Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Quoting Aesma (Reply 2): Finished aircraft were painted a dark blue, almost black, to increase the emission of internal heat and to act as camouflage against the night sky. |
Quoting nomadd22 (Reply 3): It might have very well have run cooler if it was black, since black would have radiated friction based heat better. |
Quoting nomadd22 (Reply 3): The white paint on the Concorde didn't really have much to do with temperature. |
Quoting BMI727 (Reply 5): The blue Concorde sponsored by Pepsi was limited in speed and time because it lacked the white paint of regular versions. |
Quoting WingedMigrator (Reply 4): Nope. White radiates just fine. In fact it is the color used for spacecraft thermal radiators. |
Quoting TristarSteve (Reply 6): The Pepsi Concorde was only shown on the ground so didn't need to go supersonic so was painted with standard paint. |
Quoting WingedMigrator (Reply 9): The infrared emissivity of black is no higher than that of white, and therefore it does not radiate heat more efficiently. That is indeed not cutting edge science. |
Quoting nomadd22 (Reply 11): Black coatings make for more efficient radiators for the same reason you don't want them on objects subject to heating from sunlight. They absorb both visible and infrared better than white. |
Quoting Aesma (Reply 2): From wikipedia about the SR-71 : Finished aircraft were painted a dark blue, almost black, to increase the emission of internal heat and to act as camouflage against the night sky. The dark color led to the aircraft's call sign "Blackbird". Concorde being a passenger airplane didn't have that much "internal heat" to dissipate so the main problem was friction with the air. And it flew during the day so black would have been bad. |
Quoting WingedMigrator (Reply 13): Quoting nomadd22 (Reply 11): Black coatings make for more efficient radiators for the same reason you don't want them on objects subject to heating from sunlight. They absorb both visible and infrared better than white. That is only partially correct. In colloquial usage, absorptivity means absorptivity in the visible spectrum and emissivity means emissivity in the infrared spectrum. Black and white (and just about any other color, for that matter) have similar emissivity and are about equally effective at radiating in the infrared, which is what you care about for rejecting heat as long as your temperature isn't so high that things start to glow. You can convince yourself of this by looking at some datasheets for some typical space-grade paints. Aeroglaze Z306 (flat black) and Aeroglaze A276 (gloss white) both have the same infrared emissivity of 0.9 Black paint does indeed absorb more in the visible spectrum, which is why coatings that are primarily designed to reject heat are white and not black. The SR-71 was the color it was for other reasons mentioned up-thread. |
Quoting keta (Reply 15): In the end, the XB-70 was painted white and also flew at Mach 3, and the U-2 is usually black, and I wouldn't say it's because of speed... |