovation of LAX Terminal 1, growth at ONT (or BUR) is probably an afterthought.

Quoting LAXdude1023 (Thread starter):
United got rid of all mainline flights to ONT. All flights to SFO, DEN, and IAH are opperated on RJs.

This is UA we are talking about. I for one would be shocked if they still offered mainline service at ONT  !

Quoting LAXdude1023 (Thread starter):
It also appears as though Delta has pulled the seasonal ATL-ONT flight from GDS.

Wasn't the "seasonal" ATL-ONT just a few flights around the Christmas/New Year holidays? If that service did well maybe they can convince DL to restore service throughout the busy summer travel period.

Quoting LAXdude1023 (Thread starter):
I used to like using ONT even if I had to make the drive because it was so much eaiser than LAX.

People love the convenience of the alternate airports, but the all-important business travelers prefer LAX (better schedules, larger aircraft, lounges, nonstop flights, etc.). Even BUR - within spitting distance of the studios and Hollywood Hills - struggles to attract the higher yielding types, while ONT is so far from most of the LA tourist attractions, businesses, and wealthy residents that it isn't even considered.

Quoting LAXdude1023 (Thread starter):
Weve seen other airports bounce back since the depression, yet ONT keep declining.

A lot of the secondary metropolitan airports are still struggling. In California alone you have BUR, LGB, OAK, and SJC in addition to ONT. The airlines - legacies, LCCs, and now even the ULCCs - are all focused on primary airports/markets. As LAX gains more competition (lower fares), nonstop flights and improved amenities, ONT becomes less attractive. PSP has gained LCC service, so folks in the Coachella Valley are less likely to use ONT as well.

Quoting LAXdude1023 (Thread starter):
What would it take to get ONT back on its feet?

ONT is back on its feet. AFAIK the cuts have stopped, Y4 started service, and DL has shown a willingness to resume ATL-ONT (however briefly). If the local economy continues to improve as expected, maybe we could see new attempts at routes like ATL, HNL, JFK, ORD, SJD, etc. in the coming years.
Flying in the middle seat of coach is much better than not flying at all!
 
LAXdude1023
Topic Author
Posts: 5675
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 3:16 pm

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sat Jan 10, 2015 12:47 am

Quoting SurfandSnow (Reply 17):
People love the convenience of the alternate airports, but the all-important business travelers prefer LAX (better schedules, larger aircraft, lounges, nonstop flights, etc.). Even BUR - within spitting distance of the studios and Hollywood Hills - struggles to attract the higher yielding types, while ONT is so far from most of the LA tourist attractions, businesses, and wealthy residents that it isn't even considered.

It depends on the type of traffic too.

I lived in LA for most of my adult life and even though LAX was far closer, I would go out to ONT to fly on many occasions. I could get off the plane, get my bag, and be out of the airport in 15 minutes. LAX offers a lot more options, but any time my final destination was just DFW or IAH, I would always use ONT or SNA. If I was flying internationally I would use LAX. But that is from a resident perspective.

LA also gets a ton of tourists. For them, I cannot see ONT being an option at all. Its very far from anything a tourist would want to see in Southern California.
Religion is the root of evil...
 
dumbell2424
Posts: 925
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 2:45 pm

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sat Jan 10, 2015 12:59 am

Part of me feels like B6 will be returning sooner rather than later.
 
BigGSFO
Posts: 2258
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 5:27 am

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sat Jan 10, 2015 1:16 am

Quoting LAXdude1023 (Thread starter):
Alaska - SEA

Alaska also servies ONTPDX
 
doug_or
Posts: 3232
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2000 9:55 am

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sat Jan 10, 2015 1:52 am

Quoting BigGSFO (Reply 20):

Alaska also servies ONTPDX

With 2 daily SkyWest CR7s

Quoting LAXdude1023 (Thread starter):
Currently ONT is left with year round mainline service to the following destinations:
When in doubt, one B pump off
 
2travel2know2
Posts: 2774
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 3:01 pm

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sat Jan 10, 2015 2:35 am

Quoting ScottB (Reply 8):
The terminals weren't overbuilt at the time they were constructed. Unfortunately, it's not possible to just unbuild the terminals and get the money back.

Any spare room available at any of ONT main 2 terminals to move Port-of-Entry over-there and close the international arrivals terminal?

As for international flights ONT only has GDL flights, how come no MEX or GUA or SAL service? Demographics are there to support those routes.
I'm not on CM's payroll.
 
continental004
Posts: 362
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 11:53 pm

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sat Jan 10, 2015 2:38 am

My family and I flew ONT-PHX last spring. We live only about 20-30 minutes away from ONT, and my father prefers to fly out of ONT when possible when traveling for business or otherwise because "it's an easy airport." However, all of us were astounded at how empty the airport was. After we landed back home from PHX on one of the last flights of the day, the airport was almost a ghost town.

Five years ago I flew ONT-IAH-LHR. Back then CO had 737s flying to and from ONT, compared to the RJs UA uses now. It was a great alternative to LAX because everything was smaller scale, and I paid ~$1200 USD for the flight bought only a few weeks before (this was 2010).
 
User avatar
LAXintl
Posts: 23549
Joined: Wed May 24, 2000 12:12 pm

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sat Jan 10, 2015 3:04 am

Quoting 2travel2know2 (Reply 22):
Any spare room available at any of ONT main 2 terminals to move Port-of-Entry over-there and close the international arrivals terminal?

Room yes suppose so, but someone would have to fund the millions for build out a FIS facility.

Quoting 2travel2know2 (Reply 22):
how come no MEX or GUA or SAL service? Demographics are there to support those routes.

TACA looked at ONT about 2-3 years ago but opted against it.
From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
 
ldvaviation
Posts: 1238
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:21 pm

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sat Jan 10, 2015 3:51 am

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 13):
Thats a 40% decline, almost identical to
Quoting LAXintl (Reply 13):
LA City has said it would sell the airport back for the right price - one that allows it recoup its multi-decade investments into the airport.
Remember LA City did not end up with Top
 
User avatar
SFOA380
Posts: 561
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 4:35 am

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sat Jan 10, 2015 5:03 pm

Quoting SurfandSnow (Reply 17):
In California alone you have BUR, LGB, OAK, and SJC in addition to ONT.

SJC and OAK are not struggling. They are not back to their historic highs, but their growth has been quite healthy the past couple of years.
 
tylersmithsjc
Posts: 118
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2013 1:52 am

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sat Jan 10, 2015 5:34 pm

Quoting SFOA380 (Reply 26):
SJC and OAK are not struggling. They are not back to their historic highs, but their growth has been quite healthy the past couple of years.

Exactly. I don't know why people think all secondary airports are struggling. SJC must be really struggling if it has NH with a 788 to NRT and OAK must be too with DY to ARN and OSL
SJC/CLD
 
ASAFA
Posts: 152
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 12:08 pm

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sat Jan 10, 2015 6:23 pm

Quoting LAXdude1023 (Thread starter):
Alaska - SEA

Alaska is no longer mainline to SEA. The two daily flights are both operated by Skywest CR7s.
 
KC135Hydraulics
Posts: 443
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2012 2:05 am

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sat Jan 10, 2015 6:28 pm

I just flew into Ontario two nights ago and the place was deserted. It's getting harder and harder for me to find good travel fares out of Ontario these days. I live in Menifee, which is about 40 minutes away from Ontario, and sadly I am starting to have to look at San Diego or LAX which are much farther away for competitive travel deals now. I am sad, Ontario has been my "home" airport for many years but it's clear to see it's dying every time I go there. So many deserted gates.
MSgt, USAF
KC-135R / C-17A Pneudraulic Systems Mechanic Supervisor
 
User avatar
ramprat74
Posts: 1353
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2003 6:01 pm

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sat Jan 10, 2015 6:40 pm

They need to move all the airlines into Terminal 4. It's really sad what ONT has become. I think LAWA makes more money filming commercials at ONT then what the airlines bring in.
 
N1120A
Posts: 26488
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 5:40 pm

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sat Jan 10, 2015 6:46 pm

Quoting alasizon (Reply 7):
Its pricey for passenger airlines due to the terminals that are far overbuilt.


Those terminals were a very good idea in 1998. The airport was growing, the economy was great and the nature of airline service was quite different. The old terminals, which I grew up with and miss very much, were just too small to handle the necessary traffic.

Quoting DC10LOVER (Reply 10):
Since i didn't know much about Ontario International Airport i went searching. Looks like there is a law suit over control of the airport. Then we have a so called "Judge" saying the law suit is "‘long, complicated’. It is not complicated. Give the airport back to the City of Ontario. Seems like people have a stake in LAX and would love to shut down Ontario Airport. (Force everyone to use LAX)


Do you have any idea about the history? At all? The City of Ontario sold to the City of Los Angeles more than 50 years ago. Of course it is a long and complicated lawsuit.

As for LAWA wanting to shut down ONT, why on earth would they have spent MILLIONS to build new terminals, with space for more? Why would they have costs lower than LAX? Why would they have pushed ONT for YEARS, before it became obvious that it would always be what it is?

Quoting DC10LOVER (Reply 10):
It will be interesting to find out about this so called "Judge's" ruling. (Just like Politicians - "Judges" are corrupt as well)


Good to see you have so much respect for the law.
Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
 
bpat777
Posts: 654
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 1999 8:21 am

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sat Jan 10, 2015 6:56 pm

Quoting LAXdude1023 (Reply 12):
AA doesnt fly any RJs to Southern California from Texas. Not a single one.

...I think AA flies CR9s between IAH and LAX 3x daily.
 
N1120A
Posts: 26488
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 5:40 pm

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sat Jan 10, 2015 6:59 pm

Quoting bpat777 (Reply 32):
Quoting LAXdude1023 (Reply 12):
AA doesnt fly any RJs to Southern California from Texas. Not a single one.

...I think AA flies CR9s between IAH and LAX 3x daily.

2x today. Mesa CR9s.

BTW - AA employees absolutely HATE Mesa.
Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
 
sunnyflyer
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 7:04 pm

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sat Jan 10, 2015 9:45 pm

Only 1 person mentioned the cargo operations at ONT,I recommend listening to the ATC traffic,the heavies are coming & going all night long until dawn,that has to account highly for it's importance to the IE, also no curfew.
 
DeltaXNA
Posts: 458
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 8:52 am

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sat Jan 10, 2015 10:04 pm

This is northern california, however starting this spring, I forget the exact date DFW-SJC will have one CR9 frequency along with 4 daily 738's.
 
User avatar
thekorean
Posts: 1751
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2011 9:05 pm

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sat Jan 10, 2015 10:18 pm

Surprised more LCC are not serving LA area via here, I assume fees would be much lower than LAX.

The cost savings they can pass down to consumers might tempt passengers.
 
mikesairways
Posts: 664
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2003 1:47 am

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sat Jan 10, 2015 10:22 pm

Quoting DeltaXNA (Reply 35):
This is northern california, however starting this spring, I forget the exact date DFW-SJC will have one CR9 frequency along with 4 daily 738's.


I think it's right around March 1. There will be occasional 319's in the mix as well from what I've heard.
The red zone is for the immediate loading and unloading of passengers only, there is no stopping in the white zone...(Ai
 
User avatar
LOWS
Posts: 1335
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2011 5:37 am

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sat Jan 10, 2015 10:26 pm

Quoting N1120A (Reply 33):
BTW - SA)">AA employees absolutely HATE Mesa.

I have yet to meet anyone who likes MESA.
 
User avatar
OzarkD9S
Posts: 5348
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2001 2:31 am

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sat Jan 10, 2015 11:09 pm

Quoting LOWS (Reply 38):


I have yet to meet anyone who likes MESA.

Mesa the company or the employees? I've flown Mesa 2-3 times against my better judgement, but the flights were on time and the flight crews were top notch.
Finally headed to DORKFEST! Sept 7, STL-LAX-PHX-STL. :cloudnine:
 
tommy767
Posts: 4658
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2003 12:18 pm

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sat Jan 10, 2015 11:14 pm

Quoting commavia (Reply 3):

UA secretly pulled mainline to ONT after the merger. DEN & IAH had 320 and 757 service just a few years ago. This is what happens when you run short on mainline planes.
"KEEP CLIMBING" -- DELTA
 
commavia
Posts: 11489
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 2:30 am

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sat Jan 10, 2015 11:30 pm

Quoting tommy767 (Reply 40):
UA secretly pulled mainline

"Secretly?" Hmmm.

Quoting tommy767 (Reply 40):
DEN & IAH had 320 and 757 service just a few years ago. This is what happens when you run short on mainline planes.

As has been discussed, though, it's about more than just "run[ning] short on mainline planes" - the market is down pretty much across the board. As recently as 2004 Delta was flying multiple daily mainline jets to SLC and ATL (including a 767 to ATL), JetBlue had nonstops to JFK and Hawaiian flew a 767 to HNL.

The biggest issue is the market itself - for all the reasons already discussed, ranging from a poor macroeconomic environment in the region to the concentration of air service at LAX in search of higher yields.
 
User avatar
LOWS
Posts: 1335
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2011 5:37 am

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sun Jan 11, 2015 12:10 am

Quoting OzarkD9S (Reply 39):
Mesa the company or the employees? I've flown Mesa 2-3 times against my better judgement, but the flights were on time and the flight crews were top notch.

The company.
 
N1120A
Posts: 26488
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 5:40 pm

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sun Jan 11, 2015 12:21 am

Quoting sunnyflyer (Reply 34):
also no curfew.

LAX doesn't have a curfew either.

Quoting thekorean (Reply 36):
Surprised more LCC are not serving LA area via here, I assume fees would be much lower than LAX.

Think again. Both are low.

Quoting thekorean (Reply 36):
The cost savings they can pass down to consumers might tempt passengers.

The cost savings aren't enough. In fact, they could get even cheaper costs at BUR, while getting much higher yield traffic and more cachement.

Quoting OzarkD9S (Reply 39):
Mesa the company or the employees? I've flown Mesa 2-3 times against my better judgement, but the flights were on time and the flight crews were top notch.

The Mesa flight I flew yesterday was delayed thanks to Mesa pulling the plane from AA at PHX at the last minute and not sending a replacement, and not communicating what had happened to the AA staff. They were LIVID.

Quoting tommy767 (Reply 40):
UA secretly pulled mainline to ONT after the merger. DEN & IAH had 320 and 757 service just a few years ago. This is what happens when you run short on mainline planes.

IAH didn't have A320s or 757s. Indeed, I think IAH had the last of CO's MD80s and also received 737s.
Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
 
barney captain
Posts: 2167
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2001 5:47 pm

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sun Jan 11, 2015 7:27 am

ONT has the worst concessions of any airport we serve - by far. IF they are open, they are ridiculously expensive. The Schlotzsky's, Round Table Pizza and the Mexican place will routinely be closed in the middle of the day for no apparent reason. The good news is, when Round Table IS open, they will sell you a single slice of pizza and a soda for $13.95. Exorbitant - even by airport standards.
Southeast Of Disorder
 
tommy767
Posts: 4658
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2003 12:18 pm

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:34 am

Quoting N1120A (Reply 43):

sUA flew 757 on ONT-IAH in 2012. Look it up.
"KEEP CLIMBING" -- DELTA
 
slcdeltarumd11
Posts: 4349
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 7:30 am

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:46 am

Havn't fees at ONT gone up alot? I think that explains it, they ran service away by raising fees too much

When the economy really picks up and recovers out there, I bet we see some service come back.

I remember flying ont-CVG n/s an unthinkable link nowdays!
 
asteriskceo
Posts: 486
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 12:42 pm

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sun Jan 11, 2015 10:11 am

What's to be said about the LAWA "stranglehold?"
 
User avatar
LAXintl
Posts: 23549
Joined: Wed May 24, 2000 12:12 pm

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sun Jan 11, 2015 5:09 pm

Quoting slcdeltarumd11 (Reply 46):
Havn't fees at ONT gone up alot? I think that explains it, they ran service away by raising fees too much

For last 2-years running, the cost at ONT have declined, and ONT enjoys lower operating fee structure than LAX.

Yes after 2007 with the economic spiral, cost per enplaned passenger rose (as it did across many of the nations airports with reduced enplanements), bringing ONT in the upper range of 'small/medium sized' facilities per FAA definition.
By 2011 cost plateaud putting ONT on par with places like LAS, PDX, SJC, MHT, SYR, etc but much lower than airport such as SMF, PIT, CLE, STL which are in the same FAA category.
From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
 
asteriskceo
Posts: 486
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 12:42 pm

RE: The Decline In Service At ONT

Sun Jan 11, 2015 7:33 pm

Funny coincidence—today, my local paper ran a pretty indepth 3 page story about the not-so-friendly relationship between LAWA and ONT. Wish they had posted the entire article online, but I did snap a shot of the frontpage:


http://imgur.com/cAvIItP

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos